chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Vladimir Kramnik vs Alexey Shirov
Vienna Millenium (1996), Vienna AUT, rd 1, Aug-09
Slav Defense: Chameleon Variation. Advance System (D15)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Never given; click here to play! [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 91 more Kramnik/Shirov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can see a list of all games that they have seen recently at their Game History Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-16-02
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: I don't know what to make of this. First Black plays this 4...a6 move, which seems to me to be a little slow.

Then Black plays ...Ra7, a move that looks as artificial as blue astroturf.

A few moves later, While Black is getting his rook out of the corner, White achieves the d4-e4 pawn duo, which is supposed to be a big strategic coup, no?

And yet, even though you'd think all the cards are in White's favor, after 17 ...e5 White's pawns drop like ripe apples!

And so the question is, of course: Where did White go wrong?

Aug-16-02  pawntificator: I think he should have pushed d5 instead of capturing e5 and attacking the queen.
Aug-16-02  MorphyFan: I think pawntificator might have a point. When white took that pawn at e5 he did open up the middle of the board and leave his poor e pawn isolated. But I think what really killed whites offensive was the time he wasted shifting his queen around the middle of the board. These moves i think showed how white had no real plan, and resorted to aimlessly marching back and forth trying to maintain that e pawn. This allowed black to mobilize his forces and gain a few pawns, and eventually the endgame.
Aug-16-02  pawntificator: Any fan of Morphy's is a friend of mine! Yeah, those idle queen moves certainly didn't help white any. And I hate to call Kramnik a patzer, but was he trying to help black position his knight by playing 24. Qd4+? Why would he put himself on the same rank with the rook when he must have known the knight would be used to block check and attack e4. sheesh
Aug-16-02  refutor: Sneaky...Ra7 does look like a horrible way to cover b7 but if shirov played it, it can't be all bad...let me go refer to fire on board (which i can't sing the praises of enough) In the preface to the game shirov writes "when i learned that i would play kramnik with black, i was not especially confident because the memory of how i lost to him in dortmund, without getting out of the opening, was still very fresh. therefore i chose a setup involving some risk, but in which the chances to safely reacha middlegame fight were still very good...i returned to the chebanenko system, which i played a lot during 1993-94, scoring 3 out of 4". With regards to 6. ... Ra7 shirov states "Against Ivan Sokolov at the Yerevan Olympiad, 1996 i switched to 6. ... Qc8. i am still trying to figure out which of the two moves are better". Does your ...Qc7 that you suggested v. 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.e3 Bf5 4.Qb3 work here? Shirov gave a question mark to 17.O-O-O? recommending 17.e5 as a big improvement and giving an exclamation to his own 17. ...e5! commenting that "now white's centre collapses while the isolated e4-pawn remains as a weakness" if that's enough to cause a lost game, i'll never become a grandmaster. ;)
Mar-17-08  notyetagm: This game is a simply -masterful- demonstration of positional play by Shirov.
Mar-17-08  notyetagm: Game Collection: Coordinated play in middlegame -- Capablanca

Kramnik vs Shirov, 1996

Position after 29 ... ♖d8-d4!


click for larger view

Black has four(!) pieces attacking the isolated White e4-pawn: Black g6-bishop, f6-knight, e5-queen, and d4-rook.

Now -that- is what I call <COORDINATED PLAY>.

Mar-30-08  hexequi: Addressing <Sneaky's> point about Ra7: "Then Black plays ...Ra7, a move that looks as artificial as blue astroturf."

Black gets the better end of the deal. Yes, Black's rook is out of play on a7, but White's Queen on b3 is equally out of play, both being tied to b7.

Maybe Ra7 isn't as artifical as it first seems?

Jun-21-17  Zhbugnoimt: <psentificator> How else was Kram supposed to defend c5? b4? If he played b4? then you could call him a patzer.
Jun-21-17  Zhbugnoimt: The real mistake here was 15.e4? 16.e5 would not have helped due to 16...b6! 17.cxb6 Nxb6 followed by ...Rd7 and d4 falls.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC