chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Carl Schlechter vs Curt von Bardeleben
12th DSB Congress, Munich (1900), Munich GER, rd 7, Jul-31
Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Move Order (D31)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 5 more Schlechter/von Bardeleben games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-20-03  Lawrence: This result looks strange, but it's true. Von Bardeleben resigned due to illness. (source: Chessbase)
Aug-05-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: Ah, I could not understand what the threat was!
Aug-05-09  vonKrolock: Today the smartest would be to offer a draw
Aug-05-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: I was looking for short games or traps to add to my game collection. I stared at the board for a few minutes, and I finally decided that, while Black might have an inferior position, there is no way he should resign. (Then I read the kibbitz, and went "DING," now I understand.)
Jul-27-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Von Bardeleben played some dreadful games at Munich, so an illness doesn't surprise me.
Nov-24-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: As user Lawrence pointed out over 15 years ago on this site, Bardeleben resigned because of illness. There was an irony in this result. Back in 1895 at the great Hastings Tournament, Bardeleben, who had toppled the mighty Lasker and drawn with Tarrasch, forfeited his 17th round game against Pillsbury because of illness. This free point allowed Pillsbury to finish one-half point above Tchigorin and a full point above Lasker. Now here at Munich 1900, Bardeleben's resignation because of illness against Schlechter gave him what was essentially a free point that helped him tied for first with Pillsbury. Of course, Pillsbury and Schlechter might have won their games against Bardeleben anyway (and given that Bardeleben was 1-5 going into this encounter while Schlechter was 5-1, the latter was an obvious favorite). But nonetheless there was a bit of "what goes around comes around" for Pillsbury in this quickie resignation by Bardeleben here.

As others here have noted, there was absolutely no reason for Bardeleben to resign on move 9 here. Indeed (and contrary to LIFE Master AJ who suggests that Bardeleben had an inferior position at the time he resigned), if anything Bardeleben had the better chances at the time he threw in the towel.

Incidentally, this was the second game at Munich 1900 in which Bardeleben resigned in a position that was not lost (see his second round game against Showalter).

The game, short as it was, nevertheless had a few interesting points before its premature conclusion:

1. d4 d5
2. c4 e6
3. Nc3 c6

This Slav-like set-up was not in fashion at the time, but was certainly fine.

4. e3 Bd6
5. Bd3 f5

Opting for a Stonewall formation. 5...Nf6 and 5...dxc4 were the alternatives.

The position at this stage was:


click for larger view

There are a gaggle of good options for White here (e.g., 6. Nf3; 6. c5; 6. h3; 6. b3; 6. Bd2, etc.). I would never have predicted Schlechter's actual move, which was hardly in keeping with his usual positional style of play:

6. g4?!

Hard to believe, from Schlechter of all people. Bardeleben's response must also have been a surprise.

6... Nh6

Although Stockfish doesn't like this move and prefers the natural 6...Nf6, I like Nh6 (Fritz thinks it was only marginally inferior to Nf6) since it allows the Knight to recapture on f5. It certainly makes for an unbalanced position, and an exciting struggle must have appeared to be in the offing.

7. gxf5

7. h3 was much better. Schlechter seems to have been out of his element in his 6. g4?! line.

7... 0-0?!

Another exciting choice in this game. But the simple 7...Nxf5 looks best. Perhaps Bardeleben, because of his illness, wanted to create an early crisis to allow a quick finish.

8. Bd2

Hardly best. Schlechter could simply have played 8. fxe6, or perhaps better still have played 8. c5 and then 9. fxe6.

8... Nxf5
9. Qc2

9. Qe2 was better.

The position at this stage was:


click for larger view

With 9...Na6 or 9...dxc4 of even 9...Qh4, Black looks to be for choice. [Fritz rates the game (-0.25) and Stockfish (-0.97).

This obviously is not a resignable position, and Bardeleben must have been sick indeed to have given up at this stage.

Nov-24-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: He was puking 🤢 his guts up, mate.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC