chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Henry Baudet vs H Thomas
Niederrheinischer Schachverband-NSB (1911), Krefeld GER, rd 1, Sep-30
Four Knights Game: Spanish. Symmetrical Variation (C49)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more H Baudet/H Thomas game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have photographs. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-26-14  Karpova: This game was played on board 3 of the 3rd Netherlands versus Lower Rhine Region match in Krefeld. Black's name is given as <H. Thomas>.

Annotations by W Therkatz from the 'Krefelder Zeitung' of October 21, 1911 (condensed):

6.d3 <For the exchange variation see Nimzowitsch vs Leonhardt, 1911>.

7.Bg5 <White preserved the advantage of the first move. This move is currently believed to be the strongest attacking continuation, just like in main variation of the French and the QGD.>

7...Bxc3 <Played by Pillsbury in the play-off against Tarrasch at Vienna 1898, is currently questioned. The ♗ can be useful for Black in a later castling attack of the White King's side ♙s (Rochadeangriffe der weißen Königsbauern). The question whether Black can keep up the symmetry with 7...Bg4 is interesting. Black had no success with this in Schlechter vs Leonhardt, 1910. A satisfying is yet not clearly demonstrable, also the answer 7...Ne7, which was so popular in the St.Petersburg tournament appears shaken, see Schlechter vs Duras, 1911>.

8...Bg4 <Better is 8...Bd7 as in Schlechter vs Teichmann, 1910, while the once highly regarded 8...Qe7 was hit by the variation as in Spielmann vs Rubinstein, 1911>.

9...Bd7 <Incorrect would be (after prior different move order) 9...h6? 10.Bxf6 Bxf3 11.Bxd8 Bxd1 12.Bxc7 Bxc2 13.Rfc1 Rac8 14.Bxd6 Rfd8 15.Bxc6 Rxd6 16.Rxc2 Rdxc6 17.Rd1 and wins as in Barasz-Domberger, Hamburger Hauptturnier 1910.> The game is not in the database and there is a typo as 13...Rfc8 and 14...Rfd8 are given, so it's not clear if it was actually 13...Rfc8 14...Rcd8 or 13...Rac8 14...Rfd8.

10.Rb1 <As played by Schlechter. Also possible is 10.Qd2 h6 11.Bxf6 Qxf6 12.Ne1 g5! and so on (Bergmann-Dimer, Hamburg 1911).> Another typo as the line is given as 9.Qd2 h6 10.Bxf6 and so on.

10...Rb8 <? Teichmann ignored the threatening White ♖ move in the Hamburg game (see note to move 8) and tried to speed up his development with ...Qe7, using the Queen's ♖ on the King's file. The text move has the other drawback of taking away a possibly important flight square from the ♘c6.>

12...gxf6 <The ♙ has to retake as 12...Qxf6? 14.d5 winning a piece. If b8 was free, 13...Nb8 could be played.>

14.d5 <!>

14...f5 <Black has no choice as 14...Nd8 15.Bxd7 Qxd7 16.Nf5 Kh7 17.Qh5 is decisive.>

15.dxc6 <? It appears that 15.Qh5! is the fastest way to win as it protects the attacked ♘ and keeps up the threat to win a piece, e. g. 15.Qh5! Nd8 16.Bxd7 Qxd7 17.Nxf5 f6 18.Qg6+ Kh8 19.Qxh6+ Kg8 20.f4 and wins. If Black tries to sacrifice a piece, e. g. 15...fxe4 then 16.Qxh6! is a good answer, e. g. 16...Nd8 17.Bxd7 Qxd7 18.Qg5+ Kh7! 19.Qf6! Rg8! 20.Nf5 Rg6 21.Qh4+ Kg8 22.Ne7+ Kg7 23.Nxg6 fxg6 24.f4! and wins. If Black brings about the ♕ trade 15.Qh5 Qg5 16.Qxg5+ hxg5 then simply 17.Nf3 and wins.>

31.Rb5 <!>

31...Qxd3 <Here Black could try 31...e4 and if 32.Qxe4 Qxe4 33.Nf6+ Kg6 34.Nxe4 Rxc4 followed by Rxc2, but White would answer 32.Qd4. After the ♕ trade, a winning endgame for White follows, which he conducts with masterly precision.>

Source: Pages 65-66 of the February-March 1912 'Wiener Schachzeitung'

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC