chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Ruslan Ponomariov vs Vasyl Ivanchuk
Tal Memorial (2008), Moscow RUS, rd 8, Aug-26
Spanish Game: Closed Variations. Smyslov-Breyer-Zaitsev Hybrid (C93)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 46 more Ponomariov/Ivanchuk games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-26-08  OneArmedScissor: That was one hell of a draw...
Aug-26-08  acirce: 75..f2 was a tablebase draw as well, but Ivanchuk's 75..g3 was easier and more thematic - point being that the knight from f1 would otherwise have reached c7 quicker when White has advanced his pawn to a6. Imagine the position after 87..Ka8 as in the game:


click for larger view

but with this position instead:


click for larger view

(or this:


click for larger view

)

Now Nd5 f1=Q Nc7+ Kb8 a7+ Kc8 a8=Q+ Kd7 Qe8+ Kd6 Qe6# wins. Or with Black's king on b8, a7+ Ka8 Nd5 -> Nc7#.

Aug-26-08  Aspirador: I guess 42...Bf3 43.Nc4 h5 might have been an easier draw option for black.
Aug-26-08  JonathanJ: they could have stopped some moves earlier, but i guess they had a little fun at the end.
Aug-26-08  Aspirador: Ivanchuk originally wanted to play 88...g1N here but then realized in time that this loses to 89.Nd4!

Aug-26-08  PinkPanther: It's garbage like this that makes me believe stalemate should be a win for the side stalemating. I think it's a flaw in the rules of chess.
Aug-26-08  Aspirador: How about if the side giving perpetual wins?
Aug-26-08  parmetd: what a load of crap pinkpanther.
Aug-26-08  micartouse: <PinkPanther: It's garbage like this that makes me believe stalemate should be a win for the side stalemating. I think it's a flaw in the rules of chess.>

I agree with something similar to this: I think the stalemate rule should be eliminated, and a player should be allowed (or forced) to pass.

Some theoretical draws would remain drawn, but the above position would be won for White since he can mate with the knight.

Aug-26-08  parmetd: you're off your rocker.
Aug-26-08  PinkPanther: This game was a draw. Ivanchuk had his ass handed to him all game long. Where is the justice in that? In chess, the most logical and objective of all games (or so people think, at least), there isn't really any room for this kind of nonsense. If your position is so bad THAT YOU CANNOT EVEN MAKE A MOVE, then as far as I am concerned, you lose.
Aug-26-08  whatthefat: <PinkPanther: This game was a draw. Ivanchuk had his ass handed to him all game long. Where is the justice in that?>

He was down a pawn with bishop vs. knight. He just found a colourful way to draw. I don't see the problem.

Aug-26-08  Aspirador: BREAKING NEWS --- BREAKING NEWS

ADJUSTMENT IN THE NEW FIDE RULES

If a player CANNOT EVEN MAKE A MOVE then he is required by the new rules to put a cherry on top of his head and proceed slowly to the bathroom. If a player refuses to do so, then he will be forfeited.

Aug-26-08  PinkPanther: <whatthefat>
He found a way to draw based on a flawed rule in the game. That's what I've been getting at all along.
Aug-27-08  whatthefat: <PinkPanther>

But there were plenty of other ways for him to draw this game. I feel a greater sense of injustice at something like ♔♘♘ vs. ♔, but that's just how chess is. Such material advantages are made purely superficial by the reality of the position. Both sides know the rules, and if you allow the opponent to stalemate - or find a drawn ending like the above example - with a material advantage, then you really only have yourself to blame.

I can understand an argument against stalemate from an aesthetic point of view, but the rule is already totally ingrained, and IMO it produces its own aesthetic beauty in many endgames. Similarly, the concept of zugzwang would be lost if the option to pass was introduced. I personally quite enjoyed playing over this ending; it's impressive to me the way Ivanchuk simplified to a totally drawn position, but not the position you might have expected.

Aug-27-08  parmetd: yes this endgame is beautiful and he wouldn't have drawn it this way were you to absurdly change the rules like that. Ivanchuk never got 'his ass handed' to him here. Such language shows an utter misunderstanding of the intricacies of this game. I must say though that many 2-3 yearolds learning the rule of stalemate often are confused how they have drawn and not won. But I suppose your misunderstanding is a little less forgivable.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC