Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Jackson Whipps Showalter vs Emanuel Lasker
London (1899), London ENG, rd 8, Jun-09
Queen Pawn Game: Stonewall Attack (D00)  ·  0-1



explore this opening
find similar games 16 more Showalter/Lasker games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Games that have been used in game collections will have a section at the bottom which shows collections which include it. For more information, see "What are Game Collections?" on our Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-24-05  Runemaster: Yet another great endgame from Lasker. The knight on f4 is a giant after move 30. Showalter did his best to generate counterplay, but Lasker's carefully-preserved pawn majority decided things at the end.
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: A beautifully played endgame by Lasker. Pleasing as Lasker's play is in this classic Knight versus Bishop ending, it is spoiled by Showalter's zombie-like play in the ending and the terrible commentary in the Tournament Book.

Showalter tried to attack Lasker in the middle-game by advancing his g pawn, but this got him nowhere, and Lasker got the better game. Instead of trying to convert his middle-game edge, Lasker allowed the game to be reduced to an ending in which his edge was gone. He did this--no doubt--because he was sure he could win any even approximately equal ending against Showalter. As the course of the game demonstrates, Lasker was correct.

According to the Tournament Book, Lasker went into this endgame because his pawn majority on then King's side gave him an advantage. This is nonsense. The diagram below shows the position after 29...KxR:

click for larger view

Does Black (Lasker) have an edge here? Hardly! That Lasker managed to secure resignation from this position in just 17 moves is testament to his incredible endgame skill and Showalter's incredibly weak play from this point on. I would venture to say that had Lasker had the White pieces against Showalter in this position, he would have won equally easily. To put it bluntly, Showalter was no match for Lasker in the endgame.

In the diagrammed position, Showalter could have maintained his tiny edge with 30. Bc2 or 30. Kh2 or just about anything other than his actual move of 30. Kf2. This allowed Lasker to fork Showalter's Bishop and Pawn with 30...Nf4. Compare the position after 30...Nf4 with the position one move earlier and the progress Lasker made is obvious.

click for larger view

Now Showalter had to play 31. Bf1. He was still OK (the Tournament Book's claim that he was lost here is ridiculous) but now Lasker was in his element, and began exploiting his edge on the King's side by advancing his KNP and KRP. After Lasker's 33rd move, the position was this:

click for larger view

As is obvious, Lasker has something going on the King's side, but as is also obvious Showalter had chances to obtain counterplay on the other wing. With something like 34. Bb5, the game would have been even. Instead, Showalter played the lemming-like b3. A look at the position two moves later shows the progress Lasker had made after swapping a pair of pawns on the King's side:

click for larger view

Showalter's position is hardly beyond repair, but now he needed to play with great care. Instead, he created a weakness on the Queen's side with 36. c4, allowing Lasker to make another advantageous swap. After Lasker s 37...Kf5, the situation was becoming critical for Showalter:

click for larger view

The threat of Lasker's running h pawn was bad enough. What Showalter could not afford was to allow Lasker to obtain threats on the other side while his (Showalter's) King was tied down on the opposite wing. He also needed to guard his center pawns. Showalter could have made a game of it in the diagrammed position with 38. c5, tying down Lasker's b pawn. Instead, Showalter played 38. Kg3 and Lasker was off to the races with 38...Ke4:

click for larger view

What followed was carnage!

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game #47
from John Nunn's Chess Course by Incremental
from Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by StoppedClock
The Lion King
by chocobonbon
Stonewall Attack (D00) 0-1 B vs N ending
from EG Pawns EG; the Q might attend FTB's party by fredthebear
Stonewall Attack (D00) 0-1 Drop a pawn, drop the game
from Emanuel Lasker Collection by hrannar
Game 27
from Why Lasker Matters (Soltis) by Qindarka
London 1899
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Game #47
from John Nunn's Chess Course copy by fredthebear
Game #47
from John Nunn's Chess Course by vantheanh
Game #47
from Lasker JNCC by chestofgold
Game #47
from JNCC Games by pqmatagi
London 1899
by suenteus po 147
from Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by Incremental
All Hail Emanuel
by iron maiden
from Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by keypusher

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC