chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Poljak vs Khan
Moscow (1928), Moscow URS
Indian Game: Döry Indian (E10)  ·  0-1

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
1
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
White to move.
ANALYSIS [x]
0-1

rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more games of Khan
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: At the top of the page we display the common English name for the opening, followed by the ECO code (e.g. "E10"). The ECO codes are links that take you to opening pages.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-14-03  Whitehat1963: Premature resignation for white, although I have trouble seeing a strong defense to black's immediate advantage.
Mar-25-04  ArturoRivera: All that i can say is that in move four, white could have easily deveoo the other knight and if Bishop to b4, Qd3 mades the trick
Mar-25-04  TrueFiendish: There's not a strong defence, and 6.f3 (the only move) is squashed by ...Qh4+. White was strong enough to know to resign. :-|
Mar-29-04  ArturoRivera: What are you saying?, if this variation were right, all profesionals players would do it, so i can enshure you that a lot of moves can be done against this variation.
Apr-13-04  TrueFiendish: Er, no...in fact, I don't really know what you mean. All I meant was that after move 5 white is lost.
Apr-13-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: <6.f3 (the only move)> Not so, White could also try 6.Qb3, but it's all very hopeless. The resignation here is not early at all, in fact it's perfectly timed.
Apr-13-04  TrueFiendish: I guess, theoretically, white could also go Qc2 or Qa4, so I was wholly wrong!
Apr-15-04  patzer2: <TrueFiendish> You may not be entirely wrong. After 6. Qc2 or 6. Qa4 it seems to me White is probably still lost. For example, play could continue 6. Qc2 BxN 7. NxB Qxf2+ 8. Kd1 Nf6 with a pawn advantage and a clear material and positional advantage for Black. Still, White may be able to find counterplay in the complications after your suggested 6. Qc2 or 6. Qa4 at move six, and <Whitehat1963> has a point in his assertion that resignation is a bit premature.
Apr-15-04  TrueFiendish: How very amenable of you, but I agree with Sneaky. If it were me, I would have resigned in embarrassment.
Apr-15-04  Lawrence: eval -0.66 at 18 ply, hardly something to resign over even if you feel a bit embarrassed about having been so blind as to play 5.a3. <patzer2>, Junior suggests a different order, 6.♕c2 ♕xf2+ 7.♔d1 ♗xd2 8.♘xd2 ♘xd2 9.♕xd2. So alright, chappies, play up, play up, and play the game as good old Sir Henry Newbolt said. (Not a very popular poem after the slaughter of the First World War.)
Jun-22-04  ArturoRivera: Dory´s defense, thats how it is call this move (until move 3) , and i think that it became popular against the torre atack, however 4.- a3 stills give white and edge and he keeps the initiative after taking 4.-... d5 5.- e3, the black knight could have perfectly stayed there a little more, frustration of the player? maybe..., but with my line white should have no problem to ecualize and conserve the initiative
Dec-23-08  Whitehat1963: Wrath of Khan!
Dec-23-08  Xeroxx: There is a famous record by David Bowie called: Hunky Döry

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC