Vladimir Simagin vs Evgeny Terpugov (1951)

Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players ·

Kibitzing

Vladimir Simagin vs Evgeny Terpugov
USSR Championship (1951), Moscow URS, rd 16, Dec-10
Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Move Order (D31) · 1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening	find similar games	2 more Simagin/E Terpugov games
sac: 24.Qxd6	PGN: download \| view \| print	Help: general \| java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Jul-18-22		cehertan: He justifiably resigns a pawn up position because the h pawn is marching to glory.

Jul-18-22		Open Defence: actually in most variations I think it will be the f pawn that queens and wins a rook and bishop in the process

Jul-18-22		cehertan: You do, huh? Explain to me what is wrong with h5, h6, and mate or winning everything in sight? Yes f5 would also win but rather silly to counter my statement unless you can show a line where h5-h6 does not rip blacks lungs out, no?

Jul-18-22		Open Defence: Coz Black would play h6 first 34...h6 35.gxh6 Rf6 36.hxg7+ Kxg7 click for larger view And of course Black is lost which is why he resigned after White's 34th move But as I said it is the f pawn that is now the threat and so 37. f5 with play possibly continuing 37..Bc5 38.Kc2 a5 39.h5 b4 40.Kb3 Kh6 41.Bxf6 Nd5 42.Bg7+ Kxh5 43.f6 Nxe3 44.f7 a4+ 45.Kxa4 Nc2 46.f8=Q So its not the h pawn marching to the end but the k side being opened up.... but if the question is which pawn will end up Queening...it is the f pawn...

Jul-18-22		cehertan: Very nice analysis, except that in your diagram after 37.f5 as I said, black is getting completely eviscerated so your original statement was still absurd. It would be more correct to say that pushing the h or f pawns both compel immediate resignation. Enough said.

Jul-18-22		cehertan: I asked you to show a line where h5-h6 does not rip blacks lungs out, and you categorically failed to do so.

Jul-19-22		Open Defence: < It would be more correct to say that pushing the h or f pawns both compel immediate resignation. Enough said.> that was my point <I asked you to show a line where h5-h6 does not rip blacks lungs out, and you categorically failed to do so.> that was after your original post where you said the h pawn marches to glory <Very nice analysis, except that in your diagram after 37.f5 as I said, black is getting completely eviscerated so your original statement was still absurd> My original statement was that in most lines the f pawn queens as it does in the line I gave so how is that absurd??

Jul-19-22		Open Defence: <It would be more correct to say that pushing the h or f pawns both compel immediate resignation.> it would be more correct to say the h pawn will destroy Blacks k side protection and the f pawn will Queen

Jul-19-22		Muttley101: Cehertan, you asked Open Defence to show you a line where the h-pawn "doesn't march to glory", and he literally does that. You then claim he has "categorically" not given a line where the h-pawn marches to glory, ignoring that it is in his reply to you. First, you might take your tone down a notch. No-one owes you an explanation on the internet, you're not king of the internet and you're not their boss. The user was good enough to show you how black can put up resistance, though still lost, and answered your question. Second, you originally claimed that "... the h pawn is marching to glory" without giving any line showing this, so it's pretty hypocritical to do this and then rail at a user for ... not giving a line (which wasn't even correct). So here's the thing. You claim that in the final position, "the h-pawn is marching to glory". Did you have a line that shows that is forced (if so, please post it), or did you just make an off-the-cuff remark without actually basing it on analysing the position? Lastly, you might want to reflect on how you come across in your comments. I have no idea who you are, but you come across as someone who doesn't read posts and over-reacts if someone disagrees with you, rather than someone is considered and constructive, and you should provide analysis yourself if you're going to (erroneously) criticise others for not doing so.

Jul-19-22		Open Defence: thanks <Muttley101>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
Nothing in violation of United States law.
No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
No trolling.
The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.