Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
French Defense (C00)
1 e4 e6

Number of games in database: 7515
Years covered: 1827 to 2023
Overall record:
   White wins 40.2%
   Black wins 34.0%
   Draws 25.8%

Popularity graph, by decade

Explore this opening  |  Search for sacrifices in this opening.
With the White Pieces With the Black Pieces
Mikhail Chigorin  43 games
Lawrence Day  33 games
Vadim Zvjaginsev  27 games
Ivan Farago  48 games
Evgeny Gleizerov  30 games
Alfredo Giaccio  23 games
NOTABLE GAMES [what is this?]
White Wins Black Wins
Nimzowitsch vs Systemsson, 1927
Keres vs Verbac, 1933
Morphy vs Anderssen, 1858
M Ortueta Esteban vs J Sanz Aguado, 1933
Nimzowitsch vs Capablanca, 1911
Larsen vs Petrosian, 1966
<< previous chapter next chapter >>

 page 1 of 301; games 1-25 of 7,515 
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. C Vezin vs The Turk ½-½571827friendlyC00 French Defense
2. Mrs. Fisher vs The Turk 1-0411827ExhibitionC00 French Defense
3. McDonnell vs W Fraser 1-0371831MatchC00 French Defense
4. McDonnell vs W Fraser ½-½741831MatchC00 French Defense
5. McDonnell vs La Bourdonnais 0-1501834La Bourdonnais - McDonnell 1st Casual MatchC00 French Defense
6. La Bourdonnais vs L S Lecrivain 1-0281836Blindfold simul, 2bC00 French Defense
7. G Walker vs Saint-Amant 0-1441836Casual gameC00 French Defense
8. La Bourdonnais vs D Wilson 1-0441837Blindfold simulC00 French Defense
9. Staunton vs W M Popert 0-1271840MatchC00 French Defense
10. Kieseritzky vs Saint-Amant 0-1391840ParisC00 French Defense
11. Cochrane vs Staunton 1-0231842Casual gameC00 French Defense
12. Cochrane vs Staunton 0-1241842Casual gameC00 French Defense
13. Cochrane vs Staunton 0-1381842Casual gameC00 French Defense
14. Cochrane vs Staunton 0-1381842Casual gameC00 French Defense
15. M Wyvill vs H Buckle  1-0301843Casual gameC00 French Defense
16. Staunton vs Cochrane  1-0321843Casual gameC00 French Defense
17. Taverner vs Saint-Amant 0-1421843Great BritainC00 French Defense
18. A Shishmanovich vs Zytogorski 1-0201844RousseC00 French Defense
19. C Stanley vs E Rousseau  0-1281845Rousseau - StanleyC00 French Defense
20. von der Lasa vs Loewenthal  ½-½321846ViennaC00 French Defense
21. F J Devinck vs Saint-Amant  1-0391846La RegenceC00 French Defense
22. B Horwitz / G Medley vs D Harrwitz / Von Carnap  ½-½421847Consultation gameC00 French Defense
23. Utrecht vs Wijk bij Duurstede 0-1291848City MatchC00 French Defense
24. E Lowe vs H Kennedy 0-1421848Kennedy - Lowe mC00 French Defense
25. Bird vs G W Medley 1-0211849LondonC00 French Defense
 page 1 of 301; games 1-25 of 7,515 
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 15 OF 15 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-24-12  kitbitzer31: Thanks to both <haydn20> and <thomastonk> in answering my numerous questions. Thanks or being so patient and kind to an amateur.
Sep-24-12  kitbitzer31: But what if 9...Ne7 instead? Then after 10.Qg4 0-0....
Sep-24-12  kitbitzer31: It appears to me that there is no direct refutation in the 6...cxb4 line. Most likely the line has just gone out of fashion...
Sep-24-12  kitbitzer31: Can I play with Black against one of you with the 6...cxb4 line? Thanks.
Sep-24-12  thomastonk: <kitbitzer31: there is no direct refutation in the 6...cxb4 line.> Well, White cannot announce a mate or does not win a piece by force, but I think that Black is clearly worse, and hence it "gone out of fashion".

<Kitbitzer31: Can I play with Black against one of you with the 6...cxb4 line?> Where are you going to play?

Sep-24-12  whiteshark: <kibitzer31>

<1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Ba5 6.b4 cxb4 7.Nb5 Nc6 8.axb4 Bxb4+ 9.c3 Be7 10.Ba3 Nh6 11.Bxe7 Qxe7 12.Nd6+ Kf8 13.Bb5 f6> is the mainline according to Fritz 11 opening book. However <13... Nf5> is the move Fritz suggested on infinitive search with <14.Nxf5 exf5>

click for larger view

and now either 15.Ne2 or 15.Qb3 with only +0.2 pawns advantage.

Sep-24-12  whiteshark: And for the sake of classification, the a.m. line belongs properly spea♔ more to French, Winawer, Advance (C17) or possibly even to C18
Sep-24-12  kitbitzer31: To <thomastonk>, In chesscube?
Sep-24-12  kitbitzer31: Thanks for the help guys... I've gotten a better idea on how to play the opening thanks to you guys..
Sep-24-12  kitbitzer31: <Whiteshark>, why 7...Nc6 and not 7...bxa3+?
Sep-26-12  kitbitzer31: Whiteshark, any help would greatly be appreciated. Thanks.
Sep-26-12  thomastonk: <kitbitzer31: why 7...Nc6 and not 7...bxa3+?> Well, 7.. bxa3 opens the diagonal a3-f8 for the Bc1, whereas 7.. Nc6 and another book line, 7.. b3, don't.

BTW, I don't like White's play in Fritz 11 opening book given above.

Sep-27-12  kitbitzer31: Ah. Thanks <thomastonk>..
Feb-18-13  Tigranny: I love the French.
Feb-18-13  parisattack: <Tigranny: I love the French.>

I am learning to. I want to be a breed apart, also. :) List of books on the French on my forum.

Feb-24-13  2blackrooks: Hi all
I've been playing the odd rubinstein French Roll Eyes. It doesn't seem to get a good press and a lot of players think its boring. Is it possible to sex it up a bit and make it more aggressive?? I play it because it cuts down on the theory as I'm learning the game.

How does the Frere (Becker) variation hold up? 1,e4 e6. 2. d4 d5 3.Nc3/Nd2 dxe4 4. Nxe4 Qd5 Or the Ellis Gambit: 1,e4 e6. 2. d4 d5 3.Nc3/Nd2 dxe4 4. Nxe4 e5 Ellis Gambit Delayed: 1,e4 e6. 2. d4 d5 3.Nc3/Nd2 dxe4 4. Nxe4 Nc6 5.Nf3 e5.

Mar-05-13  parisattack: <2blackrooks: Hi all
I've been playing the odd rubinstein French Roll Eyes. It doesn't seem to get a good press and a lot of players think its boring. Is it possible to sex it up a bit and make it more aggressive?? I play it because it cuts down on the theory as I'm learning the game.>

The Rub actually seems to be more popular than ever (relatively speaking). I've seen several articles on the so-called Fort Knox setup within the Rub.

Becker seems to be OK tho to me it looks as if black is just playing a somewhat limited Center Counter. The Ellis, on the other hand, I think you're sort of just asking for it...

Dec-24-13  zipperbear: French Defense is not a good option, much stronger is Russian Game, Stalin Defense! Just for fun.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: John Cochrane page 261 from his 'A Treatise on the Game of Chess' printed in 1822.

Inside cover in two pics.

When analysing The French (which he calls: 'The King's Pawn One Game', the opening - it did not get named the French Defence till after the London - Paris correspondence match (1834–1836.)

John Cochrane was not too fond of Captain Joseph Bertin's (1690s – 1736) suggestion of 3.e5. Though Cochrane did himself play it in later years.

He gives in this section of the book general advice that grabbing the centre with pawns, d4,e4 and f4 may not always be a good thing and the White centre can be 'extremely feeble'.

Published in 1822 just about 100 years before 'hyper-modern' chess was making it's mark.


Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: The variation 1. e4 e6 2. Bb2 is known as the Papa-Ticulat Gambit - does anyone know how it received this name?
Sep-08-20  wkrol: New gambit in French Defense (C00) after 2. f4 d5 3. Nf3 pleace look on my blog: Greeting from Poland !
Mar-25-21  Poisonpawns: Also known as "King Pawn sneak one" opening.Hey anyone know of modern GM`s today who have a stellar record with the white pieces against the French, so that I can steal their repertoire?
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <Poisonpawns>
How about Anand?
Mar-25-21  paavoh: Karpov is not a "GM of today", but you can learn a lot from his approach to the French Defense.
Mar-25-21  paavoh: <The variation 1. e4 e6 2. Bb2 <<you meant 2.b3>> is known as the Papa-Ticulat Gambit - does anyone know how it received this name?> I guess Mike Papa has something to do with it: Game Collection: Mike Papa demonstrates the Papa Gambit
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 15)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 15 OF 15 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific opening only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC