chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Henry Seymour Conway vs John M Bruehl
Casual (1788), London
Vienna Game: Stanley Variation (C26)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 2 more H Conway/J Bruehl games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Games that have been used in game collections will have a section at the bottom which shows collections which include it. For more information, see "What are Game Collections?" on our Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-02-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  InspiredByMorphy: 17. ...Bc7 seems to defensive. Perhaps 17. ...Bf4 would have been stronger.
Mar-22-07  Autoreparaturwerkbau: That's a pretty old game to scroll through.
Oct-08-08  just a kid: <IBM>Yes it would.It also prevents exd5.
Apr-03-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  mjmorri: Some pretty tactics from both players, but White's advanced pawns carry the day.
Apr-03-09  Mate Hunter: The number of knight fork treats in this game is quite high (but nothing amazing).
Jan-10-13  Gely of the Horde: 19...Qe7 loses a tempo. Better to play 19...Qd6 immediately and threaten the d pawn and mate. Then 20 Qh3 loses a pawn, and White no longer has the two-pawn steamroller, and after 20 g3 White's king is looking a little more vulnerable and perhaps Black can get his rooks centralized and into the fight.
Jan-10-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <Gely of the Horde> How does 19...Qd6 20. Qh3 lose a pawn? At first glance, White threatens 21. e7+ as well as 21. Qxh6.
Jan-11-13  Gely of the Horde: And after 21 ...Kg7 22 d5 Black is right about where he ended up in the game. 22...g5 23 Qh4 doesn't seem to help. <IBM>'s 17...Bf4 is starting to look better. Is 16... bxh7+ trading a tempo for a pawn a mistake? What about 16...Ng4 instead?
Jan-12-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <Gely of the Horde> Black's position already looks pretty shaky by move 16.

On 16...Ng4, 17. Qf3 attacks the knight while threatening 18. Qf7#.

On 17...Bf4, even simple 18. Qf3 threatening 19. g3, and 17...Bf4 18. Qf3 dxe4 19. Nxe4 Nxe4 20. Qxe4 and Black's e-pawn and king are looking too exposed.

Jan-13-13  Gely of the Horde: Points taken, <beatgiant>. The shaky position at move 16 comes from 15...Nxe3, which addresses the two threats of the N at f4 being attacked by a pawn, and the B at d6 and N at e3 being forked by the pawn move e5. The pawn fork was enabled by 14...Bd6. If Black doesn't try to keep up with White's development it looks like big trouble. So 14...Bg7?
Jan-13-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <Gely of the Horde> I don't have much time to analyze, but I'm guessing 14...Bg7 15. fxe4 leaves White a pawn up and still with strong pressure on the center, e.g. 14...Bg7 15. fxe4 Nxe3 16. Qxe3 0-0 17. exd5 exd5 <18. Nxd5> Nxd5 19. Qe4 and White comes out with a second pawn up. 14...exf3 15. Qxf3 also looks dangerous for Black.

Maybe move 12 is the right time to try your idea: 12...Bg7 13. f3 exf3 14. Qxf3 0-0. Black would still have some weak points, of course.

Jan-14-13  Gely of the Horde: Yes, move 12 looks like a much better place for ...♗g7. 12...♘e7 and 13...♘f5 just loses too much time. The weakness of Black's central pawn structure is demonstrated by the strength of White playing f3, which I actually hadn't realized until going through all of this. That suggests, in hindsight, that Black should have played 12...g4! allowing him to lose to White in some other fashion.
Jul-21-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  naresb: The game is full of tactical motifs.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC