chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
David Janowski vs Emanuel Lasker
Lasker - Janowski World Championship Match (1910), Berlin GER, rd 4, Nov-17
Queen Pawn Game: Colle System (D04)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 20 times; par: 40 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 36 more Janowski/Lasker games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Olga is our default viewer, but we offer other choices as well. You can use a different viewer by selecting it from the pulldown menu below and pressing the "Set" button.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-27-05  Caissanist: Many of the games of the Lasker-Janowski world championship match have a kind of hilarious sameness to them:

Lasker plays some outrageous move (21...h5!?) designed to lure Janowski into launching an unsound attack against Lasker's king.

Janowski falls for it.

The attack fails.

Lasker collects the point.

Apr-20-07  Trimagna: DRAW
1. d4 d5
2. Nf3 Nf6
3. e3 e6
4. c4 Be7
5. Nc3 O-O
6. Bd3 dxc4
7. Bxc4 c5
8. O-O a6
9. a4 Nc6
10. b3 cxd4
11. exd4 Nb4
12. Bb2 Nfd5
13. Qfd2 Bd6
14. Ne4 Bf4
15. Qe2 f5
16. Ng3 b6
17. Ba3 Bd6
18. Rfe1 Nf4
19. Qd2 Nbd5
20. Bbxd6 Qbxd6
21. Bbxd5 Nxd5
22. Qg5 Qf4
Sep-06-07  Petrosianic: <Many of the games of the Lasker-Janowski world championship match have a kind of hilarious sameness to them:>

True, but...

<Lasker plays some outrageous move (21...h5!?) designed to lure Janowski into launching an unsound attack against Lasker's king.>

...In this case, I don't think that is the case. I think that Janowski's 21. P-B5 was in fact a blunder, and Lasker's "outrageous" reply was actually the correct way of taking advantage of it.

How is White supposed to reply here? If 22. Qg3, then exf5 and Black's just gotten a pawn for nothing. If 22. Qf3 Nc3!. I bet that Janowski saw the Knight fork, but couldn't find anything better.

Mar-02-08  Knight13: < Queen Pawn Game: Colle System (D04)> This game actually transposed into one of the Queen's Gambit Acceptedlines.

<How is White supposed to reply here? If 22. Qg3, then exf5 and Black's just gotten a pawn for nothing. If 22. Qf3 Nc3!. I bet that Janowski saw the Knight fork, but couldn't find anything better.> I think your 22. Qg3 is better than taking the pawn and gettin' forked.

Sep-21-10  soothsayer8: cool game! Love the Lasker counter-attack.
Jan-29-11  Llawdogg: Janowski would attack, run out of gas, and then lose to Lasker. Lather, rinse, repeat.
Apr-18-14  Karpova: Janowski sealed his 32nd move and the game was adjourned after Dr. Lasker had played <31...Qe7>., but Janowski said that he would probably resign the game immediately and so the next game could begin. Indeed, he abdicated resumption of the game.

Source: Dr. Emanuel Lasker, 'Pester Lloyd', 1910.11.20, p. 10

Jun-07-17  RookFile: After 11....Nb4, 12. Ne5 is an interesting move.

Strangely, 12.....Nc6! is a good reply by black:


click for larger view

Nimzo wouldn't play it this way, but in this specific situation, white's best move may be 13. Nf3, giving black the option of ...Nb4 again if he wants to.

Against other moves:

A) 13. f4? invites 13......Qxd4+

B) 13. Nxc6 bxc6 14. Be3 Bb7 =

C) 13. Be3 Qc7 and white may have nothing better than 14. Nxc6 again, since 14. f4?! invites 14....Rd8 and black might even be slightly better.

This is the type of position where a guy like Reshevsky or Karpov would do well in. You might think after ...Nb4 from black that the knight would automatically go to d5 next move. But those guys would willfully forget the previous history of how the pieces got to where they were and examine each position on its merits. I think either of them might have answered 12. Ne5 with 12....Nc6.

Still white hasn't really lost anything after 12. Ne5 Nc6 13. Nf3 Nb4. Assuing he doesn't want a grandmaster draw, he just has to try something else. The point here is that a cagey white player might play 12. Ne5, hoping to have black burn several minutes off his clock - and then immediately answer 12......Nc6 with 13. Nf3

May-30-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  PawnSac: < Knight13: < Queen Pawn Game: Colle System (D04)> This game actually transposed into one of the Queen's Gambit Accepted lines. >

You are quite correct!

Opening Explorer

after 1. d4 d5 2. c4 dxc4 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. e3 e6 5. Bxc4 c5 6. O-O Nc6 7. Nc3 a6 8. a4 Be7 we reach the following:


click for larger view

Compare with the game after 9...0-0


click for larger view

It is white to move in both positions. In this game the delayed capture until after white has moved his LSB to d3 [ Bd3 dxc4 Bxc4 ], has gained black an extra tempo [already played 0-0].

Jul-24-23  tbontb: It seems 26.Rh3 was the losing error (better Qxf5 but White still has an unenviable position). Although 8.a4 looks weakening, this type of pawn structure was later tested successfully at the highest level (Botvinnik-Petrosian World Championship 1963).

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC