chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

OhioChessFan
Member since Apr-09-05 · Last seen Jan-20-21
______________ Moves Prediction Contest

<Main Focus>: Predicting how many moves in a game for each pairing.

Chessgames.com tournament page:
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches...

Official site: http://

Live games:
http://www.nrk.no/sport/sjakk/

Alternative live games: http://worldchess.com/broadcasts/eu...

***Hall of Fame***
chessmoron chessforum

<Format>:

[player]-[player] [result] [# of MOVES]

==4 Different Scoring Methods==

Standard Moves Ranker (1st place-Over[3pts], 1st place-Under [7pts], Exact [10pts])

Bonus Ranker (3rd place-Over[1pts],2nd place-Over[2pts],3rd place-Under [5pts], 2nd place-Under [6pts]

Standard Moves/Bonus Ranker [Add all to together]

1st place Ranker [how many 1st place you have in Standard Moves Ranker]

For example:

<Note: Participants 3, 4, and 5 are predicated on nobody scoring an exact as Participant 2 did. If someone hits an exact, the closest score under and over will score the points for second place.>

Actual Game: [player]-[player] 0-1 45

Participant 1: [player]-[player] 1/2 45
Participant 2: [player]-[player] 0-1 45
Participant 3: [player]-[player] 0-1 44
Participant 4: [player]-[player] 0-1 43
Participant 5: [player]-[player] 0-1 46

Participant 1: No points even though 45 is correct. Results must be correct. If Result is wrong and moves # is correct...you get no points whatsoever

Participant 2: 10 pts rewarded for correct Result/moves #

Participant 3: 7 pts rewarded for closest under (1st-Under) to 45 moves

Participant 4: 6 pts rewarded for the 2nd closest under (2nd-Under) to 45 moves.

Participant 5: 3 pts rewarded closest OVER(1st-OVER) to 45 moves.

Again, the description of Participant 3, 4, and 5 are based on there being no exact prediction as made by Participant 2.

<IF> there is an exact or an under closest, the highest scoring over participant will be 2nd over. The second closest over will be 3rd over. The <ONLY> time there will be a first over is if there is no exact or under winner.

Things To Look At:
1. Game Collection: 1975 World Junior chess championship
2. Ongoing edits Vladimir Fedorovich Ostrogsky
3. Bio Adolf Zytogorski
4. Complete the Olympiad
5. Bio Lorenz Maximilian Drabke
6. Jonas Buhl Bjerre
7. Baden-Baden (1870)
8. Edit History: Alexander Reprintsev
9. Jim Eade

>> Click here to see ohiochessfan's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member
   Current net-worth: 792 chessbucks
[what is this?]

   OhioChessFan has kibitzed 43495 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jan-20-21 Kenneth Rogoff (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: <Tomlinsky: This 'pardons' stuff is pure bollocks in a democracy claiming equality and justice as part of its backbone. It's like something from Pirates of the Caribbean.> <As of Nov. 23, Trump had granted clemency 44 times, including 28 pardons and 16 commutations. ...
 
   Jan-19-21 N Grandelius vs Harikrishna, 2021 (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: With Black, I'd have had a panic attack trying to rescue my DSB.
 
   Jan-19-21 OhioChessFan chessforum (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: Djobov Karjakin 2015531 10 8 10 28 Caruana Firouzja 1990573 10 Caruana Carlsen 1997195 10 2014669 10 Caruana Firouzja 1990573 10 Fedoseev Firouzja 9 2012808 Caruana Firouzja 1990573 9 Caruana Carlsen 1997256 9 Suleymanli Smirin 1992537 8 Harikrishna Carlsen ...
 
   Jan-19-21 Tata Steel (2021) (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: In order, here's who I see as the most likely to dethrone Carlsen. 1. Ferocious Ali 2. Ding 3. Caruana 4. So
 
   Jan-19-21 playground player chessforum (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: <pp: And the Pharisees? I don't know. At his trial, Paul appealed to the Pharisees in the audience and they supported him. They believed in *a* resurrection; but maybe they couldn't believe in Jesus' bodily resurrection. What they would have thought if they'd seen him ...
 
   Jan-19-21 Big Pawn chessforum (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: Chess and poker players make a living of entertainment.
 
   Jan-18-21 Golden Executive chessforum (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: Carlsen trading Queens with White tells me he didn't take his opponent seriously. Vachier-Lagrave - Anton Guijarro 1-0 Aryan - Firouzja 1/2 Van Foreest - Carlsen 1/2 Donchenko - Wojtaszek 1/2 Duda - Giri 1/2 Harikrishna - Caruana 1/2 Esipenko - Grandelius 1/2
 
   Jan-18-21 bgitw chessforum
 
OhioChessFan: I have been hoping for more response but I'll go with it tomorrow.
 
   Jan-18-21 Popovych vs E Formanek, 1969
 
OhioChessFan: Nice pun.
 
   Jan-18-21 chessgames.com chessforum (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: Huh. I can delete.
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Moves Prediction Contest

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 799 OF 799 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-04-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: I am reminded of the LDS, who encourage their adherents to pray to God to show them if it's the true faith. What an obvious a priori fallacy. Who says that we need to know the church history? The Orthodox (Or Catholics if the case may be) say we do. Oh. Well. I guess there was a period of time when there really wasn't a church history. Did those poor souls have no way of being saved?
Jan-07-21  Jambow: <OCF> Hey I noticed that you never respond to what I post or so it appears at least.

I would like to say I have always appreciated your perspective and if I did something to offend you in anyway I apologize. If not and my posts were just mundane and unworthy that is ok too. I sometimes give my 2 cents worth and that is always far above market value.

God Bless and Happy New Year.

Jan-07-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <Jambow> no problems at all with you. I saw your recent post on <BP>'s page but didn't respond yet. That place tends to be quiet for a while, then get overly busy, then settles back down. I try to limit posting when it's really busy. Anyway, zero problems here. God bless you and Happy New Year.
Jan-08-21  Jambow: Thanks and God bless...
Jan-11-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: <Oh. Well. I guess there was a period of time when there really wasn't a church history.>

When?

Jan-12-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: The first few years.
Jan-12-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: Acts does not count?
Jan-12-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: No.
 
Jan-13-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: Why not? It contains lots of early church history. Can we not believe Luke's record?
Jan-13-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <tga: Why not? >

Because it wasn't part of the written record for 30 years or so during the church's early years.

<It contains lots of early church history.>

Yes.

< Can we not believe Luke's record?>

We can believe it.

Jan-13-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: I will note the rather strange appeal to the written word you invoke when discussing church history. That's <my> argument to make.
Jan-14-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: <OhioChessFan: I will note the rather strange appeal to the written word you invoke when discussing church history. That's <my> argument to make.>

Then I guess you haven't understood my position. That's why you were surprised when I agreed someone could pick up a bible, read and obey it, and receive salvation.

< OhioChessFan:

< Can we not believe Luke's record?>

We can believe it.>

OK, now I see your point. I didn't see it before, because it seems strange to state it that way.

IMO it would be much clearer to just say we didn't have a written record of early church history until Luke wrote Acts. Although in that case, the assertion <still> cannot be validated.

Jan-14-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <IMO it would be much clearer to just say we didn't have a written record of early church history until Luke wrote Acts. >

You're the one trying to shoehorn 30 years into my reference of "first few years". I went with it.

<Although in that case, the assertion <still> cannot be validated.>

I have no idea what this means.

Jan-15-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  Golden Executive: Pairings Tata Steel Masters 2021
Round 1

Harikrishna - Vachier-Lagrave
Esipenko - Duda
Grandelius - Donchenko
Caruana - Van Foreest
Giri - Aryan
Wojtaszek - Anton
Carlsen - Firouzja

Just in case <chessmoron> and <OCF> decide to do the contest.

In my forum the <Game Prediction Contest for Tata Steel Masters 2021> is open right now and everybody is welcome!!!

Jan-15-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Thanks <GE> We'd need a last minute appearance of <chessmoron> Or maybe start with the second round.
Jan-15-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: <OhioChessFan:

<Although in that case, the assertion <still> cannot be validated.>

I have no idea what this means.>

Bob of Jerusalem was a young man when Christ was preaching in the synagogues. Bob saw healings and casting out of demons, and believed in Christ.

After Pentecost, Bob of Jerusalem heard the apostles' teaching, and joined the early church, just weeks after Christ's ascension. He started recording the history of the church just a few months after the ascension.

Two years later, Bob got married and started a family. Five years after the day of Pentecost Bob's 3-year-old son found Bob's scrolls, and tore them into confetti to throw into the wind, for amusement, because sometimes little boys like to do such things.

We can neither prove, nor disprove, this. We cannot validate, nor can we invalidate, history.

There may have been a history of the early church that never survived the ancient times.

Jan-15-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: And...

May God bless you and keep you, <OCF>, I pray.

Jan-15-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  Golden Executive: <OhioChessFan: Thanks <GE> We'd need a last minute appearance of <chessmoron> Or maybe start with the second round.>

Yes, it's a long tournament so I think it is not big deal to start here a little bit later.

I hope <chessmoron> can read this.

Jan-16-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  lostemperor: No contest here?
Jan-17-21  chessmoron: Sorry guys. I'm a little preoccupied in the next few weeks. Putting a ring on my bride to be. :D
Jan-17-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  WinKing: Great to hear <chessmoron>. I wish you both the best!
Jan-17-21  chessmoron: <WinKing> Thanks for the wedding wishes for me and my bride. Nerve wracking but worthwhile.
Jan-19-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Here's some actual photos of the ceremony:

https://www.google.com/imgres?imgur...

Jan-19-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Djobov Karjakin 2015531 10 8 10 28
Caruana Firouzja 1990573 10
Caruana Carlsen 1997195 10
2014669 10
Caruana Firouzja 1990573 10
Fedoseev Firouzja 9 2012808
Caruana Firouzja 1990573 9
Caruana Carlsen 1997256 9
Suleymanli Smirin 1992537 8
Harikrishna Carlsen 2010602 8
Jan-19-21  chessmoron: <OhioChessFan> Haha. Pretty much.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 799)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 799 OF 799 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Participating Grandmasters are Not Allowed Here!

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC