chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Teimour Radjabov vs Leinier Dominguez Perez
FIDE World Championship Knockout Tournament (2004) (blitz), Tripoli LIB, rd 5, Jun-29
Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B96)  ·  1/2-1/2

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
1
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
White to move.
ANALYSIS [x]
1/2-1/2

rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 21 more Radjabov/Dominguez Perez games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-30-04  acirce: <Gypsy><mainly I was curious why Radja rejected 55.Nxe6 Bxe6 56.Kxg4; I was wondering if he too was fishing for something.> Doesn't that just lead to a won game for Black due to his king being so much closer the pawns, White's weaknesses and his worse bishop? It's easy to see that at least one pawn will fall. 56..Kd5 57.c3 Nc5 etc.
Jun-30-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: Sorry <acirce>, I do have to go into my convoluted thoughts from yesterday, otherwise my explanation will make no sense. I thought how to eschew the complexity, but I need it for context.

It was clear yesterday that Dominguez would play the ending for a win; he was a pawn up and the state of the match warranted it. But I was getting a hunch that Radjabov was also trying to confuse the issues; perhaps hoping that Dominguez would go astray. Radja turned down repetition of positions a couple of times and went on several fishing expeditions instead. But that made no chessical sense; there was not a chessical thing White should have been fishing for, besides a draw. Dominguez could have easily afford to loose a pawn, two, perhaps even all three and still hold the position. So the next hypothesis was that Radja was "messing with Dominguez' mind"; that Radja was fishing for something that would unsettle Dominguez. Eventually, this prompted my comment that "... these guys are crazy ..." The analogy I did not find yesterday was that much of that end-game felt like a boxing stear-down: as if it was not about who is a better chess player; but rather about who is the macho supremo. I am not sure how much Dominguez was realy playing that game, but I give it a high probability that Radja was.

You countered that "even though this should be a theoretical draw, Dominguez had the right to press on". (Btw, I have no beef with that.) Since I did not want to go into long explanations of thoughts that were even fuzzier yesterday, I just pointed to the place where I was with my thoughts.

It was the earliest place in the game where something was possibly off kilter--53.Ng5 Nd8 54.Ne4. Why did White play the 53.Ng5 fork? It sure was a pretty move, but Black would not settle for the clear draw after 53...Nxg5, would he? Therefore, 53.Nd8 had to be the game continuation; yet the exchange 55.Nxe6 Bxe6 56.Kxg4 can be rejected on general grounds (knight better over bishop, well you spell that out in your post) or on specific grounds (variations such as 56...Kd5 57.Kf3? Nd4+). So, why did Radja play thus withough some better prep? Was he just pushing piecess or was he already playing mind-games?

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: BLITZ. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC