chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Vladimir Kramnik vs Gata Kamsky
Linares (1993), Linares ESP, rd 2, Feb-24
Queen's Gambit Declined: Cambridge Springs Variation (D52)  ·  1-0

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
1
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
White to move.
ANALYSIS [x]
Notes by Stockfish 9 v010218 (minimum 6s/ply)9.dxe5 was played in C Lutz vs M Gurevich, 1993 (1-0)better is 14.Bh4 h6 15.Be2 a5 16.dxe5 Bxe5 17.Nd4 Nb6 18.Nf3 Nbd5 = +0.32 (20 ply) 14...h6 15.Bh4 Nb6 16.Bxf6 Nxc4 17.Nc5 exd4 18.Bxd4 Qe7 = -0.26 (23 ply) ⩲ +1.08 (22 ply) 15...Qa5 16.Bxf6 Nxf6 17.Nxc6 Qc7 18.Nb5 Bh2+ 19.Kh1 ⩲ +0.78 (19 ply) ± +1.80 (20 ply) 17...Nd5 18.Nxd5 cxd5 19.Rxd5 Kh8 20.Bh4 h6 21.Bd3 Qxc2 ⩲ +1.29 (21 ply) ± +2.05 (21 ply) 18...Qa5 19.Qb3 Qb6 20.Bxf7+ Kf8 21.Bh4 Qxb3 22.Bxb3 Nc5 ± +1.56 (21 ply) ± +2.42 (21 ply)better is 20.Bxf7+ Kxf7 21.Qb3+ Be6 22.fxe6+ Rxe6 23.Ne4 a5 24.a4 +- +2.79 (23 ply) ± +1.97 (22 ply) 25...Nd7 26.Ra8 g6 27.Rxa7 Ne5 28.a4 bxa4 29.Nxa4 h5 ± +1.52 (25 ply) ± +2.42 (26 ply)51...g4 52.hxg4 Ne4 53.b6 Ng3+ 54.Kg5 h3 55.b7 Ne4+ +- +132.73 (30 ply)1-0

rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 4 times; par: 104 [what's this?]

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [35437 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 28 more Kramnik/Kamsky games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you do not want to read posts by a certain member, put them on your ignore list.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-12-05  suenteus po 147: 51.Kf5 is a nice kiss-off move. The pawn is untouchable because taking it means Kramnik queens his own pawn. However, any move towards Kramnik's passed pawn means Kamsky's own pawns are finished. Admirable play, though, from Kamsky, trying to make the connected pawns on both sides of the board work with his knights versus Kramnik's rook+knight.
Jan-28-09  jrofrano: I don't understand why Kamsky plays these seemingly dubious moves like 8. ... e5?!. If somebody strong could explain to me why e5 is a relevant continuation that would be great. I actually played the white side of this exact line with e5 except in the game i played it continued Bxf6 gxf6 which rather ruined blacks pawn structure and ultimately gave me an edge.
Apr-17-10  The Rocket: e5 is played to open up to position making black one step closer to equalizing by freeing his lightsquared bishop on c8 which is otherwise weak in this opening. Its a good move actually.

If not e5 the other plan is to play b6, c5 and fianchetto the bishop but it takes a long time which white can use to his advantage.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC