|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| Feb-09-12 | | Nemesistic: Thank god that text messaging, emailing Goon doesn't have my email address, he'd drive me to even his level of insanity with his constant Goldsbies.. |
|
| Feb-09-12 | | TheFocus: First name Gizmo. Last name Goober. |
|
| Feb-09-12 | | TheFocus: The following, from <AJ>'s profile, always gives me the giggles. <If you have any questions, be sure to e-mail me. ("NO-SPAMlifemasteraj(at)yahoo.com" Don't use the parenthesis or the quotation marks - be sure to remove the "NO-SPAM" from the front of the e-mail.)> Why not just put: If you have any questions, be sure to e-mail me at: lifemasteraj@yahoo.com Is that so incredibly difficult to do? Really, Gizmo, are you that much of a moron? Some people here at <CG> actually know about e-mail. |
|
| Feb-09-12 | | Colonel Mortimer: <LMAJ> <During big events ... like the Anand-Topalov match ... I was literally getting 200-300 emails in a single day> |
|
| Feb-09-12 | | Nemesistic: Im going to have to have a good look through Gizmo's kibitzes/webpage's, and pick out my favourite Goldsbyism.. Something ridiculously OTT and of course full of the traditional BS, mixed in with a mistake in his annotations should be enough.. His award winning/nominated webpage will be hard to beat though.. Vintage Gizmo! |
|
| Feb-09-12 | | tacticalmonster: Why did every time I log on to this site, I always see this <LMAJ> vs " Trolls " warfare? <LMAJ> is obviously insane. I don't see any purpose nor any entertainment value in talking some sense into this clown. Are you guys so low in self-esteem you all find the need to cyber-bully him? Grow up, people! Find something more worthwhile to do instead of cyber-stalking him 24/7. If I am not a chess player and I see this forum, I don't want to be a chess player... |
|
| Feb-09-12 | | Nemesistic: <Tacticalmonster> <LMAJ is obviously insane> indeed he is, indeed he is.. |
|
Feb-10-12
 | | LIFE Master AJ: <ps> I second the thought. If we stick to chess, it will be a better site. (The other stuff is pointless.) I am willing to try ... |
|
| Feb-10-12 | | ernieb: Forgive those who offend you, especially if she has big tatas. |
|
| Feb-10-12 | | Once: Okay, okay. Time to move on. Nothing more to see (or to say) here. <ernieb> Forgive my ignorance, but who has got large potatoes? |
|
| Feb-10-12 | | King Death: < ernieb: Forgive those who offend you, especially if she has big tatas.> Forgiveness comes easy when those come down the pike. Check out this page if you get a minute. Doll |
|
Feb-10-12
| | LIFE Master AJ: I love potatoes ... |
|
Jan-09-20
 | | WTHarvey: A couple sacs in the last half dozen moves:
click for larger view26. ?
and if 28...♕xf8 29.♗xe5+ ♔g8 30.d6+ |
|
| Jun-06-24 | | Allderdice83: A case of the two bishops being more powerful than a queen! |
|
| Jun-06-24 | | King.Arthur.Brazil: I guess this is Monday again... (lgs) 26. Qxc8+ Bxc8 27. Rxc8+ Bf8 28. Rxf8+ Qxf8 29. Bxe5+ Kg8 30. d6+ and 31. d7... |
|
| Jun-06-24 | | King.Arthur.Brazil: Let's complete: 30... Qf7 31. d7 Kf8 32. d8=Q+ Qe8 33. Qf6+ Qf7 34. Qxf7#. Nice! |
|
| Jun-06-24 | | mel gibson: I saw the Queen sac but it still felt risky.
Stockfish 16.1 says:
26. Qxc8+
(26. Qxc8+ (1.Qxc8+ Bxc8 2.Rxc8+ Bf8 3.Rxf8+ Kg7 4.Rc8 Qb6+ 5.Bf2
Qb7 6.Rc4 Qd7 7.Rc6 f4 8.Bd1 h5 9.Bf3 Qb7 10.Kh2 Kf7 11.Bh4 Qb4 12.Rc7+ Kf8
13.Bf2 Ke8 14.Rxa7 Qd6 ) +7.01/44 529)
score for White +7.01 depth 44. |
|
| Jun-06-24 | | parch3: 25...Rc8? looks to be the losing move.
(25...Rf7 )
Leads to 26.Q:c8+ B:c8 27.R:c8+ Bf8 28.R:f8+! Q:f8 29.B:e5 Kg8 30.d6+ |
|
| Jun-06-24 | | parch3: Have overlooked 28...Kg7 29.Re8 / 29.Rc8 |
|
| Jun-06-24 | | Olavi: 25...Rc8 is a worse move than putting a piece en prise - it means that your brain isn't working at all. |
|
| Jun-06-24 | | redcircle: What is it that Thursday and Friday puzzles are easier than Tuesday and Wednesday? Found this one in 2 seconds, whereas yesterday it was a struggle! |
|
Jun-06-24
 | | chrisowen: Very its z q Qxc8+ arrive its oi gg its a cuff muff aha rat Qxc8+ faith |
|
| Jun-06-24 | | parch3: On 28...Kg7 29.Re8 / 29.Rc8
29.Rc8 looks stronger, 29...f4 (29...Qb6+ 30.Bf2) 30.Bf2 Qb4 31.Rc4 Qd2 32.Rc6 Qb4 33.d6 Q:e4
34.Rc7+ Kh6 35.d7 Qd3 36.Ba4 a6 37 Rc1
Δ 38.♖d1 |
|
Jun-06-24
| | chrisowen: Very very glamorous meld ;) |
|
| Jun-06-24 | | TheaN: Freebie Thursday? Sure. <CG>, I'm genuinely wondering what your difficulty evaluator is. Point is the lack of alternatives here! White has absolutely nothing if the queen goes out of the way (Rxc1+ at least =) and other sacs are pointless because of Rxc2 with Rxc1+. <26.Qxc8+ Bxc8 27.Rxc8+ Bf8 28.Rxf8+!> is forced. Now, Black should decline with Kg7 but that's RBB:Q and a rather easy win for White. If instead <28....Qxf8 29.Bxe5+ Kg8> Qg7 prolongs it slightly, but 30.Bxg7+ Kxg7 31.e5 +- is trivial <30.d6+ Qf7> is also forced, and now <31.d7 +-> is significantly superior than Bxf7+: 31....Qxb3 32.d8Q+ Kf7 33.Qd7+, White just ignores the Black queen, 33....Kf8 34.Bd6+ Kg8 35.Qe8+ Kg7 36.Qf8#. |
|
 |
|
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Kibitzing
sac: 26.Qxc8+
