chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Emanuel Lasker vs Johann Hermann Bauer
"Emanuel Labor" (game of the day Sep-05-2011)
Amsterdam (1889), Amsterdam NED, rd 1, Aug-26
Bird Opening: Dutch Variation (A03)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 260 times; par: 78 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Lasker/J Bauer game
sac: 15.Bxh7+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: All games have a Kibitzer's Corner provided for community discussion. If you have a question or comment about this game, register a free account so you can post there.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 6 OF 7 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-05-11  Xeroxx: Never heard of this game before.
Sep-05-11  aolmail: A very pretty game, although I saw it before in a book. I believe it is the first recorded example of a double bishop sacrifice to open the castled king, making it even more a feat of genius.
Sep-05-11  sfm: I think a Bauer should have fought it out to the end.
Sep-05-11  Schach and Awe: Just wanted to make two observations at the critical point in the game, namely Black's 14th move. NxN seems logical, as it prevents White from opening up black's Kingside after 14. .. Rf8 move ? (or other) 15.NxN BxN 16. BxB gxf6. It's not pretty, however it is not fatal. My second observation is after 15. .. NxN as played in the game, for White to gain any appreciable advantage for the attack, Bxh7+ is mandatory, else QxN is thwarted by f5.

Can anyone recommend a good book they've read on sacrifices ... their calculation is probably the weakest part of my game. ?

Thanks in advance to those who may respond.

Sep-05-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  playground player: <Didn't Dr. Lasker ever learn not to play with his food before he ate it?
Sep-05-11  jheiner: <Yodaman> Thx U R Winning! Super Funny.
Sep-05-11  RandomVisitor: 13...g6 would put a stop to white's excellent kingside adventure.
Sep-05-11  DarthStapler: This has really never been GOTD before?
Sep-06-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Another great Lasker gem.Features the two bishop sac.
Sep-07-11  Shams: <Schach and Awe> Your question about Black's 14th move alternatives is covered nicely a page or two back by <Themofro>, he posting IM Timothy Taylor's annotations to the game, which I reproduce here. The variations are not so hard to see on one's own.


click for larger view

<14.Nh5!><Now Lasker has finally set up the attacking position he's been aiming for, and there is no valid defense, e.g. 14...d4 15. Nxf6+ (15. Bxf6 with the idea of Qg4 also leads to a powerful attack) 15...Bxf6 (15...gxf6 16. Rf3 fxe5 17. Bxh7+ Kh8 [17...Kg7 18. Rg3+ Kf6 19. Qh5 and mates] 18. Rg3 mates or wins the queen) 16. exd4 cxd4 17. Bxf6 gxf6 18. Rf3 and white wins at least a pawn. Also ...14 Ne8 loses to 15. Bxg7! with the idea of Qg4, and the relative best 14...Rf8 (giving the king somewhere to run) allows 15. Nxf6+ Bxf6 16. Bxh7+ (intending to meet 16...Kxh7? with the crushing 17. Qh5+ Kg8 18. Bxf6 gxf6 19. Qh6 and black can only watch in horror as white forces mate with Rf3-g3 etc.*) 16...Kf8 and black can "continue to resist a pawn down" (Kasparov) but that would be a thankless task against a player of Lasker's ability.>

*I love this line.

Oct-01-11  Cemoblanca: 17.Bxg7!

This and 15.Bxh7+!! established Lasker's reputation, much like Carlos Torre's 25.Bf6!! against Lasker at Moscow 1925 and Fischer's 17...Be6!! against Donald Byrne. The 2 bishop-sack has been copied dozens of times and dubbed "Lasker's Combination," (more info >>> http://www.amazon.com/Laskers-Combi...) the title of a 1998 book devoted to it.

But this raises a question that will recur in these pages. Just how original was Lasker? There had been published examples of the 2 bishop-sack before, played in Great Britain in 1867 and 1884. Those combinations were carried out by masters (Cecil de Vere and John Owen) much better known than Lasker was in 1889. Why isn't it "de Vere's Combination"?

One school of thought would argue: What counts is who played an idea for the first time. Lasker doesn't deserve the credit for coming in third.

Another school replies: But Lasker was almost certainly unaware of the British games. (They were little known until mentioned in the British Chess Magazine in 2003.) Therefore Lasker was being original in terms of his own understanding of chess.

Besides, this school would argue, the Bauer game was played in an international tournament, one of the few held in the 1880s. Surely a player who first tests his ideas in major events deserves the credit. That's why openings such as Alekhine's Defense or the Benko Gambit have those names even though others played the moves earlier.

The argument can go back and forth: Is every 10-year-old who discovers the optimal strategy in tic-tac-toe being original simply because they didn't know what every previous 10-year-old had discovered? - From the book "Why Lasker Matters" by Andrew Soltis

Oct-01-11  Cemoblanca: ...and here's something for the laugh muscles:

Scroll ahead to 1914: World Champion Lasker has won the St Petersburg super-tournament. Tarrasch, his bitter rival, finished fourth but consoled himself with a brilliancy prize victory. However, it was only the second brilliancy prize because Tarrasch's winning idea, a 2 bishop-sacrifice, seemed to lack...something.

At the final banquet, Tarrasch looked for an ally to appeal the prize jury's decision. According to Pyotr Romanovsky, who was present, he found himself asking Lasker for support. "Isn't it true, Doctor, that my victory over Nimzovich was a genuine creation of art?" he asked.

"Oh, yes, without a doubt," Lasker replied. "Similar games are only played once in...25 years." :D :D :D

Dec-21-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: White just simplies the win.
Feb-16-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Lasker was probably 20 at the time, so this is impressive, for any age that matter.
Mar-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: There's a little background to this game.

For the previous decade, the biennial German Chess Congress had included an "Hauptturnier" in addition to the master tournament. The winner of the Hauptturnier was recognized as a Master, with the right to play in major international tournaments.

Sometimes the winners went on to great careers (Siegbert Tarrasch, 1883). Others had average to mediocre careers (Curt von Bardeleben, 1881) or ended up not doing much of anything (Max Harmonist, 1885)

This game matched the two most recent winners, Bauer in 1887 and Lasker about a month before Amsterdam. Bauer hadn't played much since his victory, so Amsterdam was the first international test for both.

Would either of the players turn out to be a superstar? The game certainly provided an indication.

And one final point: <It was played in Round 1>. Has there ever been a more spectacular debut in the international arena?

May-19-12  Llawdogg: Wow! Great game. Spectacular debut.
Oct-31-12  Conrad93: I have adopted Lasker's opening system with great success. The problem is that all of my opponents automatically go for attack.
Dec-24-12  zakkzheng: This is a classical 2 bishop sacrifice attack
Jul-05-13  tzar: This game shows the true genius of Lasker.

Not only he conceived the idea of the double bishop sacrifice but must have seen that black, even after sacrificing queen (only move) was left with clear material advantage, so at the same time he had to foresee Qd7 which wins one of the two black bishops, and even after that the final blow of the game is brilliant.

To conceive all this in one game, more than 100 years ago at age of roughly 20 is not human. Not bad for a coffee house player.

Jul-05-13  Nerwal: I don't think Lasker needed to see ♕d7 to play the double bishop sac (I am not saying he didn't foresee it). White would get a winning game by continuing the attack with 22. ♖f1 or, maybe more precisely, 22. ♕h3+ ♔g7 23. ♕g3+ ♔h7 24. ♖f1. With ♕ and 2 ♙ for 2 ♗ and ♖ white isn't even material down anyway.
Jul-05-13  tzar: ...Probably Qd7 is not the only way to win, the king was in the open air crying for help already, but Lasker found the most practical and instructive way to win (probably foreseen before the combination) and finishing with an almost sadistic queen sac...not a good day for Bauer
Oct-03-13  Maladetta: <Schach and Awe> You should check out "The Art of Attack" by Vukovic. Sometimes long-winded, but good discussions on accurate sacs and attacks
Oct-03-13  JimNorCal: A great story reprinted in wikipedia is below. A lot of drama in the Hauptturnier event. "Lasker shot up through the chess rankings in 1889, when he won the Café Kaiserhof's annual Winter tournament 1888/89 and the Hauptturnier A ("second division" tournament) at the sixth DSB Congress (German Chess Federation's congress) held in Breslau. Winning the Hauptturnier earned Lasker the title of "master". The candidates were divided into two groups of ten. The top four in each group competed in a final. Lasker won his section, with 2½ points more than his nearest rival. However, scores were reset to 0 for the final. With two rounds to go, Lasker trailed the leader, Viennese amateur von Feierfeil, by 1½ points. Lasker won both of his final games, while von Feierfeil lost in the penultimate round (being mated in 121 moves after the position was reconstructed incorrectly following an adjournment) and drew in the last round. The two players were now tied. Lasker won a playoff and garnered the master title. This enabled him to play in master-level tournaments and thus launched his chess career."
Nov-03-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: Great game. Thanks to <Perfidious> for alerting me (and others I assume) to this game.
Feb-10-14  jdc2: Kind of amazing how many games involving this particular type of sacrifice there are, for example:

Gelfand vs Kramnik, 1994

and

A Stefanova vs N Kosintseva, 2012

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 7)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 6 OF 7 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
The lord of the kings.
from These were the greatest... by nikolaas
Lasker's Original
from Double Bishop Sacrifices (dedicated to Anatoly K by Miguel Medina
Tactical themes (Bishop)
by lomez
ApeOfGod's favorite games
by ApeOfGod
"Playing With a Full Deck" supplementary game 3
from Best Lessons of a Chess Coach by Chess Classics
Best Kingside Attacks I've ever seen
by trh6upsz
THE GAME THAT NEED TONS OF ANALYSIS !!!
by Jaredfchess
sensational2007's favorite games
by sensational2007
Game 4
from Max Euwe - From Steinitz to Fischer, Part 1 by Okavango
double B sac
from Learn to attack by kroksy
70e_Double Bishop Sacrifices
by whiteshark
jorundte's favorite games
by jorundte
c8
from Tune your chess antenna by takchess
The first known game with Bxh7+ and Bxg7
from All-time chess classics by Southernrun
The most famous two bishop sacrifice in chess history
from -ER Lasker by fredthebear
The Two Bs
from My 50 Years in Chess by Okavango
Emmanuel Lasker - Game 1
from Magnus Trainer's "The World Champions" Games by MaroczyMind
Lasker -q shaker
from ultra chess by rbaglini
Lasker offrar 2 löpare. VInner
from xfer's favorite games 2006 by xfer
Game 158
from The Golden Treasury of Chess Part 1(Games 1-250) by biglo
plus 414 more collections (not shown)

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC