Aug-28-07 Ernest F Pecci 
| |
| adnol: Who is this guy? I've never heard of him before. |
|
|
|
Aug-27-07 Kibitzer's Café
| |
| adnol: <<adnol> You should have a check box that allows you to select, and join the Najdorf tournament. And there is one slot open, still.> Hey wannabe, now I see. The list of games shows up in my 'my games' I didn't know that previously. I thought I have to initialize every game |
|
|
|
Aug-26-07 Topalov vs Carlsen, 2007
| |
| adnol: Why the heck did black resign? |
|
|
|
Aug-26-07 Anand vs Svidler, 2007
| |
| adnol: Interesting game. Did svidler resign because of his rather badly positioned pieces? 3 of his middle-game important minor pieces are unprotected within a reach of the white's queen. Was this the case? Thanks for all your input, |
|
|
|
Aug-24-07 Rubinstein vs Lasker, 1909
| |
| adnol: hey everyone, why wouldn't rubinstein play 14. Nc7+ and fork the king and a rook? anyone? Thanks, |
|
|
|
Aug-21-07 P Korzubov vs Kasparov, 1977
| |
| adnol: Thought only I am capable of such mistakes :-)
Korzubov almost had Kasparov in this one :-) |
|
|
|
Aug-20-07 T Taylor vs J Becerra Rivero, 2005
| |
| adnol: What do you guys think about 27. h2+ as a best move for white? How would this alter the game for both white and black, and wouldn't this cause rather serious trouble for black? Thanks for all the replies, |
|
|
|
Aug-20-07 Pachman vs Guimard, 1955
| |
| adnol: Ugly game, I don't like game where by 20th move all pieces but pawns and 1-2 minors are left out. Hmm Why not 9. Qd3, followed by Qc4+ for white? There's probably something I don't see, but it seems to me, white forks black's queen and king afterwards and there's no good way to avoid ... |
|
|
|
Aug-20-07 Larsen vs Spassky, 1964
| |
| adnol: Hey everyone,
What about
44. Rg7+ for Larsen
Would this be a bad move? It wins him either a queen for a rook and a knight, putting his king in "safety" or otherwise wins him a knight and a pawn, if black doesn't accept the queen lose by Rxe7, Qxe6, although it puts white's king ... |
|
|
|
Aug-19-07 Petrosian vs Spassky, 1966
| |
| adnol: it may sound slightly ridiculous or unreal, but I think 21. Ne3 deserves !! It's a fine-little defensive move to protect his king from perpetual checks in later stages, and I even think Petrosian saw the Qg5+ right here, and the upcoming fork. What do you guys think about 21. ... |
|
|
|
| indicates a reply to the comment. |
|
Kibitzing