chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
William Crane vs Julius Jacobsen
Jacobsen - Crane Australian Championship (1897), Sydney AUS, rd 9, Dec-06
Queen's Gambit Declined: Harrwitz Attack (D35)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 13 more W Crane/J Jacobsen games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-21-21  optimal play: 21.Rd3? b4!

Better is 21.e5

<<<<THE AUSTRALIAN CHESS CHAMPIONSHIP.>

WON BY J. L. JACOBSEN.>

The ninth and final game was won by Mr. Jacobsen last night, making his score seven games to one and one draw.

In this game Mr. Crane opened with the Q P opening, which his opponent met carefully, and the play proceeded upon modern lines up to about the 20th move.

Mr. Crane then seemed to relax and Mr. Jacobsen obtained an attack which gradually grew in strength, Mr. Crane resigning the game and the match upon his 36th move.

Thus ended a match of which not the least pleasing feature was the thorough good feeling which existed between the contestants and all concerned throughout.

The critics are much divided in opinion as to the cause of such a one-sided result between two players who had hitherto proved so evenly matched.

Some hold that Mr. Crane's play was below his usual form; others consider that Mr. Jacobsen played with greater ability than formerly.

However this may be, an interesting match has been fought and won, and when the games come to be exhaustively analysed the play will probably compare favorably, at any rate for lively situations, with that of previous similar contests.

Mr. Crane, "the hero of a hundred fights," who has done yeoman's service in the cause of chess, will now retire from such arduous contests, and surely no one is more entitled to an honorable rest.

On the other hand, the new champion, Mr. Jacobsen, only played the match to assert his position as an Australian chess authority, and has neither time, inclination, nor sufficiently robust health to defend the title.

He will also retire shortly from protracted matches, but Mr. W. H. Jonas, having so often and earnestly expressed his wish to play for the championship of Australasia, Mr. Jacobsen has decided to play this one match before retiring.

Mr. Jonas last night again formally challenged Mr. Jacobsen, and deposited a portion of the stakes.

Mr. Jacobsen, by the terms of the championship, is entitled to six months' grace, but he is willing to concede a portion of that time, and the match will probably take place early in April.>

Daily Telegraph (Sydney, NSW), Tuesday 7 December 1897, page 6>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC