chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

There is a clue unsolved right now on the Holiday Contest Clues Page!   [Official Contest Rules]
Please see this announcement for some updates.
(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Sergey Karjakin vs Deep Junior (Computer)
Man vs Machine 120'/40+60' (2004), Bilbao Esp, rd 2, Oct-07
Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B90)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 2,362 more games of Karjakin
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-10-07  cotdt: why hasn't this game gotten more attention? this guy beet deep junior in its favorite positions!
Jul-01-11  jokerman: Nice game, note that f3 gave him an anti positional computer game. 24.Nc4 is a nice move, avoiding an obvious trade on c6. "Rb1 Rb3" "Nb6 Nd5" shows how grand master think (improving piece placement). a3 a move which i realy dont understand, if anyone could explain, please do! I and i reckon many others would like to know
Jul-18-13  Mikhail Tal fan: <jokerman>
a3 was to prevent Nb4, it seems to me, since black's a5 seems to prepare an outpost for the knight on b4 ,protecting it from the Queen . that kind of prophylaxis moves is always good vs computer as well as vs humans, alike
Jul-18-13  DcGentle: A positional masterpiece by Karjakin, excellently demonstrating the power of positional play against a clueless engine. It's not widely known, but although current engines are tactical monsters, they are weak positionally.

Notice how White systematically chokes off any tactical play by the engine, engaging prophylaxis and overprotecting pawns. Especially pawn d5 is always protected even against a possible exchange sac by Black. The engine has no clue about strategical squares or holes of a closed position.

Karjakin of course knows all about it and exerts so much pressure, that Black's pieces are more and more busy with defensive tasks. So in the end a simple threat to take Black's h-pawn is enough to have Black's position collapse.

An engine knowing about positional chess in the way a GM does, would play differently. About ten years on, Houdini would have committed not all mistakes of Deep Junior, but it's doubtful whether it knows enough to win against Karjakin here.

Mar-30-14  peristilo: Engines have become too strong. Today this victory wouldn't be possible.
Apr-03-14  nummerzwei: It was stupid to include 10...BxNd5 in the opening book if the program cannot handle the ensuing closed positions properly. In particular, Black needed to avoid the queenside bind by playing ...a5 at some point, for instance immediately.

I don't mean to take anything away from Karjakin's win, obviously.

May-02-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: A fine performance by Karjakin, particularly since he was only 14 at the time and the lowest rated among the humans, a "mere" 2576 on Oct-2004.

This game was played in the Man vs. Machine World Team Championship in Bilbao 2004, see http://en.chessbase.com/post/bilbao.... The other participants in the "Man" side were Topalov (rated 2747 on Oct 2004) and Ponomariov (rated 2710 on Oct 2004), and the other participants in the "Machine" side were Fritz 8 running on a Centrino 1.7 GHz notebook and Hydra running on a 16-procesor array. Junior was running on a quad-core 2.8 GHz desktop.

Alas, this was the only game won by the humans against the "clueless engines" who finished with an 8.5 3.5 edge against the humans. Fritz and Hydra tied for first with 3.5/4, while Topalov tied with Junior for 3rd/4th place with 1.5/4. Clearly Junior was off-form in this event. :-)

Nov-22-14  yurikvelo: http://pastebin.com/YUfh3CNw
this game analysis
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Sergey Karjakin's Best Games
by KingG
Choking off the tactical engine monster!
from Positional Masterworks by DcGentle
A brilliant victory by young Karjakin
from Man vs. Machine: A chronology by SkySports
Game collection: B90
by woodstriker
A positional masterpiece
from Instructive games by jusmail


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC