chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Wilhelm Cohn vs Henry Bird
London (1899), London ENG, rd 18, Jun-23
Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian. General (B30)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more W Cohn/Bird game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: As you play through the game, you can get the FEN code for any position by right-clicking on the board and choosing "Copy Position (EPD)". Copy and paste the FEN into a post to display a diagram.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Feb-25-08  Knight13: Position after 20. Nd5 is something I would hate to see as Black, until ...Bxd5!

This = king side eu l'effet inverse.

Et je pense le b2 pion valait défendre.

Feb-08-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: A good game by Bird, who effectively punished Cohn's unsound attack.

Cohn's plan beginning with 10. f5 was questionable at best, but he had nearly even chances until he decided to sacrifice a pawn with 15. Qe3. Bird happily grabbed the pawn with 16...Qxb2, and did not fall into the trap of going after a second pawn with 17...Qxc2 (which would have lost the Queen to 18. Bd1).

After Cohn's 18. h4 and 19. h5, Bird exposed the flaw in his opponent's plan with 19...Qe5 (19...e6 may have been even better).

But Bird erred with 20...Kh8 (he should have played 20...Nc5) and Cohn now had some compensation. But Cohn should surely have tried 23. Nc7. Instead, his 23. Rbd1 allowed Bird to eliminate the hated Knight with 23...BxN. After 24...Ne5, though Cohn had regained the sacrificed pawn, the chances were all Bird's.

Bird should have played 25...hxg6, but after his actual 25...Rf6, Cohn--instead of 26. Rb4, erred with 26. gxh7. This gave Bird the chance he was seeking, and he sprung onto the attack with 26...Raf8.

Cohn was now in serious trouble, and should have sacrificed the exchange immediately with 27. R4d3. Instead, he dithered with 27. Qe2, and was Koed by Bird's powerful 27...Qg3.

Cohn then did sacrifice the exchange with 28. R4d3, but one move to late.

After 28...NxR 29. RxN, Bird could have won neatly and quickly with 29...Rf1+, but his actual 29...Qe5 was more than good enough to secure the win.

The game quickly resolved to an endgame in which Bird was up the exchange for no compensation. Cohn decided to play on, so we have an unusual example of watching a strong player win a totally won ending step by step.

Though the result of the ending was never in doubt, Bird's precise play over the course of the next more than 20 moves is pleasing to watch.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC