chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Geza Maroczy vs Samuel Tinsley
London (1899), London ENG, rd 26, Jul-04
French Defense: Advance Variation. Paulsen Attack (C02)  ·  1-0

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
1
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
White to move.
ANALYSIS [x]
1-0

rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Maroczy/Tinsley game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can display posts in reverse order, by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page and checking the option "Display newest kibitzes on top."

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Apr-22-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: This game does not appear to require much comment. Maroczy played the opening poorly, got a bad game, but Tinsley then sacrificed a Knight for completely insufficient compensation(14...Nxf2), was lost from that point on, and played weakly after his misguided sacrifice thus simplifying Maroczy's task of finishing him off.

But there was one point of interest before Tinsley's 14...Nxf2?

Maroczy tried the Advance Variation (3. e5) against Tinsley's French Defense, got the better game after Tinsley's poor 6...Qc7 (6...fxe5 would have been much better). But Maroczy then misplayed the balance of the opening. His 7. exf6 (instead of the better 7. 0-0) brought Tinsely's Knight to f6, the square the entire line was seemingly designed to prevent. Maroczy followed up this error with the very weak 10. Nbd2 (he should have prevented Tinsely's plans with 10. h3), and then misjudged the position with 13. Qc2 (he was already worse, but 13. Bd2 was best).

At this point, Tinsley could have tried the superficially awful but actually brilliant 13...Qb6!! This move allows 14. Bxh7+, but after 14...Kh8 it is amazing how fast White's game deteriorates. Probably best for White would now have been 15. Be3, but after 15...NxB 16. fxN Rac8 Black has all the play.

Perhaps best of all for White after 13...Qb6!! would have been 14. Ne3, but Black would clearly then have the better game.

Instead of this fascinating move, Tinsley played the craven 13...h6, and then tried to make amends with his unfortunate sacrificial combination beginning with 14...Nxf2.

Tinsley was probably lost once he made his 14th move, but just to be sure he blundered with 18...Bf4 (as the Tournament Book points out, 18...Rf6 was essential), with 21...Qe5 (if he wanted to continue, he had to try 21...Rg8), and then with 22...Qh5 (23...Qd6 was "best" here) and with 27...Rf7 (27...Be8, was all that was left for him).

Maroczy needlessly extended the game with 28. Qg6 (28. Bg6 would have shortened matters), but a series of suicidal moves from Tinsley brought the game to a long-overdue conclusion.

Maroczy played some fine chess at London 1899. This game does not show him at his best, but against the hapless Tinsley perhaps he could sleep-walk his way to victory.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC