Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack (B63)
1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 d6 3 d4 cxd4 4 Nxd4 Nf6 5 Nc3 Nc6 6 Bg5 e6
7 Qd2

Number of games in database: 1178
Years covered: 1935 to 2019
Overall record:
   White wins 39.1%
   Black wins 27.9%
   Draws 32.9%

Popularity graph, by decade

Explore this opening  |  Search for sacrifices in this opening.
With the White Pieces With the Black Pieces
John van der Wiel  16 games
Vlastimil Jansa  14 games
Nigel Short  13 games
Dimitri Gurevich  21 games
Vasilios Kotronias  17 games
Gennady Sosonko  15 games
NOTABLE GAMES [what is this?]
White Wins Black Wins
Tal vs Koblents, 1957
Tal vs E Nievergelt, 1959
Tal vs Larsen, 1979
Bronstein vs Botvinnik, 1951
Ivanchuk vs Anand, 1998
Suetin vs Botvinnik, 1952
<< previous chapter next chapter >>

 page 1 of 48; games 1-25 of 1,178  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Goglidze vs Pirc 1-0371935MoscowB63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack
2. V A Vasiliev vs Ragozin  0-1401936Leningrad-chB63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack
3. Panov vs O Rubtsova 1-0311936Trade UnionsB63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack
4. Tartakower vs Rossolimo 1-0271936ParisB63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack
5. R Charlier vs A Schwartzman  0-1651936Mar del Plata it-03B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack
6. Keres vs H Heinicke ½-½421936Bad NauheimB63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack
7. K Richter vs Pelikan  0-1781936PodebradyB63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack
8. L Roedl vs J L Ormond  1-0281936Munich OlympiadB63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack
9. R Arlauskas vs S Gudmundsson  0-1331936Munich OlympiadB63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack
10. V Gergenreder vs Moskaliev 0-1281937correspondenceB63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack
11. G Hodakowsky vs A Liepnieks  0-1221937ARSB tournamentB63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack
12. P Trifunovic vs O Kavlie-Jorgensen  1-02019377th olm finalB63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack
13. Vladimir Petrov vs J Kolski  ½-½391938LodzB63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack
14. K Richter vs Szily  1-0351939StuttgartB63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack
15. H van Steenis vs C de Ronde  1-0451939NED-chB63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack
16. P Michel vs L Engels  ½-½301939GER-ch 6thB63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack
17. H W Felderhof vs A D de Groot  0-1221940Amsterdam VVGAB63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack
18. A Simonson vs Denker  ½-½361940USA-chB63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack
19. C J Corte vs J Canepa  1-0451942Mar del PlataB63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack
20. Chekhover vs Boleslavsky  0-1611945USSR ChampionshipB63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack
21. W Elm vs C Toerber 1-0191946Bad Harzburg GERB63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack
22. Prins vs P Devos  0-1431946Hastings 1945/46B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack
23. Averbakh vs Kotov ½-½691946Moscow ChampionshipB63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack
24. C J Corte vs J Traian Iliesco  1-0401946Mar del PlataB63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack
25. Unzicker vs L Fleischmann  1-0391946Klaus Junge MemorialB63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack
 page 1 of 48; games 1-25 of 1,178  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-28-05  vampiero: Ok, so white has an astounding winning percentage in this opening, and we can see that this defense's popularity has gone way down in the past decade. but what is it due to, late catsling for black and no castling at all lead to kingside weakness, maybe because it takes to long for the b5 and a6 pawns to move while all of whites pieces are already developed? but why dont you guys look into the 1e4 c5 2Nf3 d6 3d4 cxd4 4Nxd4 Nf6 5Nc3 Nc6 6Bg5 e6 7Qd2 Be7 80-0-0 0-0 lines becuase black is much more safe than in the d7 lines.

opinions? how can black get counterplay?

Mar-30-08  hamworld: " 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. Bg5 e6 7. Qd2 Be7 8. O-O-O 0-0" will probably just end up with a bunch of exchanges leading to a drawish endgame. Its popularity might've gone down due to drawish lines. That, or maybe players prefer other sicilian openings. The late castling isn't horrible. I think I castled in the 37-39th move and won anyway.

Not an expert or anything, I just want to comment.

Mar-30-08  hrvyklly: <hamworld: " 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. Bg5 e6 7. Qd2 Be7 8. O-O-O 0-0"> I've always thought that this is totally sound for Black (unlike other lines of the Rauzer I could mention) and I have no idea why its popularity has waned. Kramnik stopped playing (for the most part) 1...c5 and switched to 1...e5 - I remember both Kramnik and Anand playing it in the 90s - which may account for it going out of fashion . Or p'haps as it is not as sharp as the Najdorf or Sveshnikov? Any stronger players want to chip in and explain what's wrong/dubious/uncomfortable playing this as Black?
Jun-27-12  fisayo123: It seems slightly inferior to the other Sicilian variations. The bishop pair isn't necessarily worth the hassle with your king stranded at the center regardless of how solid blacks pawn structure seems.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific opening and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC