Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing User Profile

Member since Dec-12-05 · Last seen Aug-01-18
you need to play chess every day or you get rusty and blunder a lot. playing blitz seems to make your OTB game worse. but this might not apply to everyone. solving puzzles help a lot. chess is really hard game, even for the very best players, and even the best chess engines sometimes can't solve a simple mate in 2. so take on the challenge!

the two quickest and most effective ways to improve in chess is to study endgames and study the chess of grandmasters. i prefer bishops over knight in most cases. a pair of bishops is as strong as a pair of rooks, and stronger than bishop+knight, which is stronger than 2 knights. in correspondence chess games, i try to make the best move, but in OTB games, I just try to get the opponent to make mistakes. most players are very strong in tactics, but have never study the endgame, so i try to simplify to the endgame early to one that is in my favor. Rook and pawn endgames are especially important. Endgame study is really tough but the most rewarding as it can get you the most wins.

Studying the Opening beyond the first 5 moves is overrated. In correspondence games, you can think up of your own opening moves as you go along, because you can analyze a lot of variations. In some games where you are allowed to use the help of a computer engine, you can definately make figure out good moves that may be superior to just looking up a database. I think only at the highest levels of OTB play is Opening theory memorization important, so just know the general principles and save your time.

   cotdt has kibitzed 2900 times to chessgames   [more...]
   May-04-10 Anand - Topalov World Championship Match (2010) (replies)
cotdt: I just woke up how many hours till it start?
   Nov-11-09 Tal Memorial (2009) (replies)
cotdt: How many more hours?
   Jun-16-09 Bazna Tournament (2009) (replies)
cotdt: Nisipeanu should not have been invited to this tournament! He has no fighting spirit.
   Feb-23-09 Topalov vs Kamsky, 2009 (replies)
cotdt: <radu stancu: Maybe they're changing colors mid-match?> FIDE would never do such a thing!
   Feb-21-09 Kamsky vs Topalov, 2009 (replies)
cotdt: Looking good... go Kamsky!
   Feb-17-09 Kamsky vs Topalov, 2009 (replies)
cotdt: go gata go!
   Feb-12-09 Topalov - Kamsky Candidates Final (2009) (replies)
cotdt: Kamsky is going to explode and win!
   Jan-24-09 Van Wely vs Carlsen, 2009 (replies)
cotdt: i'll say it again: Van Wely sucks!!!
   Jan-24-09 Corus Group A (2009) (replies)
cotdt: i like kamsky's position
   Jan-19-09 Carlsen vs Movsesian, 2009 (replies)
cotdt: carlsen has a bishop pair and the initiative
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC