chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Boris Gelfand vs Alexander Grischuk
"Gelfand the White" (game of the day May-29-2011)
World Championship Candidates Final (2011), rd 6, May-25
Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Delayed Exchange Variation (D76)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 16 times; par: 46 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 71 more Gelfand/Grischuk games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Games that have been used in game collections will have a section at the bottom which shows collections which include it. For more information, see "What are Game Collections?" on our Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 15 OF 15 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-29-11  bronkenstein: It seems that black never managed to equalise clearly , ie Gelfand kept the slight edge increasing it to decisive slowly from the beginning of the game (his novelty 13. b3! basically started it).

It is possible that black is lost after 20. . ...Bxh4 ? , though you will not be able to detect it by computers :

<Bronkenstein:...also supported by the story how the computers didn´t understand Gelfand´s strategy in the decisive game , concluded with <In principle, I only made one mistake: Bxh4. But even the computer (which I later looked at the game with) doesn’t immediately grasp that it’s a mistake i.e. the level of play by White was so high that I’d have had to play phenomenally not to lose that game. And it’s never easy to play phenomenally.>>

And of course , @ the time of (unplayed) 32. ... Ba2!? black is long gone , in addition Gelfand had several minutes on his clock while Grischuk was spending his last seconds , even if he managed to play it I don´t believe that it would change anything , especially not in such circumstances.

May-29-11  polarmis: I'm not sure about 34...Bf7, but you can see the winning line against the apparently more logical 34...Be6 (covering the c8-square) at the link I posted to Shipov's video above. The main line is: 34. e5! Be6 35. Qb6 Qxb6 36. Rxb6 Rc8 37. f5! gxf5 38. c7 Kf7 39. Bf3 fxe5 40. Bxe5 Bd7 41. Ra6 Nc4 42. Bd5+ (instead of 37. f5! you'd still have winning chances after just taking on f6, but Shipov says it's not so clear).

p.s. you weren't very impressed by 19. f4, but Grischuk, Gelfand and Shipov all seemed to think it was probably the move of the game!

May-29-11  erimiro1: <Garech> GM Kavalek wrote after 32.-Qc7: "Grischuk misses his best chance: 32...Ba2 33.Rb2 Qc7 34.e5 (34.Rxa2? Qxf4+ 35.Kg1 Rd1+ 36.Bf1 c4 ) although after 34...Be6 35.Qb6 Rc8 36.Qxc7 Rxc7 37.Rb7! white should win"(Kavalek on Huffington); So basicly the game was already lost, although Grischuk "helped" Gelfand to conclude the game earlier. Anyway I must congratulate both players for the game. The attack on h3 came almost out of no where and the defence against it was made by iron nerves.
May-29-11  polarmis: <erimiro1>, Shipov also showed the win Kavalek gives after 35...Rc8 but pointed out 35...Qxb6 was therefore better. The moves after that really do look tricky, so although Grischuk's lost his practical chances would have been significant - at least Shipov said he had a strong suspicion the match would have gone into tie-breaks.
May-29-11  bronkenstein: <Do you know the winning line after 34...Bf7 - I'd be genuinely interested to see it. Thanks!>

For example
35. Qb6 Rc8 < 35...Qxb6 36. Rxb6 fxe5 ( 36...Rc8 37.exf6 exf6 38. Bc3!, important intermediate, removing the pressure from the key c6 pawn) 37. c7 Rc8 38. Rb8 Be6 39. Bd5! > 36. Qxc7 Rxc7
37. Rb8+ Kg7
38. Rb7! Rc8
39. e6! Bg8
40. Rxe7+ Kf8
41. Ra7 Nxc6
42. Bxc6 Rxc6
43. Ra8+ and it´s technical.

(credits to JavaChess )

May-29-11  notyetagm: GM YERMOLINSKY @ ICC -> https://webcast.chessclub.com/icc/i...
May-30-11  hedgeh0g: What's interesting to a 2750+ player is not necessarily interesting to a sub-2200 player. I'm sure the candidates were fascinated by the intricacies of Lasker's defence in the QGD, but the majority of spectators prefer to watch a greater variety of games with sharper positions and no short draws.

To Gelfand's credit, he was one of the few players actively trying to win games and his play was quite original and entertaining.

May-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Garech: Thanks to <bronkenstein> and others for the above insights. I will have to eat humble pie and accept that f4 was a good move; admitting that I am merely an engine analyst!

I think I might have found a draw in your line Bronkenstein, after 39.e6 Nxb7!? For example 40. cxb7 Bxe6! 41.bxc8Q Bxc8:


click for larger view

Well, maybe not a draw, but certainly much better drawing chances than in the very strong continuation you game, which as you said ic a clear technical win.

-Garech

May-30-11  kia0708: analysis of this game is on huffington:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lubom...
May-31-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: White will win this one soon...
May-31-11  bronkenstein: Garech , just a remark regarding the posish from your last diagram.

If black had BSB instead of LSB , he could have a distant dream of exchanging BSBs , leaving the white with ˝wrong˝ bishop and hoping (prolly in vain even so) to reduce the matherial to an elementary drawn ending.

But here , he is deprived even of that last chance.

I agree OFC that it is still far superrior to the simple piece blunder Grish opted for =)

May-31-11  fischer2009: GELFAND uses the line recommended by boris avrukh in his 1.d4 VOL 2 book.I always thought gelfand was honest with the foreword he wrote about the book.CHEERS 4 HIM. And honestly i dont thing GELFAND-ANAND is going to be a great fight unless otherwise gelfand improves rapidly in the next 1 yeara hard thing considering his age and anand comes down from his masterclass.
Jun-01-11  onur87: If everybody play like Kramnik style, Kramnik hasnt special feature. Nobody hasnt special feature. I think now, all supergm noticed that this pragmatic style is very useful. And in this style, every supergm has equal chances. (especially in matchs)
Jun-01-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Garech: <Bronkenstein> Yeah, for sure I agree.

It's still quite difficult to come up with a winning plan for white though, do you see one?

-Garech

Jun-01-11  bronkenstein: For the beginning I would prolly have to choose between Bf3-g4 <idea is to either force LSBs off the board or make black put one more black pawn on white square and remove the pressure from h3 pawn , unless he wants to allow unpleasant Be6 > and simple Bd5 <idea of which is , if black remains passive, and it seems to be his best defense here unless he wants white BSB to start working and speeding up the inevitable, to go Bc4 followed up with Bb2-a3 and eating the c5 pawn...so the pawn will have to go on c4 in close future , and LSB will be tied to it´s defense from a6 > , or some combo of these 2 .

Then ,white king starts marching into the center, while his black colleague should be tied to defending his kingside pawns etc.

The slow grind could last some 30-40 moves , and white can vary his actions depending on black´s choices , I tried to cover one of the ˝passive˝ black scenarios here since , again, I believe that moving any of his Kside pawns increases the strength of white BSB , and bishop pair in general.

Jun-15-11  DrMAL: FIDE needs to use a classical format, short games are inappropriate for determining WC challengers! This game is a prime example why.

Black equalized early, played aggressively with Ra5 and Rh5 and got some advantage after 20.Qf3 (better was 20.Bf3). But 20...Bxh4 shifted the advantage back to white, 20...Nd5 was much better. Now with the bishop gone, 21...Nd5 did not work as well, 21...Nb4 was better. Mistake follows mistake.

22.e4 Nxc3 23.Qxc3 would have given white a clear advantage, but 22.Nxd5 Rhxd5 basically equalized again. More mistake following mistake on both sides.

24.e4 simply drops a pawn on d4. But then black spurned it in favor of 24...Bb3 to drop a bishop for two pawns! What a joke, why not just flip a coin?

Aug-03-11  cludi: I did an analysis of this game on youtube right after the game finished.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=if-o...

Aug-08-11  notyetagm: https://webcast.chessclub.com/icc/i...
Aug-08-11  sevenseaman: This game has two vital aspects of chess in abundance. Gelfand makes good plays as well as continually tempts Grischuk into errors. His last 4 moves are illustrative besides the way he makes the Black R do an unending tango on the 5th rank.
Aug-18-11  leeAniel: Hello, this is my first post! Why did Magnus Carlsen not participate in these series of candidate play? Thanks...
Aug-18-11  twinlark: <leeAniel> From the horse's mouth: http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp...

People were initially very critical of his decision, but by the end of the disastrously dull Candidates tournament (23 draws out of 25 classical games), many forgave him.

Oct-16-11  notyetagm: Gelfand vs Grischuk, 2011

Game Collection: INTERPOSE! INTERPOSE! INTERPOSE! INTERPOSE! 18 Nf3-h4 defends threat to h3-sq from h5-rook by blocking @ h4

Oct-16-11  notyetagm: https://webcast.chessclub.com/icc/i...
Nov-26-11  Nemesistic: 26..Na5? Looks terrible to me,although maybe the wheels came off before that..I have no engine to analyse but surely there was something better
Jan-03-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Nice job by Gelfand to pull a last minute win.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 15)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 15 OF 15 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Match Grischuk!
by amadeus
Match Gelfand!
by amadeus
Game 24
from Together with the Candidates (Kuzmin) by Qindarka
Game 41
from Dynamic Decision Making (Gelfand/Aagaard) by isfsam
18 Nf3-h4 defends threat to h3-sq from h5-rook by blocking @ h4
from INTERPOSE! INTERPOSE! INTERPOSE! INTERPOSE! by trh6upsz
May 29: Gelfand the White
from Game of the Day 2011 by Phony Benoni
152
from Gelfand's Games 4 Study by jakaiden
Lord of the DIRP!
from DIRP! by Phony Benoni
Gelfand x2
by parmetd
Blunderdome's favorite games of 2010-2011
by Blunderdome
World Championship Candidates Final 2011 Rd.6
from Selected Tournaments and Favorite Games (2011) a by partien
Game 41
from Dynamic Decision Making (Gelfand/Aagaard) by Qindarka
18 Nf3-h4 defends threat to h3-sq from h5-rook by blocking @ h4
from INTERPOSE! INTERPOSE! INTERPOSE! INTERPOSE! by notyetagm
7) Hey Hey You You I Could Be Your Gelfand (19 points)
from Best Games of 2011 by tpstar
Lord of the DIRP!
from DIRP! Compiled by Phony Benoni by fredthebear
Game 41
from Dynamic Decision Making (Gelfand/Aagaard) by hakkepof


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC