chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Louis Charles Mahe de La Bourdonnais vs Alexander McDonnell
La Bourdonnais - McDonnell 3rd Casual Match (1834), 07, rd 41
Queen's Gambit Accepted: Old Variation (D20)  ·  1-0

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
1
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
White to move.
ANALYSIS [x]
Notes by Stockfish 9 v010218 (minimum 6s/ply)7.Qe2+ was played in C Marcelin vs Li Shilong, 2006 (1-0)8...h6 was played in I Valles Moreno vs B Lalic, 2001 (0-1)better is 9...Nbd7 10.Qb3 Re7 11.O-O h6 12.Ne5 Nxe5 13.dxe5 Bxe5 = -0.08 (22 ply)better is 10.O-O Bxe3 11.fxe3 Be6 12.Bxe6 Rxe6 13.Qd3 Nbd7 14.Rae1 ⩲ +0.63 (22 ply)better is 10...Be6 11.Bxe6 Rxe6 12.O-O Bd6 13.Rae1 Nbd7 14.a3 Re8 = 0.00 (21 ply) ⩲ +0.57 (27 ply) 14...Nc6 15.Bxf7+ Kf8 16.Nd5 Nxe5 17.dxe5 Rxe5 18.Nxc7 = +0.41 (24 ply) ⩲ +1.39 (27 ply) 16...Rxc3 17.bxc3 Ne4+ 18.Ke3 Nxc3 19.Kd3 Na4 20.a3 c5 ⩲ +1.27 (26 ply) ± +2.17 (26 ply) 17...Nd5 18.Nxd5 exd5 19.Rad1 c6 20.e6 Na6 21.Kg1 Nc5 ± +2.10 (24 ply)better is 18.Rad1 a5 19.Kg3 h6 20.Rf2 a4 21.Rfd2 Nxe5 22.Rd8+ Kh7 +- +2.92 (24 ply) ± +1.82 (25 ply) 20...Nd7 21.Rxe6 Nf6 22.Re7 Nd5 23.Re5 Nf6 24.Rfe1 Rd8 ± +1.65 (23 ply)+- +2.72 (24 ply) 24...h5 25.Rf5 Rd8 26.Nc4 Rd3 27.Rxd3 Nxd3 28.Rxh5 Ne7 +- +2.51 (24 ply)+- +3.70 (24 ply)30...Rxh5 31.Rfxf8+ Kh7 32.Rh8+ Kg6 33.Re6+ Kf7 34.Rxc6 +- +7.00 (26 ply)1-0

rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
FEN COPIED

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [35434 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 84 more La Bourdonnais/McDonnell games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Games that have been used in game collections will have a section at the bottom which shows collections which include it. For more information, see "What are Game Collections?" on our Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-08-04  Knight13: 14... Rg3 was better. 14... Be6? 15. Bxe6 fxe6 16 Kf2 is a force for black to exchange with Knight and Bishop. That's bad. 19. Rc1 might be better but if black plays 19... c6, then the move is wasted. 26. Re7! is also good, controlling the c7 square for the knight. But 26... Rd8?! wasn't good to me. 27. Nb7! is over for black, losing material. A note I would say about this game is that La Bourdonnais was a better attacker than MacDonnel was. Mayjor problem was 16. Kf2!, losing a rook for a knight. Good duel!
Oct-09-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: <Knight 13> Your suggestion of <14...Rg3?> loses to 15.Bxf7+ Kf8 16.Nd5 Nc6 17.Nxc6 bxc6 18.Nxf6 gxf6 (18...Kxf7 19.Ne4+) 19.Rxf6

Macdonnell's problems seem to stem from his plan to grab the e pawn rather than develop.

Apr-23-06  Gypsy: <14.Ne5!> wins the game.
Aug-04-11  adbat: On move 11 white could have won the game with bishop and bf4 ,and is not compensation for Black.
Aug-04-11  sneaky pete: White actually played 10.Qd2 .. (correction submitted) so 11.Bxf4 .. was never possible.
Feb-01-12  Knight13: Do they really expect me to believe that Black, a master, actually missed 14. Ne5?
Jun-20-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jimmy720: Instead of 10.Qd2 La Bourdonnais missed 10.O-O! A sample line is 10.O-O Bxe3 11.fxe3 Rxe3 12.Ne5 Be6 13.Bxe6 fxe6 14.Qb3 Qc8 15.Kf2 Rxc3 16.bxc3 and White is dominating.
Jan-12-23  generror: One fascinating thing about the La Bourdonnais - McDonnell matches is how they both treated the Queen's Gambit. It was only played by La Bourdonnais (McDonnell always used <1.e4>), and they both began by playing the Old QGA variation, <2...dxc4 3.e3> up to <6.Nc3>.

Now, in the first 10 games, McDonnell then played <6...Be7>, and went on to lose *every single one* of these games. In this game, he finally switches to <6...Bd6>, and although he loses it, he would win the next two games (#9 and #11 of this match) and draw a third (match 4, game #2).

La Bourdonnais then switched to <3.e4> in the famous 4th game of the 4th match (La Bourdonnais vs McDonnell, 1834, the one with McConnell's positional queen sacrifice), lost again -- not least because of his response <4.d5?> to McDonnell's <3...e5>, which is still named after him --, and then abandoned the Queen's Gambit pretty much entirely. He only played it once more in the 6th match, winning against the McDonnell defense (La Bourdonnais vs McDonnell, 1834), despite using <4.d5?> again.

So one factor in La Bourdonnais' winning these matches may well be that he was much faster to adapt his opening to the opponent -- which makes sense, considering their style of play :)

Jan-12-23  generror: Correction: La Bourdonnais' <3...e5 4.d5?> has nothing to do with his losses because McDonnell played the equally bad <4...f5?> on both occasions.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC