Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

page 1 of 21; games 1-25 of 514  Game   Result Moves Year Event/Locale Opening 1. Philidor vs NN 1-0 23 1790 Unknown C32 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit 2. J B vs C Craig 0-1 17 1857 USA C32 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit 3. B Raphael vs Paulsen 0-1 53 1857 1st American Chess Congress C32 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit 4. de Riviere vs P Journoud 0-1 39 1859 Paris m/1 C32 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit 5. E Pindar vs Kipping   1-0 29 1861 Manchester C32 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit 6. Blackburne vs Lewis 1-0 25 1862 Blindfold simul, 10b C32 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit 7. Paulsen vs R Lichtenscheidt ½-½ 30 1863 Blindfold simul, 10b C32 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit 8. Staunton vs E Cordner 1-0 21 1865 Dublin C32 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit 9. H Hosmer vs J A Congdon   1-0 23 1874 3rd American Chess Congress C32 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit 10. J A Congdon vs A Cohnfeld   0-1 24 1880 5th American Chess Congress C32 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit 11. E Schallopp vs Max Weiss   0-1 34 1885 Hamburg C32 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit 12. C Brocklebank vs J Higgs 1-0 35 1888 Australian Championship C32 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit 13. L Van Vliet vs J Mason   1-0 33 1891 London C32 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit 14. Charousek vs Pillsbury ½-½ 50 1896 Nuremberg C32 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit 15. E Schallopp vs Blackburne 0-1 20 1896 Nuremberg C32 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit 16. Winawer vs E Schallopp   1-0 52 1896 Nuremberg C32 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit 17. Charousek vs W Cohn 1-0 29 1897 Berlin C32 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit 18. K A Walbrodt vs H W Trenchard   1-0 62 1898 Vienna C32 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit 19. Janowski vs Pillsbury 1-0 50 1898 Vienna C32 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit 20. Charousek vs J N Berger 0-1 32 1898 11th DSB Kongress, Cologne C32 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit 21. D Bleijkmans vs W Schwan   1-0 42 1899 DCA Congress 27th C32 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit 22. Pillsbury vs W E Hardy   ½-½ 35 1900 Blindfold simul, 12b C32 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit 23. E Delmar vs W Napier 1-0 21 1901 Buffalo C32 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit 24. Loman vs C H Sherrard   1-0 29 1902 Match C32 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit 25. Bardeleben / Allies vs Pillsbury / Allies 0-1 45 1902 Consultation game C32 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit  page 1 of 21; games 1-25 of 514

REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)

Jan-11-06    KingG: The moves don't correspond to the position on the board. Jan-12-06    An Englishman: Good Evening: Yes, and where is Schulten-Morphy? Jan-24-06    Fischer of Men: I just added it. Feb-12-06    Fischer of Men: Apparently that game is ECO C31 so it was already in the database. Jul-07-06    Wassily: 8. ... Bf2+ Jul-07-06    KingG: <8. ... Bf2+> What about it? Jan-08-08    crwynn: It's not good ;) Feb-13-08    ganstaman: I used to be scared of the Falkbeer, but now I realize that it gives white similar developmental advantage and central control as the KGA without the investment of a pawn. I'm certainly not scared anymore. Nov-28-10    rapidcitychess: A quick check with my shiny new MCO-15 reveals this gambit is pretty alright. Lots of and and and = floating around. My gut says this must be pretty bad. You don't have the infamous ...Bb4+ of the Albin, so where's the good stuff? The central wedge seems short lived, and the pawn minus will take its toll. Or maybe not. Any resident experts on the Falkbeer?? Oct-01-11    DeReFormation: Are there any games of the Alapin V.(C32) Oct-01-11    Shams: <DeReFormation> Can you give the moves, please? Oct-01-11    MaxxLange: Sadly, White can just get a better ending, if they know their stuff, against a lot of the fun lines for Black Oct-02-11    HSOL: Shams: Alapin variation: 1.e4 e5 2.f4 d5 3.exd5 e4 4.d3 Nf6 5.dxe4 Nxe4 6.Nf3 Bc5 7.Qe2 Bf2+ 8.Kd1 Qxd5+ 9.Nfd2 Oct-02-11    Shams: <HSOL> Isn't that line just known to be bad for Black? Oct-02-11    Shams: Even though the main lines favor White, I feel like Black can get pretty good play-- at least against me. Lately I've preferred Spassky's idea <1.e4 e5 2.f4 d5 3.exd5 e4 4.d3 Nf6 5.dxe4 Nxe4> as usual and now <6.Be3 Qh4+ 7.g3 Nxg3 8.Nf3 Qe7 9.Nxg3 Qxe3+ 10.Qe2 Qxe2+ 11.Bxe2> with a more comfortable ending. click for larger view

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community! If you already have an account, you should login now.

Please observe our posting guidelines: No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions. Nothing in violation of United States law. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times. See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator. NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific opening and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC