< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Jun-01-04 | | PinkPanther: <OneBadDog>
It's only the "Karpov Gambit" which has "killed" this opening, but the gambit can be avoided by not pushing the pawn and pinning the knight with the bishop instead. Overall, I would say the Open Variation is alive and well. |
|
Jun-01-04 | | OneBadDog: <PinkPanther> I understand what you're saying. However, most of the Bg4 lines lead to a slight but persistant edge for white. |
|
Jun-01-04 | | PinkPanther: <OneBadDog>
Most of the opening lines in all of chess lead to a slight but persistant edge for white. |
|
Jun-01-04 | | OneBadDog: True, but depending on what your sources are, there are some openings that do equalize for Black. Looking at NCO there are a number of lines, especially against 1e4, that equalize. |
|
Jun-01-04 | | PinkPanther: True, but only because of inaccuracies made by white. |
|
Jun-01-04 | | acirce: I usually play 11. Bxe6 instead of the Ng5 "gambit". Quite as good, I think. |
|
Jun-01-04 | | OneBadDog: the Qe2 lines are also intersting. |
|
Aug-16-04 | | tomh72000: Do you mean 9.Qe2, the Howell/Keres attack? It seems to give black equality if he knows the theory. |
|
Jul-28-06 | | Ness: after move 6. d4 why isn't the pawn captured? i must be missing something obvious! HELP PLZ |
|
Jul-28-06 | | micartouse: <Ness>The line is considered dangerous for Black because it leads after a series of sharp forcing moves into a clearly superior endgame for White. An exemplary game is: Capablanca vs Edward Lasker, 1915
Also, White can easily force a draw by repetition if he desires. But every once in a while people do risk 6 ... exd4. |
|
Jul-28-06 | | Ness: Ok Thanks for the help micartouse! |
|
Aug-20-06
 | | WTHarvey: Here are some traps n zaps from C83 minitures: http://www.wtharvey.com/c83.html |
|
Oct-23-06 | | popski: I agree here with <refutor>. Also this opening isn't very confortable to play if you are not Korchnoi. |
|
Apr-11-07 | | soughzin: I think acirce might have the right idea. Ng5 is shocking but I feel pretty prepared for it. One can stand on the shoulders of theory and be ready for a forced draw or win if white slips up. Bxe6 makes me fight For the draw, and a loss if I slip up. Anyone else have an interest in this line? |
|
May-26-07 | | Hesam7: I know that Korchnoi has written the monographs for C80-81, C82 and C83; does anyone know when he wrote these three volumes?? |
|
Apr-10-08 | | Simonkaser: There is a problem in the diagram. There isn't a bishop on e7, only one on e6. |
|
Apr-11-08 | | Simonkaser: Correction : in the line above 9.c3 Be7 isn't marked (Bad English lol) |
|
Jun-28-09 | | blacksburg: so...what's the verdict on this thing? has anything happened theoretically in recent years? i don't remember the last time i saw someone playing it. is black really in big trouble in the 9.Nbd2 lines? |
|
Oct-19-10 | | lefthandsketch: Check out a collection of well written articles on the open ruy as well as a knight sac idea, here http://greenpointchess.org/tag/open... |
|
Feb-27-11
 | | Penguincw: Opening of the Day : <Ruy Lopez, Breslau Variation>
1.e4 e5 2.♘f3 ♘c6 3.♗b5 a6 4.♗a4 ♘f6 5.O-O ♘xe4 6.d4 b5 7.♗b3 d5 8.dxe5 ♗e6 9.c3 ♗e7 10.♖e1 O-O 11. ♘d4 Never heard of this opening before.Looks kind of like a Tarrasch. |
|
Mar-16-12
 | | Penguincw: Opening of the Day
Ruy Lopez, Breslau Variation
1.e4 e5 2.♘f3 ♘c6 3.♗b5 a6 4.♗a4 ♘f6 5. O-O ♘xe4 6.d4 b5 7.♘b3 d5 8.dxe5 ♗e6 9. c3 ♗e7 10.♖e1 O-O 11.♘d4  click for larger view |
|
Nov-30-12 | | freeman8201: Can anyone show a line of the Ng5 version. |
|
Nov-30-12 | | Dr. Siggy: A demonstration of how to play against the Breslau variation of the Ruy Lopez, with a very beautiful finish: NN vs Tarrasch, 1915. |
|
Oct-03-13 | | Kikoman: <Opening of the Day> Ruy Lopez, Breslau Variation
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Nxe4 6. d4 b5 7. Bb3 d5 8. dxe5 Be6 9. c3 Be7 10. Re1 O-O 11. Nd4  click for larger viewOpening Explorer |
|
Oct-23-14
 | | perfidious: Thought this OTD looked familiar. |
|
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing> |