Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3) (E71)
1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 g6 3 Nc3 Bg7 4 e4 d6 5 h3

Number of games in database: 1381
Years covered: 1855 to 2020
Overall record:
   White wins 47.0%
   Black wins 24.4%
   Draws 28.6%

Popularity graph, by decade

Explore this opening  |  Search for sacrifices in this opening.
With the White Pieces With the Black Pieces
Mihai Suba  54 games
Anatoly Karpov  18 games
Alina L'Ami  15 games
Wolfgang Uhlmann  11 games
Gadir Guseinov  9 games
Alexander Grischuk  8 games
NOTABLE GAMES [what is this?]
White Wins Black Wins
Radjabov vs V Milov, 2005
Karpov vs Zsuzsa Polgar, 2004
Aronian vs Radjabov, 2013
O Pavlenko vs Kasparov, 1975
A Chernin vs Judit Polgar, 1990
Ponomariov vs Topalov, 2007
<< previous chapter next chapter >>

 page 1 of 56; games 1-25 of 1,381  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Cochrane vs Mohishunder 1-0461855CalcuttaE71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
2. Cochrane vs Mohishunder  1-0431855CalcuttaE71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
3. Tartakower vs Teichmann ½-½321907Ostend-BE71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
4. Saemisch vs Tartakower ½-½261923CopenhagenE71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
5. D Daniuszewski vs R Rey Ardid  1-0281924Paris Unofficial OlympiadE71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
6. Tarrasch vs M Bluemich 0-1811925BreslauE71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
7. H K Mattison vs Euwe  ½-½621929KarlsbadE71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
8. Chodera vs J Dobias ½-½391930Prague-chE71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
9. I Pleci vs G A Thomas  ½-½401930LiegeE71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
10. B Veinshtein vs Goglidze 0-1651931USSR-sf group2E71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
11. M Feigin vs Vladimir Petrov  1-03419313rd Latvian congress playoffE71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
12. F Gygli vs Flohr  0-1231934ZurichE71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
13. A Olivera vs A Medina Garcia  0-1401948Mar del PlataE71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
14. A Poliak vs Suetin  1-0401950URS-ch sfE71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
15. Bondarevsky vs Suetin  1-0551950USSR ChampionshipE71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
16. Tolush vs V Liublinsky 1-0411950USSR ChampionshipE71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
17. Bondarevsky vs Petrosian 0-1821951USSR ChampionshipE71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
18. O Benkner vs F Olafsson  ½-½801952Helsinki ol (Men) prel-AE71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
19. Sokolsky vs A Prameshuber  ½-½411953AUT-URSE71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
20. Bronstein vs Gligoric 1-0571953Zurich CandidatesE71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
21. Gligoric vs R Toran Albero  ½-½691955Mar del PlataE71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
22. A Rico Gonzalez vs F Ballbe Anglada 1-0291955GijonE71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
23. R Fuchs vs V Ciocaltea  ½-½301956Dresden itE71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
24. Sokolsky vs Suetin  1-0411957Ch URS (1/4 final)E71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
25. G Mititelu vs Lombardy  ½-½251957WchT U26 04thE71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
 page 1 of 56; games 1-25 of 1,381  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-22-03  Alchemist: This variation seems to score well for white but is in my opinion a positionally mediocre idea. White prevents the trade of black's light squared bishop for his king's knight but in the process weakens his kingside and opens up the threat of Bxh3 (thematic KID sac) later in the game.
Nov-22-03  PinkPanther: This is the system I use against the KID. And yes, I've had the bishop sacrifice played against me several times, but usually white has enough defensive resources to hang on and basically refute the sacrifice.
Nov-22-03  technical draw: In the last games in this data base white wins 11-5, so it looks pretty solid and well worth analyzing. However its probably not a popular opening in Latin America since the name sounds like a vulgar word in Spanish.
Nov-22-03  Bears092: Pure coincidence. It's named after Vladimir Makagonov
Nov-22-03  Spitecheck: It's likely technical draw might know this Bears since he's looking for a GM norm :). This variation is not the only one Makagonov is responsible for, he's got his foot in the door elsewhere as well. My opinion of the system is that it can't be bad, g4 is a handy square for more than one black piece, however the move is hardly a square punch to the jaw is it, the whole motif of this system might simply be that Makagonov wanted to put his B on e3 without that annoying Ng4 counter. I guess I should have a look in my book on the King's Indian, it would probably describe this system as fairly innocuous that's there favorite name for a variation by white which shouldn't cause to many problems.


Aug-31-04  Giancarlo: I don't like 5.h3. It seems like a defenite waste of time and totally contradicts Lasker. Hard to think an opening line like this would be played. Why not 5.nf3? or even 5.e3/g5. That's what I think.
Aug-31-04  AgentRgent: <Why not 5.nf3? or even 5.e3/g5>

White wins 47.7%
Black wins 23.6%
Draws 28.7%

does this answer your question?

Aug-31-04  refutor: giancarlo...the ideas in this line are similar to the samisch lines, except he's going to try to play f4 in one move instead of two (at least that's the way i play it)
Aug-31-04  maoam: In his "100 Selected Games" (in the notes to game #80) Botvinnik says that "Makagonov prefers continuations in which book knowledge is of little help and positional sense is everything!"
Aug-31-04  Giancarlo: No one has really still answered my quesiotn of the purpose of h3, ok other then 40% or whatever thats not what I care about. I want to know why h3 is played?
Aug-31-04  refutor: i told you...similar to the samisch except he's going to try to play f4 in one move instead of two.
Aug-31-04  Dick Brain: <Giancarlo>the plan of development might be something like White moves of h3, Nf3, d5 (immediately after e5 - dont let Black swap pawn), Bg5 (or Be3), g4, Qd2, Rg1 with expansion and possible attack on the kingside. There are some Saemish ideas here as <refutor> sez, but I dunno about playing f4 that might give Black counterplay against White's weakened squares and e-pawn.
Aug-31-04  Helloween: <Giancarlo> To answer your question, 5.h3 is played mainly to facilitate the advance ♙g2-g4, after which White has a stronghold on the f5 square, making it difficult for Black to get the typical KID break ♙f7-f5 in. White can then castle Queenside and attack Black aggressively on the Kingside, as in Krasenkow vs Obodchuk, 1993. I hope this is of some help to you.
Sep-01-04  Giancarlo: Ty <Dick Brain> and <Helloween>
Sep-01-04  AgentRgent: <Giancarlo:> I apologize, I didn't completely understand what you were asking. When you posted "Why not 5.nf3?" I thought you were simply suggesting that 5. h3 was bad, not that you wanted an explanation of why 5.h3 is good. Sorry about that, I usually try to be helpful, but I guess I missed an opportunity.
Sep-01-04  Giancarlo: Thats alright <AgentRgent>, you didn't know, but you were trying to be helpful, and I appreiciate that.
Apr-05-05  Dustin J.: I have come to love this opening line for white, I don't play the KID as black. It's strong and can double as the white moves for the modern benoni, though the play is of a different theme and pace. Eventually, I get my 12. a3 break in, and the position is so easy to handle. A decently supported pawn storm on the queenside will collapse black's defenses there; it seems that the queenside win is more straight forward for white and more complicated for black. I'd recommend this line for anyone wanting a simpler King's Indian as white.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Ron: Recently opening of the day. I set up the opening position above and Mephisto playing black (set at one of the lower levels) went: ... c5
d5 0-0
Nf3 Qa5
Bd2 Qb6
b3 a6
Bd3 Nd7
0-0 Qc7
Bg5 b6
Qd2 Bb7
Bh6 Re8
Bxg7 Kxg7
Nh2 e6
f4 exd5
exd5 h6
f5 g5
h4 gxh4
Rf4 Ng8
Rxf4 Qd8
Rh3 Ne5
Bc2 Kf8
Qf4 Rb8
Ne4 f6


click for larger view

Rxh6! Nxh6
Qxh6+ Kf7
Qh7+ Kf8
Bd1 Nf7
Bh5 Bxd5
Nc3 Ng5
Qh6+ Kg8
Bxe8 Qxe8
Ng4 Nh7
Nxd5 ....

Dec-06-07  pawnofdoom: Opening of the day again. Who is this Makagonov? I couldn't find him in the database.
Dec-06-07  pawnofdoom: Opening of the day again. Who is this Makagonov? I couldn't find him in the database.
Dec-06-07  Open Defence: Vladimir Andreevich Makogonov

Vladimir Andreevich Makogonov born 1904 was awarded the IM title in 1950 and an Honorary GM title in 1987. Many times Champion of Azerbaijan he played in eight USSR Championships between 1927 and 1947. He shared 5th place with Mikhail Botvinnik in 1927, was 4th in 1937, 4th= in 1939 and 5th in 1944. In tournaments he was 3rd= at Leningrad-Moscow 1939 and 2nd at Sverdlovsk 1943. Perhaps he is best known for his contributions to Opening theory in the King's Indian Defence and the Queen's Gambit.

Nov-22-08  Kaspykov: i used to play that system, mainly because i like my dark bishop on e3 and this positional move prevent Ng4
May-31-09  Amarande: Indeed, I think it's much more about Ng4 than about Bg4 as <Alchemist> suggested ...

Against Bg4, White has other potential counters, such as developing Nge2 rather than Nf3; from e2, the Knight still has a number of reasonable futures (if White plays O-O-O, Ng3 is good, supporting the h-pawn advance as well as a potential g-file opening sac via g4 and Nf5; if he plays O-O, there is always Nc1-b3 to support the frequent Queen's side advance with c5).

On the other hand, there's little else to do about Ng4 but prevent the move entirely. Where can the Bishop really develop other than e3?

* Bd2 (or b3 and Bb2) don't contribute anything to the major White strategic plans.

* Bf4 will simply result in the B being driven off in most variations, as Black plays e5 at some future point. Thus, it is virtually a waste of a tempo, and does not ultimately solve the problem of the White Bishop.

* Bg5 has little merit, unless White's intent for the Bishop is to trade it for Black's via Qd2 and Bh6 (in which case, Be3 is just as suitable a preliminary, moreover, White will possibly have to play h3 anyhow, else Ng4, once the pin is broken, prevents Bh6). The pin simply isn't that strong against the fianchetto, as Black can move the Queen away from the pin without pain, answering Bxf6 simply with Bxf6. (By contrast, in openings where Black does not fianchetto, this pin is very strong because Black must often simply suffer from it, as the Queen's overriding duty becomes to be able to recapture on f6 to save Black from a major and frequently fatal Kingside weakening that would occur otherwise after Bxf6 gxf6, and this duty cannot usually be maintained without remaining in the pin) Nor can White usually reinforce the pin well, because in most KID lines the center tends to become blocked, depriving White of e4 and d5 for a Knight; the only square a Knight can reinforce the pin from thus being the awkward g4.

The upshot is that Bg5 seems to give very little benefit besides delaying Black's eventual ... f5 a few moves, as he must first move the Queen before removing the Knight.

* Ba3 (after b3) is potentially good, *if* the usual blocked Pawn center occurs. If it does, this may even be superior to Be3, since from a3 the Bishop directly pressures Black's base (d6) and thus combines very well with the Pawn advance c5. Otherwise, the Bishop is probably misplaced here.

In summary, it seems that in very many strategic plans for White, Be3 is probably the best development for the Bishop, and thus preventing Black from disrupting this with Ng4 is worth a tempo.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Opening of the Day

King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
1.d4 ♘f6 2.c4 g6 3.♘c3 ♗g7 4.e4 d6 5.h3

click for larger view

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific opening and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC