I think by now everyone , including <Susan freeman> , knows that <the integrity> is an idiot and so are his elite fools like <gezafan> , <keyser soze> , <diceman> .

Well , that statement of <Susan freeman> is not very clear . It needs elaboration , clarity.

1) Muslims represent about 9% of NYC’s population.

NYC has the largest Muslim population of any U.S. city, but Muslims are still a very small , tiny minority compared to other groups.

2) Minnesota has about 114,000 Muslims, roughly 2% of the state’s population.

, Muslims remain a small minority overall

Now , <the integrity> is an idiot and a dishonest person but in my opinion , <Susan freeman> is intelligent and honest, so I want to understand what exactly her point is .

Here is one of the possibilities - Surveys show that 4 in 10 Britons feel Muslim immigrants have a negative impact, and over half think Islam is “not compatible with British values”

That , however , is a debate about integration not demographic dominance or some such .

So , perhaps point of <Susan freeman> is that even 9 percent Muslims in a western city is bad because Muslims can not be integrated with western cities .

Contrast it with what you do <dicemant> - low life idiots like you just hurl insults . That is all you ever do in this forum . You are stupid and incapable of having any substantive conversation . However , that is not the problem . Problem is that you are unaware of your limitations . A person should know his/her limitations. Know your limitations , <diceman> and then try to grow brain . I and other people here can help you with that .

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...

<FOUR in 10 Britons feel Muslim migrants have a negative impact on the UK – and more than half think Islam is not compatible with British values, according to a survey>

https://www.thenational.scot/news/2...

<Half of public think Islam not compatible with British values Recent survey found four in 10 polled think Muslim immigrants have a negative impact on the UK>

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...

I think these articles/surveys are pertinent to whatever point <Susan freeman> is making .

Once again - <the integrity> and his elite fools like <diceman> are stupid , dishonest people , children of lesser god who are incapable of making intelligent , honest posts . Their posts drag down the quality of this forum . I am sure by now <Susan freeman> and almost everyone else can see that

Here is what happened in Minneapolis and why post of <the integrity> is stupid and/or dishonest :

Officials said the woman attempted to run over agents with her vehicle, and the agent fired in self-defense

A local resident reported the woman was turning her car around and trying to leave when she was shot, disputing ICE’s claim

The shooting drew large protests, with Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey calling ICE’s actions “reckless”. DHS labeled the incident as part of a “domestic terrorism” threat

Claim of <the integrity>: “Liberals attacked ICE agents, ICE defended themselves.”

Reality: No credible reports describe the attacker as a “liberal” or politically motivated protester. The victim was a woman in a car; whether she posed a threat is disputed.

Protests: Demonstrations afterward were political, with many criticizing ICE’s presence in Minneapolis, but the shooting itself was not confirmed as a partisan attack.

By now <Susan freeman> must have realized that

1) i focus on facts , stats , data , understanding different points of view

2) <the integrity> , <diceman> , <keyser soze> can not post substantive posts. They post stupid , dishonest posts at their best and gossip , insults at their worst .

Broader Quranic Principles

Freedom of conscience: "There is no compulsion in religion" (Quran 2:256).

Justice and equity: The Quran emphasizes justice (‘adl’) and fairness (‘qist’) as central values.

Peaceful coexistence: Muslims are instructed to live peacefully with those who do not fight them

Claim : Quran says kill all non-believers

False – applies only to hostile treaty-breakers in wartime

Claim : Islam promotes violence against infidels

False – Quran emphasizes justice, mercy, and freedom of belief

Claim : Surah 9:5 is universal

False – it was a specific wartime directive, not a general rule

The Bible does contain a passage in the Old Testament that prescribes death for someone working on the Sabbath.

Specifically, Numbers 15:32–36 describes a man gathering wood on the Sabbath, and God commands Moses that he should be put to death by stoning

Old Testament Law: This command comes from the Mosaic Law given to the Israelites. The Sabbath was considered a sacred covenant sign between God and Israel (Exodus 31:14–15). Breaking it was treated as a serious offense

Exodus 31:14–15: Reinforces this law: “Anyone who desecrates it must be put to death; those who do any work on that day must be cut off from their people.”

In Christianity, the New Testament shifts the focus. Jesus emphasizes that “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath” (Mark 2:27).

Early Christians did not enforce the death penalty for Sabbath-breaking. Instead, the emphasis moved toward spiritual rest and freedom in Christ.

Most Christian traditions today interpret Sabbath laws as symbolic or spiritual, not legal punishments

The Old Testament law prescribed death for working on the Sabbath.

Context matters: It applied specifically to ancient Israel under Mosaic Law.

1) <keypusher> and <augalv> are right wingers .

<stone free or die> is not a right winger - he is either a left-wing winger or independent .

2) presently , <keypusher> and <stone free or die> have a disagreement and they , apparently , trying to sort that out in an objective , honest manner - trying to know objective truth .

3) <augalv> and <keypusher> are right wingers . They both seem to think something like the following about <the integrity> :

<the integrity> is immoral , dishonest , and also unscrupulous , shameless liar. <the integrity > celebrates cruelty , rape and such . <the integrity > is a hateful , bigot . <the integrity> has no interest in objective truth.

And there is overwhelming evidence to substantiate all this about <the integrity> , i think .

4) <fsr> , <stone free or die> and others think that <susan freeman> has a high opinion of <the integrity> .

However , there is overwhelming evidence that <<the integrity> is immoral , dishonest . <the integrity> is unscrupulous , shameless liar. <the integrity > celebrates cruelty , rape and such . <the integrity > is a hateful , bigot . <the integrity> has no interest in objective truth>

Who wants a separate forum ?

You and your love interests - <the integrity> , <keyser soze> and other elite fools - are humiliating yourselves regularly .

So , you guys have to decide - on one hand you low live idiots crave the fun that abusive , dishonest trolling give you low life idiots and on the other hand the humiliation that you low life idiots incur on yourselves in the process stings you as is evidenced by your stupid , repetitive posts addressed to me . If you low life idiots think that fun you get through your abusive , dishonest , stupid trolling is worth the humiliation that you incur on yourselves then you do not need another forum . But if you low life idiots have the slightest self respect then the humiliation that you incur on yourselves must sting you severely and you must request <susan freeman> for a separate forum where you can wallow and root in your feces freely.

Either way , it is between you low life idiots and <susan freeman> - i am not concerned , I do not care whether <susan freeman> gives you low life idiots a separate forum where you can wallow and root freely in your own feces .

All the best .

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZA_Tl...

<Pulp Fiction - Pigs are filthy animals>

#2 WE've been over this topic too much.. NO censorship, which is what you want. Please give it a break. Surely you can find something else to post which could be more meaningful.>

Hahaha 😆

Jesus ! I do not want you to make a separate forum for these fools and I have repeatedly said that at least hundreds times , I think

I have been repeatedly saying that I do not want a separate forum for these people and <Susan freeman> is like <NO CENSORSHIP , NO CENSORSHIP >

Hahaha 😆

It is like I am talking calculus , algebra and such and <Susan freeman> is saying <NO , SUGAR IS SWEET ...SUGAR IS SWEET ...SUGAR IS SWEET> .

Hahaha 😆

Yes , sugar is sweet , i never said anything to the contrary but what has that got to do anything with what I said about maths.

Do you not remember posting this? By making it exclusive it is censorship>

Hahaha 😆

So , nothing happened after this post? After that did I not post at least 100 times that I do not want a separate forum for these fools ?

Did I or did I not ? And why did I say that ? Do you have any understanding whatsoever of what I am saying <Susan freeman> ?

Do you not see that i am having so much fun with these fools ? Do you not see that these fools can not refute anything that I say and I have been humiliating these fools hugely ? I did not want to humiliate these fools , i did not want to waste my time on these fools . But that did not happen , I was 'forced' to waste time on these fools but now that I have already wasted my time on these fools and have dealt with the matter in a way that I did not want - by humiliating and insulting these fools - why would I want a separate forum for these fools now ? These fools are not bothering me - they are no match for me , they are too stupid - i am having too much fun with these idiots . Why would I want a separate forum for these fools now ?

Once again thanks to everyone , especially <Susan freeman> who started this so very important conversation.

Hopefully , <Susan freeman> would start such important conversations in future too .

If <Susan Freeman> starts a conversation, many people may want to join in because discussions initiated by the site’s owner deserve to be taken seriously. Thoughtful and well‑considered input should be provided to enrich the dialogue. It’s similar to when the President of the United States makes a statement, experts from every relevant field feel compelled to contribute their perspectives.

I try to defend police shootings that are justified and condemn police shootings that are not justified. What do you do?>

Well , by now everyone including <Susan freeman> knows , i think , that right winger <keypusher> , left winger <stone free or die> , <fsr> , <johnlspouge> and most others here are principled posters interested in objective truth . They have integrity , sense of justice , honesty , truthfulness and such . In other words , they are true followers of true teachings of jesus even if some of them are atheists or do not consider jesus 'god'/'son of god'/divine

Whereas <gezafan> , <the integrity> , <diceman> , <keyser soze> and other elite fools of <the integrity> are idiots , conspiracy theorists , stupid trolls with agenda who do not have integrity , sense of justice , honesty , truthfulness and such . In other words , these idiots are pseudo christians. These idiots drag down the quality and average iq of this forum

P.s. : <Lloyd gross> , <areknames> - even though you are ardent/firm supporters of <the integrity> , i try my best not to insult you guys because in general you two are civil even though you support abusive fools like <the integrity> , <diceman> , <keyser soze>

If you two do not mess with me , do not waste my time , I will try my best not to insult you .

Liberals, on the other hand, seem to evaluate who's guilty based on their politics or what protected status group they're in.>

I hope <keypusher> explains to this idiot <gezafan> how stupid his post is .

I have already posted that :

by now everyone including <Susan freeman> knows , i think , that right winger <keypusher> , left winger <stone free or die> , <fsr> , <johnlspouge> and most others here are principled posters interested in objective truth . They have integrity , sense of justice , honesty , truthfulness and such . In other words , they are true followers of true teachings of jesus even if some of them are atheists or do not consider jesus 'god'/'son of god'/divine

Whereas <gezafan> , <the integrity> , <diceman> , <keyser soze> and other elite fools of <the integrity> are idiots , conspiracy theorists , stupid trolls with agenda who do not have integrity , sense of justice , honesty , truthfulness and such . In other words , these idiots are pseudo christians. These idiots drag down the quality and average iq of this forum

But that statement is misleading perhaps .

And the Megyn Kelly video? Filled with vitriol and false claims>

<susan freeman> i very much welcome and support that intention of yours and I have something empowering , respectful to say about that - I am very much aligned with your intention .

I see the vitriol, but I do not see the lies. I will look again.>

Hear , hear ! I believe intentions of <susan freeman> are good and we should support and empower this intention.

I had written earlier too that political positions of <susan freeman> might be similar to that of <the integrity> but she is not immoral and dishonest unlike <the integrity> .

Perhaps you have seen very positive exchange between <Susan freeman> and me recently. And now I am going to email <Susan freeman> about shaping chessgames politics page . And i wish that you and <keypusher> participate in that conversation through email because I am not as smart as you and <keypusher> - not yet - and therefore I need help of you two , especially helpful is the fact that you are left winger (or centrist or independent) whereas <keypusher> is right winger .