|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 58 OF 58 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Oct-25-12
 | | Tabanus: <tensor> Thanks! I posted your analysis in the Tree, here: http://www.jepflast.com/chesstree/a... |
 |
Oct-30-12
 | | OhioChessFan: Engine request:
20. Ne3 Rac8 21. gxf5 Bxf5 22. Nxf5 exf5 23. h4
click for larger view |
|
| Oct-30-12 | | Blunderdome:
click for larger viewAnalysis by Fritz 13 (d=27):
1.  (1.33): 4...Qh5 5.Rg3 Kh8 6.Bd2 c5 7.Qd1 Qxd1+ 8.Rxd1 Bxh4 9.Rg6 c4 10.Bc2 Nb8 11.Rdg1 Rc7 12.Rd6 Rd7 13.Rxd7 2.  (2.20): 4...Bxh4 5.Qe2 g6 6.e6 Qe7 7.exd7 Qxd7 8.Qg2 Qf7 9.Qh3 Be7 10.b4 Bd6 11.Ra2 Rce8 12.Rh2 h5 13.Qg3 Rg8 14.Qg5 Rg7 3. (2.32): 4...g6 5.h5 gxh5 6.Bd2 Kh8 7.Rae1 c5 8.Bxb5 Nb8 9.Be3 c4 10.Bf2 Rg8 11.Rxg8+ Rxg8 12.Qe2 Rg4 13.e6 Qg7 |
|
Oct-31-12
| | OhioChessFan: Engine request:
21. Bd2 Bxd3 22. Qxd3+ Qg6 23. Qxg6+ Kxg6 24. Rxg4+ Kf7 25. Rag1 g5 26. fxg5 hxg5
click for larger viewPlease let it run a long time. |
|
Nov-01-12
 | | capafan: <OCF>I will run your line on Stockfish 2.3.1... |
|
Nov-01-12
| | OhioChessFan: LOL, appreciate it. Reviewing my post, it comes off far more whiney than I intended it. |
|
Nov-01-12
| | capafan: Not a problem... :)
click for larger viewPrelim results at 32-ply. Keep in mind that Stockfish inflates evals. Only ran top two as none of the others made sense nor scored well at low ply. 1. 32 [+1.73] <27.Ng2> Rg8 28.Rf1+ Ke8 29.h4 c5 30.Nf4 cxd4 31.cxd4 Nf8 32.hxg5 Rxg5 33.Rxg5 Bxg5 34.Nxd5 exd5 35.Bxg5 Ne6 36.Be3 Rc8 37.Rf6 Ke7 38.Rh6 Rg8 39.Kh2 Rg4 40.Rh7+ Rg7 41.Rxg7+ Nxg7 42.b4 2. 32 [+1.77] <27.Nc2> Rh8 28.Kh2 c5 29.Bxg5 I will let it continue to run unless you advise me otherwise. Note the evaluations are rising. One kingside plan and one queenside plan for the WN. The queenside plan with 27.Nc2 has not been stable and Stockfish has trouble working out a line of any length. |
|
Nov-02-12
| | capafan: <OCF>
Here is your line after 35 ply...little resolution although now Nc2 is scoring slightly higher. 1. 35 [+1.97] 27.Nc2 c5 28.Bxg5 cxd4 29.Bh6 Nxe5 30.Rf4+ Bf6 31.Bxf8 Rxf8 32.cxd4 Ng6 33.Rf2 Ne7 34.Ne3 Ke8 35.Rgf1 Rh8 36.Rxf6 Rxh3+ 37.Kg2 Rxe3 38.Kf2 Re4 39.Re1 Rxe1 40.Kxe1 Kd7 41.Kd2 Nc6 42.Rf7+ Kd6 43.a6 e5 44.dxe5+ 2. 35 [+1.81] 27.Ng2 Rg8 28.Rf1+ Ke8 29.h4 |
|
Nov-02-12
| | capafan: <OCF>
In line 1. below...
27.Nc2 c5 28.Bxg5 cxd4 29.Bh6 Nxe5 30.Rf4+ Bf6 31.Bxf8 Rxf8 32.cxd4 Ng6 33.<Rf3> evaluates to +3.00 and is winning. |
|
Nov-02-12
| | OhioChessFan: Over 3.0 at move 33.....just saying. I think we're fine, but I have never been more majorly annoyed at a vote. |
|
Nov-03-12
| | capafan: <OCF>The current mix of participants has changed...<ajile> and others, I am sure, share your concern. Simply note who, and who is not, posting. :) A win...how satisfying, depends entirely on your perspective. |
|
Nov-03-12
| | OhioChessFan: I have thought about creating a user name Whine And Cheese just to have a place to blow off steam. |
|
Nov-04-12
| | capafan: How about one named Raven Rant? |
|
Nov-12-12
| | OhioChessFan: Request analysis:
24. Rf1 a6 25. Ra2 g6
click for larger view |
|
Nov-12-12
 | | WinKing: <OhioChessFan: Request analysis: 24. Rf1 a6 25. Ra2 g6>
Just finished up a run <OCF>. Preparing a run on the line you have requested now. |
|
Nov-12-12
| | WinKing: Analysis for <OCF>: < 24. Rf1 a6 25. Ra2 g6 >
click for larger viewCritter_1.6a_64bit:
25/82 +2.92 26.Rh2 Qg7 27.Nc2 Qh7 28.f5 h5 29.fxg6 Rxf1+ 30.Qxf1 Qxg6
31.gxh5 Qh7 32.Qh3 Qf7 33.Rg2+ Kh8 34.Bh6 Bc7 35.Rg6 Rag8 25/82 +2.30 26.Rg2 Qg7 27.Rh2 Ra7 28.Nc2 Qh7 29.Qh3 Rc7 30.f5 exf5
31.gxf5 Rxf5 32.Rxf5 gxf5 33.Bxh6 Nf8 34.Qh5 Rf7 35.Qf3 Ne6 I'm not real satisfied with this run by Critter <OCF>. Some of the moves here seem questionable to me. Going to run the same line with Houdini & see what shakes. |
|
Nov-13-12
 | | Kinghunt: Request analysis:
24. Rf1 Qe8 25. Ra2 Rc8 26. g5
click for larger view |
|
Nov-13-12
| | WinKing: Analysis for <OCF>: < 24. Rf1 a6 25. Ra2 g6 >
click for larger view Houdini_15a_x64:
26/81 +3.16 26.Rh2 Qg7 27.Nc2 g5 28.f5 Bc7 29.fXe6 Rxf1+ 30.Qxf1 Nxe5
31.dxe5 Bxe5 32.Qf7+ Qxf7 33.exf7+ Kxf7 34.Rxh6 c5 35.bxc5 Bxc3 25/81 +2.51 26.Rg2 Qg7 27.Rh2 Ra7 28.Bd2 Rf7 29.Rg1 Nf8 30.f5 Bg5
31.f6 Qh7 32.Nxd5 Bxd2 33.Ne7+ Rfxe7 34.fxe7 Rxe7 35.Rxd2 g5 36.Qxh7+ Rxh7 25/81 +2.51 26.Rf2 Ra7 27.Rh2 Qg7 28.Bd2 Rf7 29.Rg1 Nf8 30.f5 Bg5
31.f6 Qh7 32.Nxd5 Bxd2 33.Ne7+ Rfxe7 34.fxe7 Rxe7 35.Rxd2 g5 36.Qxh7+ Rxh7 25/81 +2.51 26.Rc2 Qg7 27.Rh2 Ra7 28.Bd2 Rf7 29.Rg1 Nf8 30.f5 Bg5
31.f6 Qh7 32.Nxd5 Bxd2 33.Ne7+ Rfxe7 34.fxe7 Rxe7 35.Rxd2 g5 36.Qxh7+ Rxh7 Note that 26.Rg2, 26.Rf2 & 26.Rc2 all transpose here. See also earlier analysis <OCF> by Critter - same line. |
|
Nov-13-12
| | WinKing: Analysis for <Kinghunt>: < 24.Rf1 Qe8 25.Ra2 Rc8 26.g5 >
click for larger view Houdini_15a_x64:
24/84 +2.11 26...h5 27.f5 g6 28.f6 Kf7 29.Re2 Rg8 30.Kg1 Rc7
31.Rf2 Rh8 32.Nc2 Rh7 33.Na1 Nf8
24/84 +3.45 26...c5 27.gxh6 c4 28.Qb1 g6 29.h7+ Kh8 30.Rg1 Rf5
31.Nxf5 exf5 32.Rh2 Qe6 33.Rh6 Nf8
24/84 +3.68 26...Kh8 27.gxh6 g5 28.f5 Rc7 29.Rh2 a6 30.Kg2 Rf7
31.Rh3 Nf8 32.f6 Nh7 33.Rg3 Rf8 |
|
Nov-13-12
| | OhioChessFan: <26/81 +3.16 26.Rh2 Qg7 27.Nc2 g5 28.f5 Bc7 29.fXe6 Rxf1+ 30.Qxf1 Nxe5 31.dxe5 Bxe5 32.Qf7+ Qxf7 33.exf7+ Kxf7 34.Rxh6 c5 35.bxc5 Bxc3> Hmmmmmm. I didn't expect that at all. Absolutely no way I'd expect 27...g5 Either I greatly overestimated Black's capacity to create a fortress or g6 is just plainly a horrible move. Assuming the engines are right, a really good assumption, that tells me all g6 does is change the lever from g5 to f5. |
|
Dec-11-12
| | WinKing: Just wanted to stop by & say hi <capa>(WinKing waves). Haven't hear from you in awhile. We are inching our way toward the goal line in this game. Just want to make sure you will be there when we score! :) |
|
Dec-19-12
 | | ge1144: why not 34.Nxh6? |
|
Dec-24-12
| | WinKing: Merry Christmas <capafan> to you and yours! :) |
|
Dec-24-12
 | | benjinathan: Merry Christmas <c>! |
|
| Jan-01-13 | | cormier: Happy New Year ... tks G |
|
|
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 58 OF 58 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
