chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Alexander Alekhine vs Ecole Polytechnique Paris
Alekhine Blindfold Simul 28b (1925) (blindfold), Paris FRA, Feb-01
Colle System (D05)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 2,229 more games of Alekhine
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you find a mistake in the database, use the correction form. There is a link at the bottom that reads "Spot an error? Please suggest your correction..." Avoid posting corrections in the kibitzing area.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Nov-26-02
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: How drunk was Alekhine when THIS happened?
Nov-26-02  drukenknight: gee whiz Nf5 makes more sense.
Dec-19-02  GregorMendel: Qxd5 is the worst move I've ever seen a World Champion play...
Dec-19-02  Kulla Tierchen: According to Kotov, during his 1935 match with Euwe, Alekhine was so drunk he castled into checkmate! Perhaps that is the worst move ever made (or attempted) by a sitting world champion. The game would have been in the middle of the match most likely. Does anyone know which one? This move has a curious resemblance to the incident a decade later where Alekhine tried to castle with his queen in Alekhine vs P de Unamuno, 1944, however, one must keep in mind that the first came in a world championship match and the latter in a simultaneous display. Perhaps Alekhine should have kept this in mind also, verdad?
Dec-21-02  PVS: I would like to see this game and find out what happened. I assume he had to move his rook or king instead, but then what? Were there more blunders or a miracle save?
Sep-10-03  D.A. KALIM: are you sure that this is the great world champion alexander alekhine?!or donald duck!!!
Sep-10-03  1.e4: More than likely this is from one of his blindfold simultaneous exhibitions. Give the guy a break, he played 30+ boards blindfold. Just take a look at the Amber blindfold/rapid tourneys to watch top class grandmasters make the same sort of blunders against just 1 opponent.
Sep-10-03  stinkymagoo: wait wait wait.... I think Alekhine could still win here- the Qxd5 thing is an elaborate gambit. Maybe he was setting up something- ideas?
Sep-10-03  John Doe: I think it's too closed to contain any brilliancies.
Dec-14-03  mack: I think that this has to be the ultimate puzzle - white to play and win, 24.?
Feb-10-04  Larson: Here is a possiblity
24. Bf3! Qc5
25. Bxc6 Qxc6
26. Rab1!? Qxc4
27. Bxe5 Nxe5
28. Rb7 Qxc2
28. Rfb1 Nd3
29. Rb8 Rxb8
30. Rxb8+ Bf8
31. Qxf2+ Kh2
32. Qxg2+? Kxg2!
33. Rb7 Ba3
32. Rc7! Bb2?
33. Rc8#!!! 1-0
He was drunk after all...
Feb-11-04  Catfriend: Impressive... And I thought it was a blunder... But now I know it was won for white and AA resigned just because he was drunk!
Feb-11-04  Larson: Oops, I guess there were a few errors in there... just ignore the previous one. 24. Bf3! Qc5
25. Bxc6 Qxc6
26. Rab1!? Qxa4
27. Bxe5 Nxe5
28. Rb7 Qxc2
28. Rfb1 Nd3
29. Rb8 Rxb8
30. Rxb8+ Bf8
31. h4 Qxf2
32. Kh2 Qxg2+?
33. Kxg2! a5
34. Rb7 Ba3
35. Rc7! Bb2??
36. Rc8#!!! 1-0
Feb-11-04  Calchexas: Mmm... yeah, Alekhine has OK chances here, but if White played well also...

Someone should analyze this with a computer, I think. Bf3! is a good next move, but there's gotta be a way for Black to win (or at least draw) after that.

Feb-11-04  Benjamin Lau: I am late to this conversation, so I admit I may be wrong, but what in the world is wrong with 24. Bf3!? Qxc3, trading the queen for a simple and easily winning endgame? I think you guys have overcomplicated things by assuming that black (even though he/she is indeed "NN") would want to keep his queen on the board for no reason. By the way Larson, interesting analysis, but why in God's name would 26. Rc8# get a !!! You should never award a single exclam to a mate.
Feb-12-04  Benjamin Lau: Ooops, I meant 24. Bf3!? Qxf3, not 24. Bf3!? Qxc3, but I think it's obvious what I meant.
Feb-12-04  Larson: It gets !!! because it wins the game. Isn't that the best move you can ever do?
Feb-12-04  Benjamin Lau: I guess you can look at it that way, but in real annotations, ! and !!'s are only awarded to moves that are not obvious.
Feb-12-04  Larson: ! is suppose to be for surprising moves. Sorry about that. I was thinking that checkmate is so good that it should get three.
Feb-12-04  trogdor: What are you talking about. Alekhine has no chances of winning after 23. Qxd5!
Feb-13-04  Catfriend: <trogdor> I"m sorry to announce they weren't serious
Feb-13-04  WMD: This game was played during Alekhine's world record blindfold display in Paris on 1 February 1925; his victorious opponents were a team from the Ecole Polytechnique Paris.

Here's what Skinner & Verhoeven say about the display:

Alekhine ended his self-imposed exile from the chess-playing arena on Sunday, 1 February, when he gave another of his sensational blindfold exhibitions and set up a new world record for simultaneous blindfold display. The display took place in the great hall of the Petit Parisien, and was organised jointly by the newspaper Excelsior and the Federation des Echecs. He was able to improve on the world record established by him in New York last April, when he played 26 games, winning 16, drawing five and losing five. On this occasion he played against 28 opponents and scored 22 wins, three draws and three losses. Opinions differ as to the relative strength of the opposition on the two occasions. Alekhine writing in On the Road to the World Championship was in no doubt that the opposition in New York was stronger, but the report in La Strategie 1925, p24-5, expressed the opposite view, giving as its reason that Alekhine had permitted most of the boards in the Paris exhibition to be taken by teams of players.

The seance was opened at 10.10 am by M. Fernand Gavarry, President of the F.F.E. who introduced Alekhine to the players. Using a system similar to the one he employed in New York, Alekhine announced that he was dividing the players into six groups. On the first seven boards he played 1.e4, on the next six 1.d4 and on the 14th board 1.f4. The same pattern was repeated for the last 14 boards. Play began at 10.18 am.

According to La Strategie, Alekhine was in splendid form and played with impressive speed, disconcerting ease and without any appearance of physical stress. There were many spectators and they religiously observed the need for silence during the lengthy display. Although lunch and dinner were available, all Alekhine would take was some chocolate and mineral water. His mainstay throughout the thirteen hours that the seance lasted was provided by many cups of coffee and 29 cigarettes. The exhibition finished at 11pm with a tremendous ovation from the spectators, and the report in La Strategie said that an old gentleman in the audience remarked that:"Alekhine looked as fresh as a rose."

Feb-13-04  WMD: Here's what Capablanca wrote about Alekhine's exploits in an article (one of a series) he wrote for the New York Times on the occasion of the 1927 New York tournament:

He has what is probably the most marvelous chess memory that ever existed. It is said that he knows by heart every game played played in any tournament by either a first class club player or a master during the last twenty-five or thirty years. He certainly knows by heart all of the games ever played by any of the first-class masters.

In so-called simultaneous blindfold performances Alekhine has no equal among the masters, past or present. Not long ago, in Paris, he played thirty boards simultaneously without sight of men or boards; a truly prodigious feat.

Few masters, now or in the past, have devoted much time or energy to this kind of exhibition work. Some have thought that it would be injurious, which no doubt it would be if carried too far; others, like the writer, have thought that there was not sufficient compensation to justify the enormous amount of labor involved in such exhibitions.

There is a great deal of misunderstanding with regard to blindfold playing. The question is often asked, "How many games blindfolded can you play at once?" "Do you make a practice of it?"

As a matter of fact, almost any first-class master would be able to play six simultaneous blindfold games without preparation. However, to come near Alekhine's figure is quite different, and to imitate him in that respect is quite impossible. It would require his prodigious memory combined with his enormous capacity for mental work in connection with chess.

A player's ability in this respect, however, is no proof whatsoever of his ability to beat all other players. As far as Alekhine is concerned, it is only fair to say that as a blindfold performer he has surpassed by far everybody else and that what he has accomplished in that respect is something of which anyone could be proud.

Feb-13-04  ughaibu: Bearing in mind Alekhine's proficiency at simultaneous blindfold play, can anyone think of a reason, from the game itself, that would explain this particular blunder? When he played Nc6 he must have thought the queen was somewhere other than d6 or I'd expect him to play Nf5, possibly followed by f4. But is there any reason arising from the flow of play that would cause him to mistake the position of the queen?
Feb-13-04  WMD: It should be pointed out that where Capablanca writes that "Not long ago, in Paris, he played thirty boards simultaneously" he is mistakenly referring to the Paris exhibition where ONLY 28 boards were seen. What a poor memory!

Reti in 1928 and Koltanowski in 1931 succeeded in edging up the record to 29 and 30 boards respectively. Alekhine reclaimed the record on July 16 1933 at the World Fair in Chicago when he took on 32 opponents.

In a subsequent interview with Chess Review, Alekhine said, "I found less difficulty in playing 32 games than I had anticipated, considering that it was my first performance on such a scale in six years. But I would have no fear in tackling 35 and possibly up to 40. I can carry that many games in my mind, but every additional game means more time, and the element of fatigue enters. It might be an idea to devote two days to such an exhibition. I would of course agree not to look at a chess board at any time until the performance was over. Under those conditions, I am confident I could carry on 40 games blindfold, and would not set the limit even there."

It would be interesting to test Capa's theory that most if not all leading masters could easily play at least six games blindfolded.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: BLINDFOLD. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC