chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Albert Edward Wallace vs Frederick Esling
Wallace - Esling (1895), Melbourne AUS, rd 4, Jun-13
Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation. General (D37)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 18 more A Wallace/F Esling games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To see the raw PGN for this game, click on the PGN: view link above.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-29-16  optimal play: Wallace-Esling 1895 Australian Championship

Game 4, Thursday 13th June to Saturday 15th June

<The 4th game Mr. Wallace opened with 1. Kt to K B 3 (Zukertort's opening), and play proceeded to white's 22nd move.

The game is now of a lively and interesting character, with plenty of scope for combination.

Mr. Wallace has a good attacking position, but the game appears to be about equal at present.

Mr. Esling sealed his 22nd move at 11 o'clock, and play was adjourned.>

<The Age (Melbourne, Vic.) Fri 14 Jun 1895 Page 6>

<The fourth name of the contest between Messrs. Wallace And Esling for the chess championship of Australia was continued on Saturday afternoon, at 2 o'clock, at the Melbourne Chess Club, when Mr. Esling's sealed move proved to be R to K B 3.

On his 26th move Mr. Esling commenced a very powerful attack, which was met with extreme ability by his opponent.

Again and again it appeared to many of the onlookers that the desperate and ingenious assault made by the Victorian player would prevail, and the game has perhaps been the most absorbingly interesting of the series.

Mr. Wallace ultimately got out of his difficulties by a fine exhibition of resourceful defensive chess, and was left with an advantage which before long led to Mr. Esling's resignation at 5 minutes to 5 o'clock.

Mr. Esling, as in other games in the contest, was pressed with the time limit at critical parts of the game, his opponent showing to advantage in this respect.

The match will be resumed at 2 o'clock this afternoon.

Score -- Mr. Wallace, 3 ; Mr. Esling, 0 ; drawn, 1.>

<The Age (Melbourne, Vic.) Mon 17 Jun 1895 Page 5>

Apr-04-16  optimal play: 6...c6 was a novelty.

27...g5? is a faulty plan and too easily refuted as White proceeds to demonstrate.

32.Nfh4 is sufficient, but much better is 32.Nxf4!

39.Nf5!

After four games:-

½ 1 1 1 Wallace (3½/4)

½ 0 0 0 Esling (½/4)

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC