notyetagm: Aronian vs Kotronias, 2010 <A TALE OF TWO PINS> 49 ?
 click for larger viewA *great* example about the need to be extremely careful when <LINING UP YOUR PIECES>. You can <LINE UP> your pieces, making <ALIGNMENTS>, but you must do so in a manner that your opponent *cannot* exploit. 49 ♘f4-e2 <LINES UP> with the <UNDEFENDED> White d3-queen and wins because Black *cannot* exploit the <ALIGNMENT> White e2-knight + <UNDEFENDED> White d3-queen: the Black a3-queen cannot get to the f1-pinning square. On the other hand 49 ♘f4-d5??=, which Aronian(!) actually played, <LINES UP> with the <UNDEFENDED> White d3-queen in a way that Black can *exploit* to create a <PIN AGAINST UNDEFENDED PIECES> and throws away the win: the Black a3-queen *can* get to the d6-pinning square for 49 ... ♕a3-d6!=. So instead of playing 49 ♘f4-e2 with a winning <PIN> against the <UNDEFENDED> Black a3-queen, Aronian instead played the horrible blunder 49 ♘f4-d5?? and only draws due to the <PIN> against *his* <UNDEFENDED> White d3-queen! An unbelievable blunder by Aronian.
49 ♘f4-d5?? ♕a3-d6!= <pin: d3>
 click for larger view
 click for larger view(VAR)
49 ♘f4-e2 <pin: a3>
 click for larger viewRybka 3 32-bit
6. (1.70): 49.Nf4-e2 Qa3-b2 50.Ne2xc3 Qb2xf2+[] 51.Kh2-h3 Qf2-c5 52.Qd3-d5+ This just shows what a hard game chess really is: a tactical genius like Aronian eschews the straightforward win by 49 ♘f4-e2 for the drawing 49 ♘f4-d5??=. Wow.
But there I go again, getting "too excited about simple tactics". These "simple tactics" would have gotten Aronian an extra 1/2-point in this game! :-) |