temp pawn sacrifice not a gambit
Benjamin vs B G Smith, 2006  (B23) Sicilian, Closed, 31 moves, 1-0
Now this is a true gambit idea -pg 9
Korchnoi vs Z Mestrovic, 1969  (D20) Queen's Gambit Accepted, 14 moves, 1-0
And the Budapest Gambit is a real gambit
Marshall vs A Kevitz, 1929  (A52) Budapest Gambit, 47 moves, 0-1
This line goes deep into opening theory
Khalifman vs Ivanchuk, 1994  (A34) English, Symmetrical, 35 moves, 1-0
Counting the tempos Chapter 1 the first 17 moves
Timman vs Nunn, 1983  (C89) Ruy Lopez, Marshall, 28 moves, 0-1
C1 1.1 exercise
D Griffith vs K Hopps, 1982  (B96) Sicilian, Najdorf, 20 moves, 1-0
c2 How much is a pawn worth page 17- development
A Nikitin vs Furman, 1959 (B32) Sicilian, 40 moves, 0-1
C2- with a number of exercises pg 19-22
Speelman vs G Burgess, 1989 (B05) Alekhine's Defense, Modern, 53 moves, 1-0
Chapter -Mid
Miles vs P Thipsay, 1984  (E88) King's Indian, Samisch, Orthodox, 7.d5 c6, 37 moves, 0-1
The first ten moves makes this real gambit play
J Gralka vs P Murdzia, 1996 (A52) Budapest Gambit, 32 moves, 0-1
c2- development pg 29
Salov vs J de la Villa Garcia, 1987  (A46) Queen's Pawn Game, 26 moves, 1-0
c3-pressure pg 32
Kasparov vs A Beliavsky, 1991  (A19) English, Mikenas-Carls, Sicilian Variation, 34 moves, 1-0
C3 pg 34
Boleslavsky vs A Budo, 1939 (E11) Bogo-Indian Defense, 29 moves, 1-0
C3- pg35
P K Wells vs Shabalov, 1994  (D44) Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav, 36 moves, 1-0
c4 -Centralization 37
J Piket vs J Klinger, 1987  (D31) Queen's Gambit Declined, 39 moves, 1-0
15 games |