chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Alexander Alekhine vs Ludek Pachman
Prague (1943), Prague CSR, rd 18, Apr-27
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical. Milner-Barry Variation (E33)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [35437 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 2,227 more games of Alekhine
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can step through the moves by clicking the < and > buttons, but it's much easier to simply use the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-15-08  chocobonbon: This srikes me as one of Alekhine's best games. It has a look of classic clarity, "like limpid water - with a dash of poison." He seems to play much in Pachman's style here & seems oftentimes to have done that with his opponents but almost always with the Alekhine stinger at the end.
May-03-09  computer chess guy: 22. .. ♘e4 looks like a reasonable move, but 23. g4! initiates complications favorable to White. Better was 22. .. ♘e5.
May-03-09  Calli: Why not 20...Qxe3+? If the score is right, it looks like a bluff by AA.
May-08-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <Why not 20...Qxe3+?>

Kotov:
Or <20...Qxe3+ 21.Kg2 Ng7 22.Rfe1 Qg5 23.h4 Qd8 24.Qf2> with the intent to transfer the queen to d4 with dangerous threats on the diagonal a1-h8.

May-08-09  Calli: In that line, Black can put a springer at e5, 24...Nd7-Ne5. White has no f-pawn to remove it. This is much better than what happened in the game.
May-08-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <Calli: In that line, Black can put a springer at e5, 24...Nd7-Ne5 ...>

That is, <20...Qxe3+ 21.Kg2 Ng7 22.Rfe1 Qg5 23.h4 Qd8 24.Qf2> and now <24...Nd7 25.Qd4 Ne5 ...>


click for larger view

Optically, this looks great for Black. But the <Ng7> is out of play and, after a closer inspection, it also proves hard to coordinate the rest of Black pieces. I have looked at

<26.Qf4>

where the thematic defense

<26...Qf6>

does not preserve the extra pawn:

<27.g4 Re7 28.g5 Qf8 29.Bxe4 dxe5 30.Rxe5...> and maybe 30.Rae8 Rde1 ... The material is even, but White position is better. Black is against the ropes.

--

Of course, Pachman does not have to follow the Kotov line. For instance, 20...Qxe3+ 21.Kg2 <Qg5> ... could be tried because of <22.h4? Qxg3+>. But <22.Qf2> looks strong once again and Black coordination problems seem to persist.

My -2c-

May-09-09  Calli: <Gypsy> Appreciate your thoughts. If 26.Qf4 then simply Nxf3 27.Qxf3 Qd7. I just think Black is much better off taking the pawn. After all, he lost in seven moves by not taking the pawn.

It might be that inverting Kotov's moves is better. 20...Qxe3+ 21.Kg2 and now 21...Qg5! immediately gives possibilities of Nf4 and f5 and White has no thought of h4.

May-09-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <Calli> I think so as well. But Pachman was 17 at that time and probably got rattled when he noted that he was spoiling nicely looking position.

The key conceptual error seems to be <18...e4(?)>, opening that long diagonal. Too optimistic.

May-17-20  Russian Patzer: Gypsy, Pachman was almost 19 at that time.
Aug-02-24  andrea volponi: 22...a5!=.con posizione pari

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC