< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·
|Apr-24-16|| ||zanzibar: <MissS> Dude, what's up with that linK?|
|Apr-24-16|| ||MissScarlett: The linking is not to my liking. You'll have to find it yourself: http://digitalcollections.library.c...|
|Apr-24-16|| ||zanzibar: A little bit of kvetching begins the article on ~ v78 N18 (1931.09.11) p66:|
<How Benny Leonard Explains Jewish
By HARRY CONZEL
Outstanding Jewish Sports Writer
The reviewer of the Jewish sport year must hang his
head because of the definite downfall of Jewish champions
in every branch of sport. Harry Conzel and Benny Leonard
tell us why Jewish topnotchers in sports are becoming
scarcer just now.
A little later the "outstanding" writer finally gets around to Kashdan...
<But America saw one real Jewish
champion emerge last year. You
openair fans will shrug your shoulders
when I mention his name. Probably
you will frown and say: "Chess isn't
a sport, anyhow." Perhaps you are
right. But the question of whether or
not chess is a sport is too complicated
to discuss on a hot summer day.
In any case, chess is to be found on
the sports page, and you'll accept it
as a sport—and like it. Now, the boy
who has come through is none other
than I. Kashdan, the New York player
who on his first trip to Europe,
last year, came back with flying colors.
Experts like Charles Jaffe, himself
once a great master, insist that
Kashdan is ripe for a title match with
Dr. Alekhine. Until this year Kashdan
was playing in minor New York
City tournaments, and did not reveal
his real strength until he was confronted
by the best players of Europe.
Now, whenever Frank Marshall,
official champion of the United States,
will give Kashdan the opportunity to
play him for the title, we shall have
a new national champion here. Yes ?
Rather a poor consolation for you
gridiron, boxing and baseball fans—
but chess is the only sport where we
have not only held our own but made
advances and discovered new blood.
It is also rumored that when the
game of ping-pong, or table tennis,
will be given recognized standing in
the world of sport, the Jews will
capture all honors. In this game
which is to tennis what miniature
golf is to real golf it seems, from a
personal investigation, that we have
the best talents. Take it from me—
the time is not far off when pingpong
will be prominently displayed
on your sports page.
The other day I was discussing this
strange downfall of the Jews in
sport with none other than our own
Benny Leonard. "How come," I
asked Benny, who besides being an
artist in the ring is one of the brainiest
sport thinkers in the business,
"that we Jews seem to have reached
our peak in sports some years ago,
and now are on the down grade?"
Said Benny: "Sport is a strange
business when you think of it in racial
or national terms. It goes in
cycles, if you know what I mean.
There was a time when the Negro
dominated the field; one Jack Johnson
acted as the inspiration, and suddenly
colored champions sprang up
in practically every branch of sport.
Then, after a few years, another race
comes to the fore. At the time of
Carpentier, the French had a number
of other champions in boxing, race
and track—you remember Bouin and
Andres ? At another time it was
the Italians who hoarded all the
glory, with Dundee and Mandell in
boxing, and also in soccer. Irish and
Jews have had their day. Now, I
think, the Germans will have their
inning. Just watch what Max
Schmeling's victory over Stribling
will do for the Germans. I shouldn't
be surprised to see the Germans run
away with the Olympic games in
1932. That's how it works—it goes
in cycles. Jews will have another period
of success in sports; it may be
just around the corner, and it may
come in ten years. After all, we had
Lenglen, Abrahams, the Hakoahs and
Benny Friedman almost all at once
That's enough, isn't it?"
I nodded. Maybe this lull in Jewish
sport prowess is a good thing. We
had grown too cocky, perhaps. Besides,
recently we have become more
interested in the body of the average
youth—which makes for a healthier
people, if fewer champions.>
|Apr-24-16|| ||zanzibar: As for Missy's original article, try this:
|Apr-25-16|| ||MissScarlett: Is that strictly legal? And where's the concluding section?|
|Apr-25-16|| ||zanzibar: <MissS> writes...
<Is that strictly legal?>
If a published, pre-1963, non-renewed then yes:
Plus CMU allows the PDF to be freely downloaded.
But copyright law is complicated, and the above should not be construed as legal advice.
<And where's the concluding section?>
I would suggest cleaning off your glasses and giving it another look (if not a read).
|Apr-25-16|| ||zanzibar: BTW- can we get a margin call in?
Kashdan's photo looks chintzy⁽¹⁾ with the top margin uneven like that (imo). I know that's how the wiki photo is, but can't we do better?
Either crop it or even it out with photoshop ink-stamp, would be my suggestion.
* * * * *
(1) <chintz (n.) 1719, plural of chint (1610s), from Hindi chint, from Sanskrit chitra-s "clear, bright" (compare cheetah). The plural (the more common form of the word in commercial use) became regarded as singular by late 18c., and for unknown reason shifted -s to -z; perhaps after quartz. Disparaging sense, from the commonness of the fabric, is first recorded 1851 in George Eliot (in chintzy).>
(s->z transistions are z-approved, btw)
|Apr-25-16|| ||MissScarlett: <I would suggest cleaning off your glasses and giving it another look>|
Yes. I'd just rolled out of bed at an ungodly hour and was on my Ipad Mini.
|May-30-16|| ||Marcelo Bruno: Did he have a profession besides his chess career?|
|May-30-16|| ||perfidious: The Wikipedia link above notes that Kashdan went into the insurance field to make a living.|
|Nov-19-16|| ||TheFocus: Happy birthday, Isaac Kashdan!|
|Nov-19-16|| ||Petrosianic: And many more!|
|Nov-18-18|| ||Cheapo by the Dozen: He was my tournament director in a California Junior Championship. I was a little bit awestruck. But I did tell him of agreeing to a quick "grandmaster draw". He did not seem to approve. :)|
It was perhaps a good strategy in retrospect. That tournament was a bit of an endurance slog, and I did wind up winning the prize for my age group.
|Nov-18-18|| ||Diocletian: Happy Birthday, Isaac.
I remember this game Kashdan vs O Tenner, 1934 from my childhood. It appeared as a "chess movie" in one of I.A. Horowitz series of elementary opening books.
click for larger view
You can also see Kashdan on you tube Groucho Marx show, "You bet your life." Someone on this page left a link. somewhere
|Dec-14-18|| ||Diocletian: WHITE TO MOVE
Diagram above is after 20...Qd6.
|Dec-14-18|| ||moronovich: 21.Bc7|
|Dec-14-18|| ||Cibator: <FSR: <zdigyigy: Very rare to see such a strong player become a TD.>
GM Lothar Schmid was the arbiter for the Fischer-Spassky World Championship match. I believe that Gligoric was the arbiter for their 1992 rematch.>|
Add to the above:
1960: Stahlberg (assisted by Golombek)
1966: O'Kelly de Galway and Filip
These are off the top of my head. It's proved surprisingly hard to find out quickly who was arbiter at other WCMs!
|Dec-14-18|| ||Olavi: The strongest was perhaps Vidmar in 1948, he was World number 4-6 for some time in the 20', I'd say.|
|Dec-15-18|| ||Caissanist: Max Euwe was also a TD, though the only tournament that I know he directed was the 1956 Candidates.|
|Dec-15-18|| ||gezafan: According to Chessmetrics Kashdan was the number 2 player in the world in the early 1930s.|
|Dec-15-18|| ||Olavi: Yes. That highlights one problem with chessmetrics. Capablanca had dropped entirely due to inactivity, and if you look at Kashdan's results before those 1933 lists, I think it's clear that he wasn't number two. But he was considered a possible challenger.|
|Dec-15-18|| ||Caissanist: Kashdan's high ranking in the early 1930s is mostly a reflection of the fact that there were virtually no great players born between 1892 and 1911, unless Euwe counts. Most of the top players of the early 1930s had fallen back from the top by the end of that decade, never to returns.|
|Dec-15-18|| ||perfidious: Had never really given that gap much thought, in contradistinction to the oft-mentioned period from 1936-1951 which featured the birth of no top-class player except Fischer (Spassky was born in 1937, it is true, but made his ascent before Tal).|
It was only when Botvinnik, Reshevsky, Keres, Flohr and Fine came into their own by 1935 that the old guard began to fade away.
|Dec-18-18|| ||Caissanist: If you consider Flohr to be a great player, then I guess you'd have to move the date up from 1911 to 1908. I don't--his best days were already behind him by 1937, when he was only 28, so he seems to be another beneficiary of the lack of strong competition in the early to mid thirties.|
|Dec-18-18|| ||perfidious: Flohr scored some fine results in the early thirties and Alekhine tipped him as a potential challenger in an interview ca 1932 (cf Sergeant). Does this make him great? I rather doubt that also, though possibly Flohr's best result came at Leningrad-Moscow 1939, shortly after having been all but written off as a title contender due to finishing as bottom marker at AVRO.|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·