chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
William Lombardy vs Bernard Zuckerman
United States Championship (1978), Pasadena, CA USA, rd 12, Jun-??
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 4 more Lombardy/B Zuckerman games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you missed a Game of the Day, you can review the last year of games at our Game of the Day Archive.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-14-14  Zugzwangovich: This reminds one of Fischer-Spassky #16 in 1972. On move 34 they reach a rook-and-pawn endgame with an extra kingside pawn for one side, then slog on for some 30 moves more before settling on a draw. In the '72 game Evans sarcastically commented, "Finally, after a marathon of nonsense, the sportsmen agree to call it a draw."
Aug-14-14  Gregor Samsa Mendel: Another example of this sort of ending: Smyslov vs Reshevsky, 1948
Aug-14-14  Zugzwangovich: <Gregor Samsa Mendel> Yes, and I see I'd made a similar comment to that game; I'd forgotten.
Sep-20-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  g15713: Diagram 40B on page 69 of Practical Rook Endings by Edmar Mednis

White to play after 60...Kg7


click for larger view

This position after Black’s 60th move 60…Kg7 was analyzed by popular and respected chess writer and American International Grandmaster, Edmar Mednis (1982), Practical Rook Endings, Chess Enterprises, ISBN 0-931462-16-9. Unfortunately, the book is out of print but used copies are still available on the Internet at a reasonable price - Amazon, Bookfinder, etc.

Mednis comments about Lombardy as follows: “Of course, he saw that the thematic approach was to advance further the f-pawn: 61 f5! Kh7 62 f6 Kg8 63 Kf2 Re4 (63… Rh3? loses to 64 Ra8+ Kh7 65 e6!) 64 Kf3 Re1 65 Kf4."

Black to play after 65 Kf4


click for larger view

“However, he also saw that after the temporizing 65…Re2, White can’t win by the direct 66 Ra8+ Kh7 67 Rf8? because of 67… Re4+!! and a perpetual check with the Rook as White cannot capture it with-out allowing immediate stalemate. Thus White decided that the position after White’s 65th move “isn’t a clear win”. Perhaps not, but the winning chances after 66 Ra8+ Kh7 67 Ra7! Kg8 68 Rb7 are fantastic. After, for instance 68…Rh2? 69 Ke4! White’s King is ready to infiltrate via d5, d6, e7 and now 69…Rxh5?! loses to 70 Ra8+ Kh7 71 Rf8! Kg6 72 Rg8+ Kh7 73 Rg7+ followed by 74 Rxf7. My point is not that 61 f5! would have led to a 100% sure win, but quite definitely that it was the only rational direction in which to go.”

Black to play after 68 Rb7


click for larger view

Thanks to FinalGen, a chess endgame tablebase generator for Windows, we now know this is a draw by Black playing any of the following rook moves: 68...Re1, Ra2, Rc2, Rd2 or Rh2 but Black would have had to be prepared to defend carefully like a porcupine. For example, after 68...Rh2 69 Ke4 and now 69 ...Rd2 is the only defense. 70 Rb1 and now 70...Rd8 is again the only defense. 71 Rg1+ and only 71...Kf8 holds. Black cannot allow his king to be cutoff on the h file when the White rook checks on the g file.

Aug-04-17  Howard: Mednis also analyzed this endgame in a 1979 issue of CL&R.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC