chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Vera Menchik vs George Thomas
"How Vera Clever" (game of the day Sep-24-2015)
London (1932), London ENG, rd 4, Feb-04
King's Indian Defense: Saemisch. Orthodox Variation (E85)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 20 times; par: 25 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 16 more Menchik/G Thomas games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-08-02  pawntificator: 18 Nf5!
Nov-23-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: <18 Nf5!> A common and beautiful motif in the Saemisch Attack.
Nov-23-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eggman: <18.Nf5!>

Kmoch's so-called "Benoni Jump".

Sep-18-04  morphy234: nice queen sacrifice!
Dec-18-05  Chopin: She is impressive-♕xh7 leads to a beautiful mate.
Feb-26-06  raydot: It was the Indian that caused the problem, no? Black let the weak dark squares around the g-pawn become fodder for the attack. Astute play by Menchik.
Apr-02-06  Halldor: Beautiful ending by Menchik - White to play and win:


click for larger view

Apr-02-06  Halldor: Not quite as beautiful finish but a bit longer life for Black would be: 23...♖xg6 24.♖xg6 ♖g8 25.♖xg8 ♔xg8 26.♕g7#
Jul-06-07  sanyas: This is what you might call a clockwork attack.
Feb-06-08  Amarande: Actually, Black's mistake, as Hans Kmoch suggested in <Pawn Power in Chess>, seems to have been trading the Knight on move 18. This piece is too important for defense and Black cannot really hold on without it.

Of course if 18 ... Kf6?? 19 g5#. Nor would 18 ... gxf5? do, as there follows 19 gxf5+ Ng6 (or 19 ... Kh8 20 Qh6 Rg8 21 Qf6+ and mate next move) 20 f6+! Kxf6 (else Qh6) 21 Qg5+ Kg7 22 h6+ Kg8 (or Kh8) 23 Qf6 and mates.

But after 18 ... Bxf5! 19 gxf5 Nd7 a continuation of the attack appears to be difficult. White's Bishop is bad, very bad, and is almost impossible to use effectively in the attack, the Knight will be needed on the Q side for defense against Black counteraction, and f6 is too guarded to allow White to secure her Pawn there. White can continue with 20 h6+ and 21 fxg6, with strong attacking chances, but it doesn't look as if she can really penetrate against the defense of the Black Rook and two Knights ...

Mar-14-08  popyseed: may be black could have tried 20...Kxf6
Mar-14-08  Granny O Doul: <popyseed> That leads straight to mate after 21 Qg5+ Kg7 22 h6+ and 23 Qf6.
Oct-27-09  WhiteRook48: If I'm right 24 Rh1 also wins but not as elegantly
Feb-26-10  Eyal: <Amarande: Actually, Black's mistake, as Hans Kmoch suggested in <Pawn Power in Chess>, seems to have been trading the Knight on move 18. This piece is too important for defense and Black cannot really hold on without it [...] But after 18 ... Bxf5! 19 gxf5 Nd7 a continuation of the attack appears to be difficult. White's Bishop is bad, very bad, and is almost impossible to use effectively in the attack, the Knight will be needed on the Q side for defense against Black counteraction, and f6 is too guarded to allow White to secure her Pawn there.>

Is this really what Kmoch says? In fact, Black is completely lost after 18... Bxf5 19.gxf5 Nd7 too (a computer gives something like +2.50-3 for White), one important reason being that with White playing Nb5 Black has no Q-side attack to speak of - in fact, he has problems there as well as on the K-side, e.g. 20.Bh3 (a good way to activate the supposedly "very bad" bishop) Nf6 (or 20...Rad8 21.f4) 21.Nb5 Qb8 22.Qg5 h6 23.Qh4 g5 24.Rxg5+! hxg5 25.Qxg5+ Kh7 26.h6 Rg8 27.Qxf6 Qf8 28.Nxc7 etc.

Aug-25-11  sevenseaman: It ought to be called the 'Vera Menchik' mate, so popular these days.
Jun-04-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: It is hard to imagine how the Kings Indian ever became popular after games like this. Of the 419 games included in the database after 7 Nge2 this is the only one where Black played 7..b6?! No one would make a move like that nowadays.
Sep-24-15  paavoh: Yes <plang>, 7.- b6 is the culprit. Black cannot waste time in that way in an aggressive opening like KID.
Sep-24-15  The Kings Domain: Nice pun. :-)

I've always liked Menchik's games. She showed considerable boldness in her style and her best games are quite entertaining.

Sep-24-15  TheTamale: Wow, while Black is pushing pawns on the queen side, his king side is really weak.
Sep-24-15  kevin86: Rook file mate...queen sac. Must be the theme this week.
Sep-24-15  thegoodanarchist: The concluding combination is Vera famous :)
Sep-24-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: The pun, how vera clever. :)

24.? should be Monday's POTD.

May-19-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  fredthebear:


click for larger view

Lolli's Mate w/a supported Queen

In the game above, the pawn on f6 threatens Lolli's Mate, supporting the queen coming to g7. Due to the Rg8 defending but also restricting the Black King's in the corner, the queen sacrifice 24.Qxh7+ KxQ is necessary to open the h-file for the White rook to deliver checkmate 25.Ra1+ Bh3 26.RxBh3#.


click for larger view

Lolli's Mate on the open h-file

Lolli's Mate is called Mate No. 8 on pages 103-105 of The Art of the Checkmate by Georges Renaud and Viktor Kahn.

There are interesting variations of Lolli's Mate shown as Deadly Checkmate 39, pages 90-91 in How to Beat Your Dad at Chess by Murray Chandler. For example, a White Ng5 presents additional problems to Black. White might also attempt to deflect the Rg8 away to allow the queen advance.

The Art of Attack in Chess by Vladimir Vukovic has an example of Lolli's Mate on the bottom of p.67 under Typical Mates.

Lolli's Mate is named after the 18th Century Italian Giambattista Lolli: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giamb...

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC