chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Jaan Ehlvest vs Teimour Radjabov
FIDE World Championship Tournament (2001/02) (blitz), Moscow RUS, rd 1, Nov-27
King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation. Classical Fianchetto (E67)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more Ehlvest/Radjabov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-21-06  acirce: <Extremely Idiotic decision by the Board of Arbiters and the Appeals Committee forces Teimour to walk-out of the FIDE World Championship>

<In the first blitz game, Radjabov outplayed his opponent with Black and was a piece up when he suddenly noticed that the flag on his clock was about to fall. Trying to accumulate some extra time, he made a couple of moves without much thought. In doing so, the winning position was turned into a hopeless one. But this is immaterial because his flag still did fall! It turned out that at the beginning of the game, the arbiter (Ostashevsky, an elderly man from Samara ) forgot to set Radjabov's clock to add the required time increment per move.

Instead of simply ordering a replay of the first tie-break game, the arbiters ridiculously ordered Ehlvest and Radjabov to play the second blitz game, with the result of the first game still not determined. Radjabov refused of course, but later agreed to his disgust due to the insistence of the arbiters. This second blitz game was drawn. Surprisingly, the verdict for the first blitz game still hung in the air for more than an hour when it was so obvious they should just order a replay of the game.

When the verdict finally came, everybody was struck by its imbecility (there's no other word for it, according to KasparovChess correspondent Ilya Gorodetsky)! The players were asked to finish that game from the moment Radjabov ran out of time, and the players would get seven minutes each (this figure appeared as a result of a complicated but idiotic calculation that nobody was able to understand). Naturally Teimour refused to play and his game was adjudicated lost.>

http://www.geocities.com/MIGHTORS6/...

<By the way, I want to point out that the players signed a contract stipulating that two tiebreak games should be played with the time control of 5+10. In my match with Ehlvest only one of two games was played with the required time control. The other game was started (and never finished) with a different time control. In other words, our fifth game was formally not played at all under the regulations of the World Chess Championship, and after five officially played games with an even score I was considered a loser.>

http://www.geocities.com/MIGHTORS6/...

Oct-21-06  aw1988: Lo and behold the marvels of FIDE.
Oct-07-17  machomortensen: Come on, acirce ...

Both players suffered. You wrote: "It turned out that at the beginning of the game, the arbiter (Ostashevsky, an elderly man from Samara ) forgot to set Radjabov's clock to add the required time increment per move."

BOTH players, not only Radjabov.

Every chesschild in the world know that you have to make your protest DURING the game, not AFTER the game.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: BLITZ. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC