chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Kurban Khanov vs Jacob Yuchtman
URS-ch sf (1957), Sverdlovsk URS, rd 16, Dec-??
Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation (A42)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 107 more games of J Yuchtman
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You should register a free account to activate some of Chessgames.com's coolest and most powerful features.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-15-05  fdbcentral: I cant see why move #42 Ng7 was made? I would have moved Nxf4 if i was going to lose it to Bg7.. and then Bg7 didnt take. Why? Can some one explain what i cant see. thanks
Aug-15-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Here is what I think...
The knight is trapped. Everywhere it goes is bad. (if Ng3 pawn takes, if Nxf4, king takes, Nf6 bishop takes).

Exception being Ng7 Because of this...
if 42. ... Nxg7 (now king and bishop are both on g) 43. Rg2+

and king has to move then 44. Rxg7 and gets an even up knight for bishop.

As far as the take, I *think* (following the above scenario.) knight vs rook ending are not to be desired. Having a bishop helps.

Mar-08-08  cn1ght: Actually black has so many pawns that the knight v rook still might be won, but as to the question I agree that the reason for moving it to g7 is because if the bishop takes the rook gets the bishop, after checking the king. this way the rook is stuck in front of the pawns (I'm fairly certain rule of thumb rook is better behind pawns and in this case definately) and the knight it useless way over there for the time being.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collection [what is this?]
The strength of passed pawns.
from Unknowns of tremendous entertainment. by themadhair


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC