chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile

VerySeriousExpert
Member since Jun-25-21 · Last seen Jun-14-25
no bio
>> Click here to see VerySeriousExpert's game collections.

   VerySeriousExpert has kibitzed 385 times to chessgames   [more...]
   May-28-25 G Marencev vs B Ilievski, 1971 (replies)
 
VerySeriousExpert: White could resign earlier in this Nimzo-Indian game.
 
   May-06-25 Gramatikov vs J Dubois, 1996 (replies)
 
VerySeriousExpert: 16...Qc7?? attracts attention, and 3...Bb4? 4.c3 Bc5? attracks attention: it is one of the strangest games.
 
   Apr-24-25 M I Botvinnik vs T L Petrosian, 1998
 
VerySeriousExpert: Yes, new Botvinnik vs new Petrosian... And several chess games of new Anatoly Karpovs (Sr. and Jr.) can be found on jeromegambit.blogspot.com . For example: https://jeromegambit.blogspot.com/2... .
 
   Apr-14-25 AlphaZero vs Stockfish, 2017 (replies)
 
VerySeriousExpert: "Funny game can show you bright How weak is engine's mind!" (Yury Bukayev)
 
   Apr-12-25 S F Smith vs A Tietjen, 1898 (replies)
 
VerySeriousExpert: But there is also a probability that Smith solved to make these moves very quickly, without enough attention
 
   Apr-08-25 W Ju vs Z Tan, 2025
 
VerySeriousExpert: When evaluating 69...Bd5 as a bad way I thought about 70.Rd8!? Bxf3 71.Re8+! Kd5 72.Kf6! with the possibility of Kxf7.
 
   Apr-04-25 A G Jakobsen vs I Carlsen, 2007
 
VerySeriousExpert: Another pun suggestion is: "Beat M-s Carlsen easily, no role, Magnus or Miss"
 
   Apr-04-25 Karpov vs Larsen, 1978 (replies)
 
VerySeriousExpert: B.Larsen's 7...h5? is very strange.
 
   Mar-26-25 A Goorsahye vs P Vilaphen, 2022
 
VerySeriousExpert: It is one of Evans-Bukayev gambits.
 
   Mar-25-25 Hikaru Nakamura (replies)
 
VerySeriousExpert: Was Hikaru Nakamura right in his rapturous words about the standard system of the Jerome gambit? Yury V. Bukayev has made the following new sensational analysis of Jerome gambit and found that Mr. Nakamura was right even in the case of playing 4.Bxf7+ against enough strong
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC