chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

 
Chessgames.com User Profile

gollum70
Member since Jul-31-04 · Last seen Jan-13-06
no bio

   gollum70 has kibitzed 32 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Aug-30-04 A Planinc vs D Baretic, 1968 (replies)
 
gollum70: The blind man saw among other things that if Bxc4 (on White's 26th or 28th move) there is the devastating d3!
 
   Aug-29-04 Nigel Short (replies)
 
gollum70: LOL <azaris>
 
   Aug-29-04 Paul Morphy (replies)
 
gollum70: <SBC> Winter's clarification on the Steinitz/Morphy "affaire" (visibly on our friend's <Lawrence>'s indications) : http://www.chesscafe.com/winter/win...
 
   Aug-29-04 Spassky vs Y Sakharov, 1960 (replies)
 
gollum70: Nigel Short on this game (and the King's Gambit in general) : http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/mai...
 
   Aug-28-04 M Watai vs Xu Jun, 1999
 
gollum70: David Norwood gives two positions from her games in his Telegraph column today http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/mai... To me, it looks like 1800 Elo chess ...
 
   Aug-21-04 Tal vs Botvinnik, 1960 (replies)
 
gollum70: 72.-Qb2+ 73.Ke6 Qe2+ 74.Qe5! forces either mate or the exchange of queens.
 
   Aug-13-04 F Thorbergsson vs Tal, 1964 (replies)
 
gollum70: Threat is 37.-Bg4+ 38.Ke4 f5 mate. If 37.Bg3 Qe3 mate. If 37.Bc1 Qg4+ 38.Kf2 Qg2+ 39.Ke1 Qg3+ 40.Ke2 Bg4+ 41.Kd2 Qe3 mate. If 37.Bh6 g5! Looks like a composition !
 
   Aug-11-04 Tartakower vs F Villard, 1937 (replies)
 
gollum70: White's 18th move would do for a nice puzzle !
 
   Aug-09-04 Howard Staunton (replies)
 
gollum70: <Mr Keene> If you haven't, you should read JRRT's collected Letters. Obviously yours isn't in :-) but you'll find that anti-nazi correspondance and a lot more : witty, wise, cristal-clear english language and deep ethics. For those who don't see a "point to the story" (like ...
 
   Aug-09-04 Kasparov vs Salov, 1989 (replies)
 
gollum70: <Jim Bartle> If you are still there, i'd be highly interested to read some of that Informant analysis. Garry's play is a masterwork of relentless activity, but is it really a forced win (say after 17.e5!??) ? And what happens on 17.-dxe5 ?
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC