Marc Esserman vs Alexander Shabalov (2008)

Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players ·

Kibitzing

Marc Esserman vs Alexander Shabalov
Foxwoods Open (2008), Mashantucket, CT USA, rd 4, Mar-21
Sicilian Defense: Smith-Morra Gambit (B21) · 0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Given 4 times; par: 38 [what's this?]

explore this opening	find similar games	2 more M Esserman/Shabalov games
sac: 21...Rg8	PGN: download \| view \| print	Help: general \| java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Nov-06-12		shakespeare: 16. Nd5 tries to confuse Shabalov, who does not seem to be impressed at all

Feb-09-16		PawnSac: < 12.f4 ? > A strategic mistake giving black a double attack on two weaknesses (Bc4 and pf4) with ..Qc7. Compare the positions before and after the game sequence 12.f4 Qf7 13. Bb3 Nf4 14. Kh1 Ng6 15. Rc1 Qd8 < POSITION 1 > click for larger view < POSITION 2 > click for larger view Now the question is.. What does white gain, and at what cost? (This is the question one must ask before the combo). The black position.. exactly the same. The white position.. a) The Bc4 is now on b3. (still on the a2-g8 diagonal = no strategical change). b) The QR is now on c1 c) The F pawn is missing /the F file is now open.. BUT.. White is minus another pawn. So the question.. Is Ra1-c1 (one tempo) and the open F file worth a pawn? Black assessed it as NO, accepting the offer. Why? First, white's center is greatly weakened. He has a single e pawn against black's 3, thus it will require a piece sac to bust open the center. And without the F pawn white's hold on e5 vanishes. Second, black has tactics to support the pawn capture, so white's "sac" lacks the vigor (tactical compensation) that follows a good gambit. After ..Qc7 white is forced to make two unavoidable defensive moves; Bb3 and Kh1. < 13.Bb3 > 13. Qb3 Nxf4 14. Rac1 is no better since 14. ..Bc5! forces the liquidation of material after which the pawn deficite is more sorely felt. <when down pawns, trade pawns not peices!> < 14.Kh1 > Necessary to avert the exchange of material and potential knight fork (the Nc3 is tied down to the defense of e2). Instead of the blunder 12.f4? the more natural and preparatory < 12.Rc1 is much stronger >. Then if white is determined to move f4 the reply ..Qc7 can't be played. i.e.; 12.Rc1 b6 (or a6) 13.f4 Qc7?? 14.Nd5! click for larger view

Feb-09-16		PawnSac: < shakespeare: 16. Nd5 tries to confuse Shabalov, who does not seem to be impressed at all > As a youth, Shabalov learned under the tutelage of the great M. Tal, and he displays Tal's temperment. Alex is known to invite tactically complex positions and wade through them accurately.

Jul-19-22		PawnSac: by the way folks... Marc Esserman vs D Gukesh Cannes Chess Festival (2017), rd 1, Feb-20 Sicilian Defense: Smith-Morra Gambit. Accepted Paulsen Formation (B21) · 1-0 Note that in this game Marc plays <10.Bb3!>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
Nothing in violation of United States law.
No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
No trolling.
The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.