chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
David Janowski vs Jackson Showalter
London (1899), London ENG, rd 22, Jun-28
French Defense: McCutcheon. Lasker Variation (C12)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 44 more Janowski/Showalter games
sac: 42.Rxb7+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-14-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: A cute endgame combo by Janowski ends what had been a tough struggle against Showalter.

Janowski tried an off-beat 8. Be3 in the MacCutheon Variation of the French Defense and got somewhat the better game after Showalter's strange 12...Ncd7 (instead of 12...Qc7) and misguided 15...NxB (instead of the simple 15...0-0).

Janowski--strange to tell--allowed Showalter to solve many of his problems by permitting the exchange of Queens with 17. Qd2 rather than pursuing a middle-game attack with 17. Kf2.

After a few second-best moves by Showalter, Janowski would have had serious winning chances had he played 25. Nb5+, but instead played 25. Na2 (again surprising from the usually hyper-aggressive Janoswki) and settled into an endgame in which he patiently tried to break through Showalter's tenacious blockade.

Janowski's was held back for about 15 or so moves by Showalter's valient defense, but then the latter erred with 41...Ng6? (41...Kc7 would have avoided the fireworks) leaving Janowski to play in the following position:


click for larger view

Janowski's 42. Rxb7+, uncharitably called a "glaring threat" that Showalter "should have seen" by the Tournament Book was nonetheless quite pretty, and was indeed the "winning move" (to quote the Tournament Book once again).

Showalter, who had fought so hard to hold his own until 41...Ng6? then fell apart (in fairness, his game was lost anyway) with 43...Kd8 (instead of 43...Ke8), 45...Rc7 (instead of 45...Kc7), 46...Ke7 (instead of 46...Rg4 or 46...Rc8) and 47...Rh8 (instead of Kc7).

While Janowski's play after 42. Rxb7+ was effective and won quickly, I was surprised that he missed a gorgeous follow-up combo after 47...Rh8:


click for larger view

Janowski here could have played 48. Bxf5!! ending further resistance (48...exB 49. Nxd5+). Janoswki's actual move, 48. Ra8, ended the game soon enough, so nothing lost except a bit more artistry!

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC