< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 8 OF 9 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Oct-13-06
 | | Mateo: <acirce: Yeah, winning.> Completely deserved and brilliant! |
|
Oct-13-06 | | Stevens: Brilliant game by Kramnik. Can he keep it up? |
|
Oct-13-06 | | Octavia: great! g l for the next 2 games, or is it only 1 if he winns again? |
|
Oct-13-06 | | Luciano Baldauf: Hahahaha....Great Kramnik!!! Just 2 more!! |
|
Oct-13-06 | | azaris: Why does Kramnik always find the most complicated way to win? |
|
Oct-13-06
 | | ketchuplover: Why not play it out??????????????????? |
|
Oct-13-06 | | cjrubiks: Super game by Kramnik. After move 25, I would've happily taken Topa's position, and then it just disintegrated. |
|
Oct-13-06 | | Archives: Surprised Topalov didnt play it out for longer.
GOGOGOGOGO KRAMNIK! |
|
Oct-13-06
 | | Mateo: <Zabooti: Is this still a winnable endgame?> the white king goes to d3, easy win. |
|
Oct-13-06 | | technical draw: <Why does Kramnik always find the most complicated way to win?> I agree. |
|
Oct-13-06 | | amuralid: Where is the dancing rook ? :) |
|
Oct-13-06 | | ACT terrier: Vlad, go you good thing!! (aussies will understand if no one else does!) |
|
Oct-13-06 | | ACT terrier: Vlad, go you good thing!! (aussies will understand if no one else does!) |
|
Oct-13-06
 | | Eggman: <<great! g l for the next 2 games, or is it only 1 if he winns again?>> Not sure what you're asking <Octavia>, but this (for now) is a 4-game match (25 minutes for the game with 10 second increments), and Kramnik leads 1.5-0.5. |
|
Oct-13-06
 | | cu8sfan: Go Kramnik! Show him who's the REAL champion! If Kramnik stays champion the Bulgarian mafia probably will shove his head in a toilet bowl. (-: |
|
Oct-13-06 | | Gritty: <ketchuplover> <Why not play it out???????????????????> It always seems to be the positions they resign in that leave me realising what a Patzer I really am compared to the top players. I'd have fancied my chances of a draw by insufficient material as black in that one. After all, white does have to promote one of his few remaining pawns to win, and nothing looks clear cut. |
|
Oct-13-06 | | technical draw: Pulleeezze, Kramnik win the next one,Pullleeezzee.. |
|
Oct-13-06 | | percyblakeney: Maybe 25. ... Ng6 is what Topalov should have played. |
|
Oct-13-06 | | dehanne: I wonder what Kasparov will have to say about this game... |
|
Oct-13-06 | | technical draw: The dancing rook only dances for legitimate games. |
|
Oct-13-06 | | ahmadov: Great game by Kramnik. Congratulations!!! |
|
Oct-13-06 | | sharfudeen: kramnik is better than topolov in rapid., now he proves that., we will wait just 2 rapid games to wish the world champions |
|
Oct-13-06 | | KnightLunatic: <Stevens: Kramnik has a piece for 2 pawns but i don't think it's enough
it's over, but is it a win?! i can't tell on ICC!?!> Kramnik had 3 Pawns and 2 Pawns less than Topalov. More than enough to have an easy win....! If he had 2 Pawns OR he was 3 Pawns down then he would face problems to win and they will continue.... |
|
Oct-13-06
 | | blazerdoodle: Did Bronstein and Botvinnik bicker like this? Did Tal throw a piss fit like Toppy's camp? Back in the days when gentleman played chess, when men with honor played (uh, I think there was such a time - lost in my cloudy mind). We're so desperate to change the rules to make everything seem more correct, more honest - and it is just not so. Pick the best of so many games. What's wrong with ten or twelve? Draws don't count. And the result of a tie --- the champion keeps the title. Whoa! What a novelty. No silly playoff games. What was wrong with that? Nothing at all. You have to beat the champion, not tie him - if you want the big cookie. Kramnik is still amazing, and to believe I started this match not caring much for him. |
|
Oct-13-06 | | Ulhumbrus: Kramnik won by gaining the bishop pair, this by occupying the outpost d5 with a N, thereby inducing Black to part with the bishop pair. |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 8 OF 9 ·
Later Kibitzing> |