chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Louis Charles Mahe De La Bourdonnais vs Wellington Pulling
Casual (1834) (unorthodox), France
Center Game: Von der Lasa Gambit (000)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

find similar games 105 more games of La Bourdonnais
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-15-05  Knight13: Very nice play by White, man. Totally. This game is totally White's game. Jump in.... Crash crash... WIN!
Aug-15-05  sharpnova: ya uhm.. 14. h4 was a mistake
16. Qg3 was a big mistake allowing Rxe6 and a win of a piece for nothing.

in the final position black is completely winning.

17. ... Bxf4 18. Qxh5+ Kg8 19. Nc3 Rxe6 20. Qxd5 Qxd5 21. Nxd5 etc.

look. black is a piece up.

so my god <knight13> what in the world are you talking about?

Aug-15-05  Knight13: <sharpnova> I'm not sure about that. Would a totally blunder-killing game be recorded for over 150 years?
Aug-15-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <sharpnova, Knight13> 17. ... Bxf4 18. Qxh5+ Kg8 and now 19. Nc3? is not forced. Simply 19. Qf5 looks like it avoids losing a piece. Black would be a pawn ahead and favored to win, but the game could go on for some time.

Maybe something is wrong with the game record or result?

Aug-16-05  sharpnova: ok i fired up fritz. i'm getting tired of this.

it says black is winning by 3.0 that's the value of a knight or a bishop. it prefers Qf5 like u said but i'm still right. the game is completely over and black won and knight13's first post is still ridiculously wrong..

Aug-16-05  sneaky pete: White gave odds of QKt (Nb1), so in the final position Re1 is protected by Ra1. After 17... Bxf4 18.Qxh5+ Kg8 19.Nxf4 .. is possible, followed by N or Qxd5 with material balance. Still, black should keep an advantage after 17... Rxe6 18.Qxh5+ Kg8 19.Qxd5 Bxf4.

This game stems from the notebooks of George Walker and may have been played in London, 1834. It's hard to imagine black resigned at this point. Apparently La Bourdonnais did win, but the final moves were not recorded.

Feb-22-08  wolfmaster: <sneaky pete> Premature resignation was very uncommon in those days, so Pelling probably played on for a bit and succumbed to La Bourdonnais' superior play.
Jun-24-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Noflaps: Sneaky Pete's astute observation that this game was played at knight odds took me by surprise, but it appears to me to be correct. This game may be found on page 66 of the Oxford Encyclopedia of Chess Games, volume 1 (I know of no second volume). Therefore, shouldn't this game be shown with white's queen's knight missing from the very first move? Or, if the site's technology will not permit that, shouldn't the odds have been noted somewhere in the game score, or perhaps in the first annotation?

The possible need to make such a notation should be kept in mind when transcribing very old games, since playing at odds was once fairly common.

I will suggest to the website's management that an indication of odds play be given here, so perhaps a correction can prevent confusion in the future, and make black's resignation seem slightly less puzzling.

May-20-12  Oliveira: As pointed out by <sneaky pete> below this game was played giving Knight odds for Black.

It's hard to understand why Pelling resigned at this point. Maybe he overlooked his Queen was protected by the Nb8 and was afraid of ♘g5+.

Nov-21-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  Bishoprick: If you go back to the beginning of the game (not where it starts in "Openings"), you will note that the N on b1 is missing. And it is a White win with the simple Qh5, when material equality has been restored, and it can be assumed that with equal material, de LaBourdonnais would win.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: UNORTHODOX. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Center Game: Von der Lasa Gambit (000) 1-0 knight odds
from Variants / Odds Games Impress Fredthebear by fredthebear
Obds (Part 1)
by Penguincw
Game collection: K-c
by classicalwin
T
from a-1749 by wina
Game collection: 6
by gr2ca1
page 66 of the Oxford Encyclopedia of Chess Games, volume 1
from 17 Moves or Less in Fredthebear's Lavatory by fredthebear

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC