chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

 
Chessgames.com User Profile

adnol
Member since Jul-02-07 · Last seen Feb-20-08
no bio

   adnol has kibitzed 28 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Aug-28-07 Ernest F Pecci (replies)
 
adnol: Who is this guy? I've never heard of him before.
 
   Aug-27-07 Kibitzer's Café (replies)
 
adnol: <<adnol> You should have a check box that allows you to select, and join the Najdorf tournament. And there is one slot open, still.> Hey wannabe, now I see. The list of games shows up in my 'my games' I didn't know that previously. I thought I have to initialize every game
 
   Aug-26-07 Topalov vs Carlsen, 2007 (replies)
 
adnol: Why the heck did black resign?
 
   Aug-26-07 Anand vs Svidler, 2007 (replies)
 
adnol: Interesting game. Did svidler resign because of his rather badly positioned pieces? 3 of his middle-game important minor pieces are unprotected within a reach of the white's queen. Was this the case? Thanks for all your input,
 
   Aug-24-07 Rubinstein vs Lasker, 1909 (replies)
 
adnol: hey everyone, why wouldn't rubinstein play 14. Nc7+ and fork the king and a rook? anyone? Thanks,
 
   Aug-21-07 P Korzubov vs Kasparov, 1977 (replies)
 
adnol: Thought only I am capable of such mistakes :-) Korzubov almost had Kasparov in this one :-)
 
   Aug-20-07 T Taylor vs J Becerra Rivero, 2005 (replies)
 
adnol: What do you guys think about 27. h2+ as a best move for white? How would this alter the game for both white and black, and wouldn't this cause rather serious trouble for black? Thanks for all the replies,
 
   Aug-20-07 Pachman vs Guimard, 1955 (replies)
 
adnol: Ugly game, I don't like game where by 20th move all pieces but pawns and 1-2 minors are left out. Hmm Why not 9. Qd3, followed by Qc4+ for white? There's probably something I don't see, but it seems to me, white forks black's queen and king afterwards and there's no good way to avoid ...
 
   Aug-20-07 Larsen vs Spassky, 1964 (replies)
 
adnol: Hey everyone, What about 44. Rg7+ for Larsen Would this be a bad move? It wins him either a queen for a rook and a knight, putting his king in "safety" or otherwise wins him a knight and a pawn, if black doesn't accept the queen lose by Rxe7, Qxe6, although it puts white's king ...
 
   Aug-19-07 Petrosian vs Spassky, 1966 (replies)
 
adnol: it may sound slightly ridiculous or unreal, but I think 21. Ne3 deserves !! It's a fine-little defensive move to protect his king from perpetual checks in later stages, and I even think Petrosian saw the Qg5+ right here, and the upcoming fork. What do you guys think about 21. ...
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC