Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
English (A26)
1 c4 e5 2 Nc3 Nc6 3 g3 g6 4 Bg2 Bg7 5 d3 d6

Number of games in database: 1120
Years covered: 1925 to 2023
Overall record:
   White wins 31.2%
   Black wins 29.6%
   Draws 39.2%

Popularity graph, by decade

Explore this opening  |  Search for sacrifices in this opening.
With the White Pieces With the Black Pieces
Normunds Miezis  17 games
Tomasz Markowski  13 games
Jan Smejkal  10 games
Artur Yusupov  9 games
Joseph G Gallagher  9 games
Igor-Alexandre Nataf  8 games
NOTABLE GAMES [what is this?]
White Wins Black Wins
Kasparov vs Short, 1990
Andersson vs Gulko, 1976
Ivanchuk vs Nunn, 1994
Larsen vs Spassky, 1981
J Xu vs Korchnoi, 1993
Ehlvest vs Karpov, 1991
<< previous chapter next chapter >>

 page 1 of 45; games 1-25 of 1,120  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. C Carls vs Tartakower ½-½501925Baden-BadenA26 English
2. O Antze vs A Speijer  1-0321926VAS-Bremer SchachgesellschaftA26 English
3. Flohr vs L Steiner  ½-½551933Folkestone OlympiadA26 English
4. Flohr vs E Mulder 1-0241933ScheveningenA26 English
5. Capablanca vs Bogoljubov ½-½461936NottinghamA26 English
6. H Bruckhaus vs G Kieninger  0-1281938KrefeldA26 English
7. Petrosian vs Krogius 1-0361946URS-ch U18A26 English
8. E Lundin vs O Barda  0-1701947Nordic ZonalA26 English
9. Golombek vs R Broadbent  1-0381947British Championship PlayoffA26 English
10. P Kondratiev vs D Grechkin  0-1281951URS-ch sf SverdlovskA26 English
11. Aronin vs E Terpugov  ½-½361951USSR ChampionshipA26 English
12. Smyslov vs Averbakh ½-½391953Training TournamentA26 English
13. E Hearst vs E Zemgalis  ½-½28195354th US OpenA26 English
14. Petrosian vs Boleslavsky ½-½211953Zuerich CandidatesA26 English
15. C Carls vs Heinicke  1-0371954Bremen - HamburgA26 English
16. T Gniot vs S Witkowski  1-0201955Polish ChampionshipA26 English
17. S Gawlikowski vs S Witkowski  1-0391955Polish ChampionshipA26 English
18. S Gawlikowski vs S Kwapisz  1-0451955Polish ChampionshipA26 English
19. Petrosian vs Simagin 1-0441956Moscow Championship playoffA26 English
20. Petrosian vs Spassky ½-½711956Amsterdam CandidatesA26 English
21. S Loverdos vs B Soos  0-1641956Moscow Olympiad qual-4A26 English
22. D Horseman vs J Penrose 1-0571956Hastings 1956/57A26 English
23. O'Kelly vs C H Alexander  1-0411957Hastings 1956/57A26 English
24. E Stoliar vs A Khasin  1-0321957USSR ChampionshipA26 English
25. E Stoliar vs A Bannik  ½-½411957USSR ChampionshipA26 English
 page 1 of 45; games 1-25 of 1,120  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-02-04  Giancarlo: Many chess books I've seen have descirbed the King-side Finachetto as a target for your opponet. The key being to swap off the Bishop and make the squares h3 and f3/h6 and f6 more vulnerable to an attack. I'm not one who practises the Finachetto regularly, <except playing Dutch as Black, trying to get B7 achieved with the queen side bishop> but I was hoping I could hear from people in this topic. Thank you.
Nov-20-04  Dudley: The fianchetto formation is vulnerable to an attack that has been called the "h pawn hack" where you swap off the bishop with bishop h6 or h3, castle Q side and advance the h and usually g pawns to pry open the h file. White usually has a pawn on f3 to support his e4 pawn. The Yugoslav attack against the Sicilian Dragon or the Sameisch attack vs. the King's Indian are the two most common examples, although it also comes up vs. the Pirc, etc. However, this type of attack really shouldn't work when white does the K side fianchetto as you see here in the English (reversed Dragon) because White's extra tempo gives him options not usually available to Black,such as a d4 break, countering the flank attack in the center. That won't stop the rabid attacking players from trying it, but it won't work if White knows what he is doing. It seems to be the only way of playing against a fianchetto most people know, but is not appropriate in many cases.
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: When White delays Nf3, as here, he gains two options which simultaneously develop the King side and help slow down the Black attack.

1. He plays e2-e3, Nge2 and an eventual f2-f4 after Black's ...f5. 2. He plays e2-e4, Nge2 (the Botvinnik formation). When Black plays ...f5, White plays e4xf5 followed by f2-f4.

Both have the same disadvantage; without Nf3, d4 won't put as much pressure on the Black center, even when it is the best move. Also, White attacks the Queen side while Black attacks the White King. White always gets the first blow, but sometimes Black gets the last.

The timing in any variation of this line (White also has 5.a3, 5.b3, and 5.d3) is delicate and difficult for either player to handle. When I played this line from either side against Master-level competition, it was not unusual for each player to have only 5 minutes to make the last 20 moves. Play ranges from extremely subtle postional manouvering to simultaneous sacrificial attacks. One of my best games featured a central formation where by move 25, I had pawns on d5 and f5 versus pawns on d6, e5 and f6--oh, and my King was on e4!

I can't honestly tell you that I mastered the line--and it was one of my staple openings.

Nov-20-04  Dudley: <An Englishman> Your comments were more relevant to the actual position-I was answering the question in a general sense. Anyway, do you still like the Botvinnik system? I have a book that has a good explantion of it and Jeremy Silman seems to like it, but he has a special affection for closed systems. I think it's time I started playing like a grownup and this system seems to have some real depth to it.
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: Dudley, your response was good and valid--a lot of inexperienced Black players conduct the game as you suggest and can't understand why their attacks don't crash through. I do still like the Botvinnik, but I haven't played tournament chess in almost 15 years. It's a good, versatile response to most of Black's replies to 1.c4 (and it works as a defense to 1.c4, too!), but when the Botvinnik crashes and burns, the results are not pretty. In fact, one of the best games versus the Botvinnik is this one: Benko vs Botvinnik, 1968. Yes, it's Botvinnik pummelling the Botvinnik. Try and find where Benko went wrong. It isn't easy.
Jan-30-06  SniperOnG7: <Dudley> LOL i know the time between my post and your post is a tad long, but may you tell me the name (and author) of the book which examines the Botvinnik?
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: <SniperOnG7>, John Watson published a four-volume set of books on the English circa 1980 that I used as a foundation for my knowledge of the English. Of course, specific theory for most lines has changed, but three of the four mentioned the multitudinous permutations of the Botvinnik for both White and Black.

Opening books can be odd things: sometimes the old ones are still worth reading although the theory of specific variations has become obsolete.

Jan-30-06  SniperOnG7: SniperOnG7: <An Englishman> Iv been dithering back and forth for a long time on whether to buy Watson's series but thanks to you iv now got a solid reason for buying them (makes me feel less guilty about spending the money) :)
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Opening of the Day

1.c4 e5 2.♘c3 ♘c6 3.g3 g6 4.♗g2 ♗g7 5.d3 d6

click for larger view

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific opening only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC