< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 1 OF 284 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Nov-30-02 | | Sylvester: Does anyone think that Morphy is still the greatest player of all time? |
|
Nov-30-02 | | Samuel Maverick: Fischer ranked him number one thirty years ago. They have more in common than Fischer may have suspected at the time. |
|
Dec-01-02 | | PVS: It is not an unreasonable choice. |
|
Dec-01-02 | | Kenneth Sterling: Staunton treated him very badly. |
|
Dec-01-02 | | Sylvester: Can anyone suggest a good book on Paul Morphy with a biography and games in algebraic notation? |
|
Dec-01-02 | | pawntificator: There are many of them. My favorite biography, although it didn't carry many games, was The Chess Players, a partially fictionalized account of his life. It throws in an unsubstantiated twist that would help to explain his regretable spiral into the netherworlds of insanity. I would suggest going to your local library and having them order some books for you. |
|
Dec-01-02 | | Bob Radford: Morphy was without doubt the greatest player of the 19th century, and perhaps only a few could live with from the 20th century i.e. Fischer Kasparov and Capablanca, in long matches. |
|
Dec-01-02 | | PVS: I disagree about The Chess Players as a suitable introduction in this case. Let's not begin the debunking process ab initio. The Pride and Sorrow of Chess by David Lawson is the first book I read on Morphy. It is a true biography. There are some games, and unless it has been reprinted, they will appear in descriptive notation. There is a biographical section in Sergeant's standard collection of Morphy's games, again unless it has been reprinted no algebraic. Morphy's secretary, Edge, wrote an account of the European triumphs, casting Staunton as the devil. The only recent book on Morphy (i.e. sure to be in algebraic) that I am aware of is called Paul Morphy and the Evolution of Chess Theory. |
|
Dec-11-02 | | refutor: drukenknight...about a month ago you commented on how it was funny that 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 was called the "morphy defense" but morphy never played it...well i was doing some research yesterday and it turns out that this website was missing some of his games...he did play 3. ... a6 quite a few times and very successfully...i believe those games have been added :) |
|
Dec-11-02 | | drukenknight: Yes, someone else (or maybe you?) mentioned this when I first brought it up. I had read that somewhere and always wondered about it. Similar to my MCO 1957 book that says Philidor never played Philidor's defense. Oh yes he did. |
|
Jan-10-03 | | pawntificator: Maybe chess is just a big waste, maybe we are wasting our time when we could be thinking of creative solutions to the worlds problems. It's up to us, people! Sell all your worldy belongings and travel to the poorest part of your country and feed the children! Don't give your money to some charity, rather, give your life to the needy! I'll go first. |
|
Jan-10-03 | | ughaibu: A rather more obscure book but Paul Morphy is also mentioned in Rossi's 'The Sex Life Of The Foot And Shoe', it seems at his death he had a collection of about 200 pairs of women's shoes. |
|
Jan-10-03 | | mdorothy: Well, even if chess is a waste, and even if we could use the time much more effectivly to solve world problems.. knowing the world, they wouldnt want them then... everythings screwed up. |
|
Jan-11-03 | | pawntificator: <everythings screwed up> I don't think there is any arguing with you there. |
|
Feb-05-03 | | evansgambit: All of morphys games can be found at http://www.xs4all.nl/~timkr/ChessTu... |
|
Mar-29-03
 | | Sneaky: Morphy is often credited with the idea of quick-development in the opening; but this was certainly not his invention, and if you look at his games, you see that his opponents were not ignorant of this principle! In my opinion, Morphy's real contribution is that he advanced the art of attack, nearly to its pinnacle even by today's standards. |
|
Mar-30-03
 | | BishopBerkeley: Dr. Emmanuel Lasker, World Chess Champion for 27 years (I believe) includes this remarkable passage about Paul Morphy in the fourth book of his famous "Manual of Chess": La Bourdonnais [a great player, b. 1795 - d. 1840] died young in London, and the goddess of Chess, Caissa, very much grieved, mourned for him and forgot to inspire the masters with her sunny look. A dreary time then came over the Chess world. The masters played a dry style, without enthusiasm, without imagination, without force, and the Chess fraternity was full of the wrangles of the mediocrities. It is true, the goddess soon repaired her omission. She flirted – Goddess! pardon me this vulgar expression, but the coarse human language does not know the shades of meaning such as undoubtedly you would be able to express by means of Chess pieces – she flirted, I beg to say, with the English historian [and renowned authority on Shakespeare, whose name has been given to the style of Chess pieces we now use] Staunton and prevailed upon him to organize in 1851 an international chess tournament in London, during the great International Exposition of that year. And then – fickle Goddess – she gave her love to a young mathematician, the German Anderssen, and inspired him to superb combinations. And then -- oh the weakness of her – she spied with her great sunny eye in far distant Louisiana a boy, highly talented; she forgot all about Anderssen, guided the steps of the young American, fell in love with him, introduced him to the world and said triumphantly: “Here is the young Paul Morphy, stronger and greater than master ever was.” And the world listened and applauded and cried “Hurrah for Paul Morphy, the King of Chess!” In Paul Morphy the spirit of La Bourdonnais had arisen anew, only more vigorous, firmer, prouder. He never formed columns of Pawns for the purpose of assaulting a firm position as Philidor had taught, he always fought in the centre, only a few Pawns in front, and if he needed the lines open, he sacrificed even these few advanced posts. Should the adversary make use of Philidor’s maxims, Morphy’s pieces occupied the gaps in the oncoming mass of Pawns and opened up an attack, so as to leave the enemy no time for slow, methodical maneuvering. Paul Morphy fought; on good days and on bad days, he loved the contest, the hard, sharp, just struggle, which despises petted favourites and breeds heroes. But then the Civil War broke out in the United States and broke the heart and mind of Morphy. . . . [continued in next message] |
|
Mar-30-03
 | | BishopBerkeley: [continuation of Dr. Lasker on Paul Morphy]:
. . .When Paul Morphy, despairing of Life, renounced Chess, Caissa fell into deep mourning and into dreary thoughts. To the masters who had come to ask her for a smile she listened absent-mindedly, as a mother would to her children after her favourite had died. Therefore, the games of the masters of that period are planless; the great models of the past are known, and the masters try to follow them and to equal them, but they do not succeed. The masters give themselves over to reflection. One of them reflects a long time and intensely on Paul Morphy, and gratefully Caissa encourages him; and the greatest landmark in the history of Chess is reached: William Steinitz announces the principles of strategy, the result of inspired thought and imagination. Principles, though dwelling in the realm of thought, are rooted in Life. There are so many thoughts which have no roots and these are more glittering and more seducive [sic] than the sound ones. Therefore, in order to distinguish between the true and the false principles, Steinitz had to dig deep to lay bare the roots of the art possessed by Morphy. And when Steinitz after hard work had bared these roots, he said to the world: Here is the idea of Chess which has given vitality to the game since its invention in the centuries long past. Listen to me and do not judge rashly, for it is something great, and it overpowers me. . . . . . . The world would have benefitted if it had given Steinitz a chance. He was a thinker worthy of a seat in the halls of a University. A player, as the world believed he as, he was NOT; his studious temperament made that impossible; and thus he was conquered by a PLAYER and in the end little valued by the world, he died. And I who vanquished him must see to it that his great achievement, his theories should find justice, and I must avenge the wrongs he suffered . . . . |
|
Mar-30-03
 | | BishopBerkeley: Sorry (in advance) for the long message!
I don't intend to post such long messages in the future, but this is such a remarkable passage that I thought some of you might enjoy it. I really encourage you to get a copy of "Lasker's Manual of Chess" if only for the rare style of writing he displays. It's available at Amazon.com for $9.00. (An aside: many of you know that Dr. Lasker was a friend of Albert Einstein. Bill Wall has an interesting site about their friendship: http://www.geocities.com/siliconval... ) P.S. Sorry for the length of this apology! :) |
|
Mar-30-03 | | ughaibu: Incredible! Did Lasker really write such crap? Just shows the gulf between ability to play and to expound. |
|
Mar-30-03
 | | BishopBerkeley: It certainly is a strange and remarkable passage, whether you regard it as eloquent or mawkish! Presumably, this is a translation, the writing as it occurs in the English language release of Lasker's Manual. Even so, it's pretty clear that Dr. Lasker had a mythical relationship to the game of Chess! Maybe you have to regard it in this way to get to be one of the very best -- the only way you can justify all that time and energy. (In regard to fickleness, Dr. Lasker went on to play Checkers, Go, and Bridge with considerable achievements in all three. I wonder if each of these games has its own goddess?) |
|
Mar-30-03 | | ughaibu: Caissa is quite a recent introduction and doesn't embody the spirit of these games as they developed through hnefatfl and the like. Not so much a Godess as a romantic fabrication. |
|
Mar-31-03 | | uglybird: <Incredible! Did Lasker really write such crap?>
Lasker a great philosopher and chess champion for 27 years was in my opinion the greatest chess writer ever. I totally agree with Bishop Berkeley about the passage above, and his recomendation of "Lasker's Manual of Chess". It is a powerful and beautiful book, perhaps the greatest chess book ever written. I could point out dozens of remarkable passages from this classic book. Ughaibu, what strange tastes you have, calling this stuff crap! You think Morphy played many bad games, you think Fischer wasn't that good, and now you think Lasker is a crappy writer! What next from you, Capablanca, a poor endgame player? |
|
Mar-31-03 | | ughaibu: Hello Uglybird, how's life? I agree with you that Lasker was a great chess writer and go along with the recommendations of the Manual. However the passage quoted is pretty much nonsense as far as I understand it and I dont think it's improved by the ridiculous fairy tale style. I'll have a look for a Capablanca ending to tease you with. |
|
Apr-04-03
 | | BishopBerkeley: Paul Morphy & Adolf Anderssen
Thanks for your remarks, uglybird & ughaibu, on Dr. Lasker. I totally agree with you, uglybird, Dr. Lasker's Manual is a "powerful and beautiful book". Here is a man whose intelligence clearly ranged over many fields, someone who had though widely and deeply about life's most important questions. I've just posted a message over on the Adolf Anderssen site that contains a few remarks about his contest with Paul Morphy. It has a link to a site with a good biography of Morphy. You might like to check it out: Adolf Anderssen Cheers! |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 1 OF 284 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
|
|
|