Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Andrew Burns vs S Ellis / Sedgefield
Consultation game (1866), Melbourne AUS, rd 1, Nov-01
Scotch Game: Classical Variation (C45)  ·  1-0



explore this opening
find similar games 31 more games of A Burns
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some people don't like to know the result of the game in advance. This can be done by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page, then checking "Don't show game results".

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-26-15  optimal play: <<<<Melbourne Chess Club.>

The first game in the match between Mr. Burns and Messrs. Ellis and Sedgefield in consultation was played on Thursday, the 1st inst., and after five hours' play Mr. Burns succeeded in defeating his formidable opponents. We publish the game.

There was a numerous attendance of members, who seemed to take great interest in the contest. The players will meet every Thursday, at four o'clock, till the conclusion of the match.

We are requested to intimate to chess players visiting Melbourne from the country or the neighbouring colonies, that the committee will be glad if they will visit the club room. Gentlemen wishing to do so are requested to leave their cards for the secretary at the club room, Nissen's Cafe, Bourke-street east.>


Having a bad position, the allies gave up the Bishop with the object of winning two Pawns for it thus being left with three Pawns for the piece. They, however, overlooked White's 21st move.


A fine move. Black cannot avoid the loss of another piece.


And the Allies, after continuing the game for some moves, resigned.>

- The Australasian (Melbourne, Vic.) issue Saturday 10 November 1866 page 12>

The "allies" are probably Louis Ellis & Sedgefield Wyatt Sedgefield

7...Ng6 appears to be an innovation from Ellis & Sedgefield, but not a very good one.

8...Nf4 ? has not been played since, and with good reason.

9.Nb5 ! is a more aggressive move than 9.Kh1

16...Ng5 ? is a mistake; instead 16...Nc5 would have been safe enough.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collection[what is this?]
Pre-Federation Australian Consultation Games
by optimal play

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC