chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Leon Rosen vs Amos Burn
Paris (1900), Paris FRA, rd 3, May-21
Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian. General (B57)  ·  0-1
Move:
Last:

explore this opening
find similar games 435 more games of Burn
sac: 59...Rxf4+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Help with kibitzing features can be found on our Kibtizing Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-21-17  Coutinho: Interesting, if 8...dxe5 9 Bxf7+ wins the queen
Jul-16-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: This game is a tragicomedy. Burn mishandled the opening and was probably lost by about move 8. He managed to simplify down to a Bishops of opposite colors ending down a pawn in which he could almost certainly have drawn with ease. Incredibly, somehow Rosen managed to lose this drawn endgame though up a pawn!

After 8. e5, White had a small advantage, and--as noted by Coutinho on this site and by Rosenthal in the Tournament Book--8...dex5 would have been crushed by 9. Bxf7+.

But Burn's 8...d5, though nowhere nearly as bad as 8...dxe5, was not best. (He should have played 8..Ng4). After 9. exf6 dxc4, Rosen would have had a winning advantage after 10. Qf3, the move recommended by Rosenthal. Even after the less accurate 10. QxQ+ KxQ 11. Bg5, Burn was in trouble. His Queen-side pawn structure was a disaster, and White's pawn on f6 was causing him major headaches:


click for larger view

Burn should here have played 11...Kc7, since 12. fxe7 Bxe7 13. BxB allows 13...Re8 regaining the piece with a much better position than in the game. (Rosen would likely have played 12. 0-0-0 after 11...Kc7 and then 12...exf6 would have been much better than the text for Burn).

Instead, Rosen played 11...Be6 and after 12. 0-0-0+ Ke8 Rosen could have had a dominating and probably winning game with 13. Ne4 (as recommended by Rosenthal in the Tournament Book). But played 13. f4 and now Burn was able to get back in the game with 13...h6, 14...Rg8 and 15...g5.

After Burn's 22...Rad8, the position was as follows:


click for larger view

Had Rosen here played 23. bxc3, Burn would have had an immediate draw by perpetual check with 23...Rb8+ 24. Ka1 Bb2+. The only serious chance to play for a win here would have been 23. Rd4. Rosen's actual move, 23. Re3, allowed Burn to exchange down to a drawn Bishop of opposite colors endgame. After Burn's 36...Re8, the game appeared to be as good as drawn:


click for larger view

Amazingly enough, Rosen (White) managed to lose this position. I will recount how this happened in my next post on this game.

Jul-16-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: In the last position shown in my prior post, Rosen had at least a draw for the asking with 37. RxR. His 37. Rg7, though theoretically still allowing him to draw, was asking for trouble, and trouble is what he got.

After 37...Bd3+ 38. Kc1 Ke6 39. d2 Bg6, Rosen's Rook was locked up tight. But it still did not seem possible for Rosen to lose the game. Sometimes, however, truth can be stranger than fiction.

Following Burn's 46...Ra8, the position was as follows:


click for larger view

Rosen has a number of ways to hold this game. Perhaps simplest would have been to play 47. RxB and then after 47...fxR 48. h5 gxh5 [and not Rosenthal's awful 48...Ke6?? that loses to 49. hxg6 since after 49...Kf5 White would play 50. g7 rather than Rosenthal's proposed 50. Bd6??] 49.f7 Ke6 50. g6 kf6 51. Bd6 with a draw.

Instead, Rosen decided to sacrifice a pawn to free his Rook with 47. h5. Now, after 47...Bxh5 48. Rh7 Bg6. Rosen was in trouble. He might still have saved the game with 49. Rh1. When he lost a tempo with 49. Rh2, Burn's c-pawn marched to victory.

What an astonishing turn of events! Burn was not 3-0 and tied for first, and Rosen was 0-3 and tied for last.

Chess can be a cruel game.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Paris 1900
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Paris 1900
by suenteus po 147


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC