chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Robert Smith vs Charles Fisher
Fisher - Smith (1873), Sydney AUS, rd 1, Sep-17
Dutch Defense: Classical Variation (A84)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 11 more R Smith/C Fisher games
sac: 40.Rxg6+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Games that have been used in game collections will have a section at the bottom which shows collections which include it. For more information, see "What are Game Collections?" on our Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-21-14  optimal play: <We have the pleasure of informing our readers that Mr. Smith has accepted Mr. Fisher's challenge to play a short match, to be decided in favour of the winner of the first seven games.

The contest is to be played at Woollahra <a suburb of Sydney>, under the Praxis rules, and with a time limit of seventeen moves per hour.

- Australian Town and Country Journal (Sydney, NSW) issue Saturday 20 September 1873 page 20

The match between Messrs. Fisher and Smith was commenced on the 17th instant <i.e. on the 17th September 1873> at the residence of the latter.

- Australian Town and Country Journal (Sydney, NSW) issue Saturday 27 September 1873 page 21>

3.g3 looks to have been a novelty introduced by Smith in this game.

Following this match the next occasion this was played seems to be Max Weiss vs J N Berger, 1880

3...Bb4+

Alekhine tried this twice against Euwe (games 24 & 26) in their 1935 World Championship Match.

8.d5

<The advance of this Pawn is showy, but altogether unsound> *

<He could also have played P to K 4 with advantage> **

10...c5 or 10...cxd6

<Mr. Fisher selected wisely in not capturing the Q P ; had he done so, White would speedily recover the Pawn and obtain a fine game by playing his Kt to Q 4 and then to Q Kt 5> *

<It is probable that Black overlooked that he could have captured the Q P with impunity> **

Houdini sides with 10...cxd6

15.Qb3+

<This and the following move are badly played, and expose White to attack; he should have castled without delay> *

18...Ng4

<Black has now a fine position> *

20...Qf6

<He should have played P to Q Kt 4> **

Houdini came up with 20...Qc8 as the preferred move.

21...Nec6

<Kt to B 2 would win tho Q P in a few moves> *

23...Nca5 ? 23...b5 wins!

<Here Black misses a chance, P to Q Kt 4 would have made the enemy very uncomfortable> *

<Here again P to Q Kt 4 is the correct move> **

27...Nc5

<We like Kt to Kt 2 better e.g. 27... Kt to Kt 2 ; 28. P to K 4 ; R takes P ; 29. R takes R ; Kt takes R ; 30. R to Q sq ; Kt takes P ; And Black has at least an even game> *

33...Re6 ?

<A miscalculation, giving the aspiring Pawn a free pass.

R to B 3 would have won the P, if, in reply, White checked at K 7, Black could interpose the R> *

36...Kf6 ?

<Here black should have taken the P and then have checked at Q 8> *

39...Nf7 ?

<A fatal error, Black has neglected many opportunities of winning tho Q P, and now it rises in judgment against him> *

Instead 39...Ke7 might have kept Black in the game.

40.Rxg6+ wins!

41.Nxf7 !

<Capitally played> **

Smith scores a first-up win in their race to seven.

*Australian Town and Country Journal (Sydney, NSW) issue Saturday 27 September 1873 page 21

**The Australasian (Melbourne, Vic.) issue Saturday 4 October 1873 page 12

Dec-28-14  poorthylacine: A lot of thanks for this record and for the good annotations too, OPTIMAL PLAT!! This not only for this game but for all the match of course!!

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC